Open Access

Additional sex combs interacts with enhancer of zeste and trithorax and modulates levels of trimethylation on histone H3K4 and H3K27 during transcription of hsp70

Epigenetics & Chromatin201710:43

Received: 26 April 2017

Accepted: 13 September 2017

Published: 19 September 2017



Maintenance of cell fate determination requires the Polycomb group for repression; the trithorax group for gene activation; and the enhancer of trithorax and Polycomb (ETP) group for both repression and activation. Additional sex combs (Asx) is a genetically identified ETP for the Hox loci, but the molecular basis of its dual function is unclear.


We show that in vitro, Asx binds directly to the SET domains of the histone methyltransferases (HMT) enhancer of zeste [E(z)] (H3K27me3) and Trx (H3K4me3) through a bipartite interaction site separated by 846 amino acid residues. In Drosophila S2 cell nuclei, Asx interacts with E(z) and Trx in vivo. Drosophila Asx is required for repression of heat-shock gene hsp70 and is recruited downstream of the hsp70 promoter. Changes in the levels of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 downstream of the hsp70 promoter in Asx mutants relative to wild type show that Asx regulates H3K4 and H3K27 trimethylation.


We propose that during transcription Asx modulates the ratio of H3K4me3 to H3K27me3 by selectively recruiting the antagonistic HMTs, E(z) and Trx or other nucleosome-modifying enzymes to hsp70.


Additional sex combs SET domain Trithorax Enhancer of zeste hsp70 transcriptional elongation Histone trimethylation


Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins maintain gene repression and activation, respectively, during metazoan development [13]. In Drosophila melanogaster, Asx was originally identified as a PcG mutant because of prominent posterior transformations caused by derepression of Hox genes [46]. Subsequently, it was observed that embryos mutant for Asx exhibit both anterior and posterior transformations, because Hox genes are improperly activated and derepressed, respectively [68]. Consistent with this model, Asx mutants enhance the homeotic transformation of trxG [8] and PcG [9, 10] mutations. Genes with these characteristics have been termed enhancers of trithorax and Polycomb (ETP) [11, 12]. Genetic analysis suggests that Asx is required for both trxG and PcG function.

Various enzymatic activities are associated with trxG and PcG proteins, including trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) and H3K27 [13, 14]. Thus, one model to explain the ETP function of Asx is that it interacts directly with E(z) and Trx to regulate H3K4 and H3K27 methylation. An alternative model is that Asx affects trimethylation of H3K4 and H3K27 indirectly by regulating histone demethylases or acetyltransferases. In either model, Asx should be required to regulate levels of H3K4 and H3K27 methylation in vivo. To our knowledge, neither of these models has been tested on Asx or its mammalian homologs, perhaps because of difficulty of identifying a single locus at which both PcG and trxG proteins act at the same time in the same cell.

The hsp70 gene is well characterized. Before heat-shock induction, the hsp70 promoter region is maintained in a nucleosome-free conformation by the GAGA factor [15], with a paused Pol II located approximately 25 nucleotides downstream of the transcription starting site [16, 17]. The paused Pol II is phosphorylated at serine 5 (Ser-5) but not Ser-2 of the C-terminal domain (CTD) [18], showing that transcriptional elongation has not begun. In Drosophila, these events occur 2–4 h after egg deposition. Heat stress leads to recruitment of heat-shock factor (HSF) [19], positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb), mediator and various elongation factors including Spt5, Spt6 and facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) complex that contains Spt16 for synthesis of full-length transcripts [2022]. P-TEFb contains Cdk9 that is required for Pol II CTD Ser-2 phosphorylation and transcription elongation [18].

Any temporal analysis of the heat-shock response in Drosophila later in development than the first 4 h of embryogenesis will have three phases: (1) an early phase corresponding to the switch from a promoter-paused state to elongation; (2) an intermediate phase that combines transcriptional initiation, promoter clearance and elongation; and (3) a phase in which transcription of heat-shock genes is terminated. Recruitment of the trithorax (Trx) protein complex, TAC1, is required to maintain high levels of transcriptional elongation and of H3K4 trimethylation at the hsp70 promoter region [23]. The PcG gene pleiohomeotic (pho) is required to repress hsp70 transcription after heat shock during termination phase [24]. Maternal deposition of Asx mRNA or Asx protein prevents analysis of transcriptional initiation or promoter clearance at hsp70 in Asx mutants in early embryos (first 4 h of embryogenesis). In later embryos, when initiation, clearance and elongation are occurring simultaneously, it is difficult to distinguish these phases of transcription in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments.

Here, we show that Asx interacts directly in vitro and associates in vivo with E(z) and Trx, suggesting a recruitment mechanism for modulation of trimethylation of H3K4 and H3K27 at hsp70. We also show that hsp70 is an excellent target to investigate the molecular basis of Asx function as an ETP after 10 min of heat-shock induction. We show that at the hsp70 locus, Asx represses hsp70 transcription because Asx mutants induce induction of the heat-shock response, but unlike the PcG gene pho, it is not required in the termination phase. Asx is recruited downstream of the promoter following heat stress induction, but during the first 10 min of heat-shock induction, Asx repression of hsp70 is independent of changes in levels of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3. Subsequently, Asx modulates levels of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, notably at transition from elongation to termination during the heat-shock cycle. This, however, does not exclude the modulation of trimethylation by recruitment of other histone methyltransferases.


Fly culture, transgenic lines, embryo imaging and cell culture

Flies were maintained at 22 °C on standard cornmeal-sucrose medium containing Tegosept as a mold inhibitor. The Asx 3 allele was maintained over a CyO twist-GAL4, UAS-eGFP balancer chromosome. The Asx 3 mutant is a null mutation with 1.3-kb deletion in the middle of coding region that produces a truncated protein product of approximately 800 N-terminal amino acids [4, 25] (Hodgson, unpublished).


The following antibodies were employed: sheep polyclonal anti-Asx (aa 75–95) IgG [25]; rabbit polyclonal anti-trimethyl histone H3K4 antibody (Active Motif, Cat.# 39159; 1:1000 dilution); rabbit polyclonal anti-trimethyl histone H3K27 (Millipore, Cat.# 07-449; 1:100 dilution); rabbit polyclonal IgG antibody (Abcam, Cat.# ab27478; 1:200 dilution) used as a negative control; rabbit polyclonal anti-E(z) (Santa Cruz, Cat.# sc-98265); rat polyclonal anti-Trx antisera and purified rabbit anti-Trx IgG (Mazo Lab). Rabbit anti-Asx antibody was raised against Drosophila Asx (aa 200–356) (Additional file 1: Text S1). The specificity of rabbit anti-Asx antibody was tested (Additional file 2: Fig. S1).

Construction of Asx full length and deletion mutants for cell-free expression

The DNA fragment corresponding to the full-length Asx (1669 amino acid residues) was subcloned from pBS(KS+)–Asx(1–1669) as an NdeI–KpnI fragment into the NdeI–SmaI sites of the vector pTβSTOP (kindly provided by Robert Tjian) downstream of the T7 promoter and β globin leader sequence to generate pTβSTOP-A(1–1669). An Asx COOH terminal deletion mutant A(1–1200) was generated by replacing the wild-type 1.59-kb SpHI–KpnI sequence in pBS(KS+)–Asx with a 0.495-kb PCR fragment produced using the following primer pairs: forward: 5′-ccggattccttgg GCA AGA CAT TAC CAG TGG CT-3′ and reverse: 5′-ccggagtggtacc TCA CAT ATT ACT GTT GTG-3′. The pBS(KS+)–Asx(1–1200) was subsequently digested with KpnI, end-repaired with T4 DNA polymerase and digested with NdeI. The truncated 3.6-kb Asx fragment was subcloned into the NdeI–SmaI site of pTβSTOP to generate pTβSTOP-A(1–1200). Four additional COOH terminal deletion fragments as well as four NH2 terminal deletion fragments of Asx were amplified from the pTβSTOP-A(1–1669) by PCR (Additional file 3: Table S1), subcloned into the NdeI–SmaI/EcoRV site of pTβSTOP and transformed into DH5α cells (Thermo Fisher). All plasmid constructs were expressed in the TNT-coupled T7 transcription/translation system (Promega) using rabbit reticulocyte lysate (IVT–RRL) for GST pull-down assays.

Construction of GST fusions of AsxETSI-2 and the SET domains of E(z) and Trx

The SET domain of E(z) (aa residues 626–740) was amplified by PCR using the primer pair shown in Additional file 3: Table S1 and subcloned into the EcoRI–XhoI sites of pGEX-6P1 to generate pGEX-6P1-E(z)SET. The SET domain of Trx (aa 3608-3759) (kindly provided by Michael Kyba) was subcloned into the EcoRI–XhoI sites of pGEX-6P1 to generate pGEX-6P1-TrxSET. The E(z)/Trx SET domain interaction site 2 of Asx (AsxETSI-2), residues 1200–150 l, was amplified using primer pair in Additional file 3: Table S1 and subcloned into the EcoRI–XhoI sites of pGEX-6P-1 to generate pGEX-6P1-AsxETSI-2. The three GST fusion constructs were each transformed into the E. coli Rosetta 2(DE3) strain (Novagen) for expression.

Expression and purification of GST-TrxSET and GST-AsxETSI-2 fusion proteins

Overnight cultures of 10 ml of cells transformed with either pGEX-6P-1, pGEX-6P1-TrxSET or pGEX-6P1-AsxETSI-2 were diluted into 240 ml Luria–Bertani (LB)/100 μg ml−1 Amp media and induced at an A600 of 0.8 units with 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thio-galactoside (IPTG)/100 μM ZnSO4 for 14 h at 23 °C. The cells were centrifuged, washed with PBS, lysed in 20 ml buffer TEEZMG—0.5 M KCl, pH 7.9, supplemented with protease inhibitors and treated with 4 mg/ml lysozyme (Sigma) for 30 min at 4 °C. Each lysate was sonicated, diluted twofold with buffer TEEZMG—0.5 M KCl/protease inhibitors and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. Extracts of GST, GST-TrxSET or GST-AsxETSI-2 were recovered in the supernatant as soluble fractions named S1.

Twenty ml of each S1 fraction was rotated with 0.5 ml of GSH-agarose pre-equilibrated with buffer TEMZG—0.3 M KCl, pH 7.9, for 3 h at 4 °C. The protein-bound resin was washed three times with buffer PBSMG—0.3 M NaCl, pH 7.2, three times with buffer PBSMG—0.8 M NaCl, pH 7.2, three times with buffer TEMZG—0.5 M KCl, pH 7.9, and once with buffer TEMZ—0.1 M KCl, pH 9.0, at 4 °C. Proteins were eluted from a column with 6 ml of buffer Elut-TEMZ—0.1 M KCl, pH 9.0/10 mM reduced glutathione–NaOH and collected in 0.5 ml fractions. Peak fractions were pooled and dialyzed into buffer Dyl-TEEMZG—0.1 M KCl, pH 7.9, for 18 h at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C. Buffers used in these experiments are described in Additional file 4: Text S2.

Expression and purification of GST-E(z)SET fusion protein

A 10-ml overnight culture of pGEX-6P1-E(z)SET was diluted into 240 ml LB/100 μg/ml Amp media and induced at an A600 of 0.8 units with 1 mM IPTG/100 μM ZnSO4 for 3 h at 23 °C. The cells were washed in PBS, lysed in 20 ml buffer TEEZG—0.5 M KCl, pH 7.9, supplemented with protease inhibitors and treated with 4 mg/ml lysozyme (Sigma) for 30 min at 4 °C. The lysate was sonicated, diluted twofold with buffer TEEZG—0.5 M KCl, pH 7.9/protease inhibitors and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C.

The pellet was resuspended in 15 ml buffer TZS—0.3 M NaCl, pH 7.9 using a Dounce homogenizer and mixed on a nutator for 2 h at 4 °C to solubilize GST-E(z)SET. The homogenate was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant (PI-Ext) was diluted fivefold with buffer TZD—0.3 M NaCl, pH 7.9, to reduce the sarkosyl concentration to 2% in the presence of Triton X-100 and CHAPS [26]. Fifty ml of diluted P1-Ext was mixed with 0.5 ml of GSH-agarose and pre-equilibrated with buffer TZXSC—0.3 M NaCl, pH 7.9, for 3 h at 4 °C on a rotator. The protein-bound resin was washed three times with buffer TZGXSC—0.3 M KCl, pH 7.9, three times with buffer TZGXSC—0.6 M KCl, pH 7.9, and two times with buffer TZXSGC—0.1 M NaCl, pH 9.0, at 4 °C. Proteins were eluted from a column with 6 ml of buffer Elut-TZGXSC—0.1 M NaCl, pH 9.0/10 mM reduced glutathione–NaOH, pH 9.0, and collected in 0.5 ml fractions. Peak fractions were pooled and dialyzed into 1 l buffer Dyl-TZXS—0.1 M NaCl/15% glycerol for 18 h at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C.

GST pull-down assay of 35S-Asx interaction with SET domains of Trx and E(z)

For each reaction, 60 μl of packed GSH-agarose equilibrated with immobilization buffer IM-A pH 7.9 was resuspended in 400 μl buffer IM-A and mixed with 6 μg of purified GST for 120 min at 4 °C on a nutator. The resin was pelleted at 6000 rpm for 2 min, washed two times and resuspended with 300 μl buffer IM-A on ice. For each fragment tested, the immobilized GST (GST-agarose) was split into a 250-μl aliquot to pre-clear the Asx in vitro translation mixture and a 50-μl aliquot for a control GST pull-down assay (30).

Asx protein fragments were produced by in vitro translation in rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL; Promega). Briefly, 1 μg supercoiled pTβSTOP plasmids containing Asx DNA fragments 1.8 kb to 5 kb long (Additional file 3: Table S1) were denatured at 80 °C, chilled on ice, expressed and labeled with 35S using the 25-μl reaction TNT T7-coupled transcription/translation rabbit reticulocyte lysate kit (Promega). The lysates were subsequently adjusted to 5 mM Mg acetate and treated with DNase I and RNase A/RNase T1 (Fermentas) for 15 min at 25 °C, and the Roche protease inhibitor cocktail was added. The lysate was pre-cleared by mixing with 100 μl of buffer 2× PDB-P5 and 25 μl of GST-agarose for 30 min at 4 °C. To assay interactions, 65 μl of pre-cleared 35S-Asx-containing lysate was mixed with either immobilized 1 μg GST, GST-E(z)SET or GST-TrxSET for 2 h on a nutator at 4 °C. Lysate-bound agarose beads were washed once with 300 μl buffer 1× PDB-P5, three times with buffer WB—0.6 M NaCl, pH 7.9, and once with buffer WB—0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.9. The protein-bound agarose pellet was mixed with 15 μl 2× SDS sample buffer, resolved by SDS–PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography.

GST pull-down western assays of embryo nuclear extract

Asx fragments indentified as interaction sites for SET domains of either Trx (TSI), E(z) (ESI) or both (ETSI) were subcloned into pGEX-6P-1, expressed and purified from Rosetta 2(DE3) cells as described above for GST-AsxETSI-2. Detailed methods are described in Additional file 5: Text S3.

Co-immunoprecipitation western assays of embryo nuclear extract

For co-immunoprecipitation experiments, 800 micrograms of nuclear extract Bio-Rex 70 fraction was diluted into 300 μl of 1× IP buffer containing 5% polyethylene glycol 10,000 in place of Ficoll and mixed with 1:100 dilution of purified sheep anti-Asx IgG at 4 °C for 3 h [25]. Immune complexes were precipitated with protein G-Sepharose at 25 °C for 15 min and washed six times with buffer TELG containing 0.22 and 0.26 M KCl and two times with buffer TELG containing 0.05 M KCl. The samples were subsequently resolved on SDS–polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes for western analysis as described above. Blots were probed with 1:3000 dilution of purified rabbit anti-Trx IgG or 1:200 dilution of rabbit anti-E(z) IgG (Santa Cruz Biotech, cat# sc-98265).

Demonstrating protein–protein interaction in situ by PLA

Drosophila S2 cells were cultured at room temperature in chamber slides, heat shocked at 37 °C for 15 min and allowed to recover 60 or 180 min at room temperature. Cells were fixed with 2% formaldehyde in culture medium for 20 min, washed with PBS, blocked and incubated overnight at 4 °C with either sheep anti-Asx and rat anti-Trx or sheep anti-Asx and rabbit anti-E(z). Proximity ligation assays (PLAs) were performed as described [27, 28] with several modifications. Secondary antibodies (Jackson Immuno Research) were conjugated to 5′-amino-modified MTPX oligonucleotides in Additional file 6: Table S2 using the Thunder-Link oligo conjugation systems (Innova Biosciences 420-0300) and stored at 4 °C. Circularization PLA 5′-phosphorylated oligonucleotides as well as detector PLA oligonucleotides were synthesized (Additional file 6: Table S2). For each reaction, 40 μl secondary antibodies with conjugated oligonucleotides were incubated on a shaker for 1 h in a humidity chamber at 37 °C. Three circularization PLA oligos were annealed to two corresponding PLA probes (Additional file 6: Table S2) and ligated with T4 DNA ligase (Thermo) for 30 min at 37 °C. A closed circle forms if proteins are in close proximity [29]. Rolling-circle amplification by phi28 polymerase (Thermo) was carried out in the presence of fluorescent-labeled detector oligonucleotides (Additional file 6: Table S2) for 100 min in the dark at 37 °C.

Immunostaining of salivary gland polytene chromosomes

Preparation and immunostaining of chromosomes have been described [23]. For immunostaining, sheep anti-Asx IgG and FITC- or Texas-Red-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch, PA) were used at dilutions of 1:100 [25]. Images of labeled chromosomes were acquired with a Zeiss microscope equipped with a digital camera, and processed using Adobe Photoshop.

Embryo collection

Flies were acclimated to the laying chamber for 2 days before 10–14-h AEL embryos from about 300 flies were collected at 22 °C on 2% agar (supplemented with 1% sucrose/3.5% ethanol/1.5% apple cider vinegar). Embryos on laying plates were immediately washed onto a nylon sieve to remove excess yeast, dechorionated with 50% bleach and washed twice with 120 mM NaCl; 0.02% Triton X-100, followed by two washes in 1x PBS; 0.05% Triton X-100. Asx 3 homozygous mutant embryos were identified by the absence of GFP expression under a wide-field GFP fluorescence microscope. The wild-type strain Oregon R was used as a control.

Heat-shock induction and recovery in embryos

Wild-type or homozygous Asx 3 mutant embryos were collected in 200 μl of 1× PBT into plastic microcentrifuge tubes that were incubated in a 37 °C water bath for 5, 10 or 15 min. To study recovery, embryos heat shocked for 15 min were transferred onto a small piece of moist filter paper placed in a moist chamber and incubated for up to 180 min at room temperature, and transferred into a new tube with 200 μl of 1× PBT for further analysis.

Determining hsp70 mRNA level in embryos

RNA preparation and first-strand cDNA synthesis were done as previously described [30]. A dilution series of Drosophila genomic DNA was used to generate standard curves for hsp70 and Ahcy89E. The relative mRNA levels of genes were measured with comparison to the standard curve. All quantitative PCRs (qPCRs) were performed on the Step-One Plus Real-Time PCR system (ABI). The hsp70 expression level in different samples was normalized to the expression of Ahcy89E, whose expression does not change during heat shock.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)

ChIP was carried out essentially as described [31] except as follows. Exactly 200 embryos (in 200 μl buffer) were sonicated for five pulses of 10 s at 30% power at room temperature with an ultrasonic processor (CPX 130 PB, Cole Parmer), followed by 50 s on ice to yield 500-bp fragments. Samples were mixed with 200 μl of 6 M urea and incubated for 10 min on ice, and insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was divided into 4 × 100 μl aliquots, and ChIP experiments were performed with H3K4, H3K27 and IgG antibodies. After the final washing step, 100 μl of 10% Chelex 100 resin (BioRad) was added to protein G beads with vortexing, and samples were incubated at 95 °C for 10 min. Samples were deproteinized with proteinase K (Sigma) at 55 °C, incubated for a further 10 min at 95 °C and centrifuged to recover the beads [32]. Approximately 3% of the immunoprecipitated material was assayed by qPCR using primers specific to sequences at the hsp70 promoter downstream, bxd PRE and Ubx promoter (Additional file 7: Text S4).


Asx contains a bipartite site for interaction with SET domains of both E(z) and Trx

Genetic analysis suggests that Asx is required for both trxG and PcG function. However, no genetic experiment can show that Asx has a direct effect on the histone methyltransferases (HMT) responsible for trimethylation of H3K4 and H3K27. Therefore, we looked for evidence of direct association of Asx with Trx, a key HMT for H3K4, and E(z), the HMT for H3K27. Alignment of the protein sequences of Trx and E(z) revealed a SET domain catalytic site [33] with a 35% amino acid identity between both proteins (Fig. 1a). To determine whether association between Asx and both HMTs can occur through the SET domains of Trx and E(z), we developed a GST pull-down autoradiography (GST pull-down) assay [34]. The SET domains of Trx and E(z) were fused to GST, expressed in E. coli Rosetta 2 (DE3) cells, purified by GSH-agarose affinity chromatography and immobilized on GSH-agarose (Fig. 1b). A preparation of 35S-Met-labeled Asx produced using coupled in vitro transcription/translation in rabbit reticulocyte lysate (IVT–RRL) (Promega) was mixed with immobilized GST-TrxSET, GST-E(z)SET and GST in control experiments. Full-length 35S-Asx interacted specifically with both GST-E(z)SET and GST-TrxSET (Fig. 1c) and exhibited a difference in the salt sensitivity of association with GST-TrxSET relative to GST-E(z). Higher salt concentrations increased the association of Asx with GST-E(z)SET but decreased the association with GST-TrxSET, which may reflect ionic or hydrophobic effects on interaction [35].
Fig. 1

Full-length Asx interacts directly with SET domains of trxG activator, Trx and PcG repressor, E(z) in a GST pull-down assay. a Clustal Omega sequence alignment of SET domains of Drosophila Trx and E(z), showing 35% sequence identity. b SDS–PAGE (13%) analysis of affinity purified E. coli-expressed GST fusions of SET domains of E(z) and Trx. c GST pull-down analysis of 35S-methionine-labeled rabbit reticulocyte lysate-in vitro translated (RRL-IVT) Asx with GST fusions of SET domains of E(z) and Trx. The stringency of the NaCl washes indicates stronger interaction between Asx and GST-E(z)SET than GST-TrxSET. Proteins were analyzed on 13% SDS–polyacrylamide reducing gels. ()* Estimated fold binding of Asx with GST fusions relative to GST (determined by densitometry) is shown beneath each lane

To determine the strength of association of Asx with E(z) or Trx in nuclear extracts, given that in vitro, the Asx-Trx(SET) interaction is about 5× weaker than the Asx-E(z)(SET) interaction, the Bio-Rex 70 fractions were further analyzed by anti-Asx co-immunoprecipitation coupled with α-Trx or α-E(z) western blotting (Fig. 2). E(z) and Trx were resolved into two distinct salt fractions of 0.1 and 0.85 M, respectively, by Bio-Rex 70 (Fig. 2b). Asx was co-eluted with Trx in the BR70-0.85 fraction and weakly co-immunoprecipitated at 0.26 M NaCl (Fig. 2c). By contrast, there was no detectable co-elution nor co-immunoprecipitation of Asx with E(z) in either the BR70-0.1 or BR70-0.85 fractions (Fig. 2d, e). This suggests that in nuclear extracts, the interaction between Asx and E(z) is weakly ionic or transient, which may be readily disrupted on the Bio-Rex 70 resin by a salt gradient. Alternatively, the amount of Asx in association with E(z) is below the limits of detection of immunoprecipitation. A third untested explanation is that interactions between Asx and Trx complexes are more stable than interactions of the individual proteins, and vice versa for Asx and E(z).
Fig. 2

Asx co-fractionates and co-immunoprecipitates with Trx in embryo nuclear extracts. a Schematic of Bio-Rex-70 fractionation of embryo nuclear extracts and coupled co-immunoprecipitation–western blot analysis. b Western blot analysis of Bio-Rex 70 fractions with anti-Asx (upper panel), anti-Trx (middle panel) and anti-E(z) (lower panel). c Coupled anti-Asx immunoprecipitation and anti-Trx western blot analysis of the BR70-0.85 fraction, showing Asx association with Trx. d Coupled anti-Asx immunoprecipitation and anti-E(z) western blot analysis of the BR70-0.1 fraction, showing lack of Asx association with E(z) in the enriched E(z) fraction. e Coupled anti-Asx immunoprecipitation and anti-E(z) western blot analysis of the BR70-0.85 fraction, showing lack of Asx association with E(z) in the enriched Trx fraction

The interaction sites of GST-E(z)SET and GST-TrxSET on full-length Asx were mapped by determining the association of 35S-Asx COOH terminal or NH2 terminal deletion fragments (Fig. 3a) with GST-E(z)SET and GST-TrxSET using the GST pull-down assay (Figs. 3b, 4). Two interaction sites were identified on Asx for both GST-E(z)SET and GST-TrxSET (Fig. 3b): (1) at NH2 terminal residues 1–354 termed E(z)/Trx SET domain interaction site 1 (AsxETSI-1) and (2) at COOH terminal residues 1200–1501 termed (AsxETSI-2) (Fig. 4). In addition, a weak but specific COOH interaction site at terminal residues 1501–1669 was mapped for Trx (Fig. 3b), termed Trx SET domain interaction site (AsxTSI) (Fig. 4). These results suggest that Asx contains a bipartite E(z)/Trx SET domain interaction (ETSI-1 and ETSI-2) site that has low sequence identity (14.97%) and is separated by 846 amino acids (Additional file 8: Fig. S2). It is interesting that the Asx NH2 terminal residues 1–1200 which contain ETSI-1 did not show any significant binding with GST-E(z)SET and GST-TrxSET. In together with other pull-down results, it is possible that the Asx 610–1200 fragment which contains HR2–HR6 domain plays a negative role on ETSI-1 and GST-E(z)SET/GST-TrxSET interaction.
Fig. 3

Asx contains two shared interaction sites for GST-TrxSET and GST-E(z)SET. a SDS–PAGE analysis of expression of 35S-labeled RRL-IVT deletion fragments of Asx (3% of the input for GST pull-down assay in Fig. 2b) and exposed for an hour at −70 °C (lanes 1–9). b Identification of two shared interaction sites for GST-E(z)SET and GST-TrxSET (1–354 and 1200–1500) and one unique, weak site for GST-TrxSET (1501–1669) on Asx. GST pull-down analysis of the Asx fragments in A) with GST-E(z)SET (lane 3) and GST-TrxSET (lane 4) compared to GST controls (lane 1). ()* Estimated fold binding of Asx with GST fusions relative to GST (determined by densitometry) is shown beneath each lane. Unbound fragments, as shown for A(1–1200), are listed in Fig. 3b

Fig. 4

Map of Asx summarizing interaction sites of E(z) and Trx SET domains indentified using a GST pull-down assay. a Linear map of Asx showing a bipartite recognition site for both E(z)SET and TrxSET domains. The NH2 terminal recognition site (residues 1–354) termed E(z)-Trx SET domain interaction site 1 (ETSI-1) and the COOH terminal site (residues 1200–1501) termed ETSI-2 are marked above in blue. The single weak recognition site for TrxSET domain (residues 1501–1669), termed TSI, is marked in orange. The ETSI-1 site overlaps both the conserved AsxH domain (residues 200–354) and the Calypso binding site (marked below in green). b Summary of the GST pull-down analysis of the interaction between 35S-labeled Asx deletion fragments with GST fusion proteins of E(z) SET domain or Trx SET domain after a 0.6 M NaCl wash. Non-binding Asx fragments A(1–1200), A(1–200), A(200–354) and A(1381–1501) are indicated by (−). Scouring of the interactions of the Asx deletion fragments with GST-E(z) SET or GST-Trx SET is based on the densitometry of band intensity relative to GST [(++; > tenfold),; +; (twofold–tenfold)]

Alignment of the amino acid sequences of Asx 3 mutants and wild type [25] indicated a deletion of the COOH terminal ETSI-2 and TSI in Asx 3 mutants (Fig. 5a). To test for interaction between E(z) and AsxETSI-2, we developed a GST pull-down western assay using purified GST-ETSI-2 (Fig. 5b) and chromatography fractionated embryo nuclear extracts as a source of E(z) (Fig. 5c). Similar experiments were not performed with AsxETSI-1 because of the instability of purified GST-ETSI-1. The E(z)-enriched BR70-0.1 M chromatography fraction (Fig. 5c) was mixed with immobilized GST-ETSI-2 and resolved by SDS–PAGE coupled with western blotting using anti-E(z) antibody. Two bands were specifically detected on the blot corresponding to E(z) and a breakdown fragment (Fig. 5d) consistent with the interaction of GST-E(z) with AsxETSI-2. It is possible that E(z) was fragmented due to the sub-optimized pull-down condition. These results indicate that Asx ETSI-2 (which is deleted in Asx 3 ) can associate with E(z) in vivo.
Fig. 5

GST-fused AsxETSI-2 interacts with E(z) in embryo nuclear extracts. a Alignment of the amino acid sequence of wt and Asx3 mutant indicates deletion of ETSI-2 and TSI sites in the COOH terminal region, which may disturb the levels of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3. b SDS–PAGE (13%) analysis of purification of E. coli-expressed GST fusions of ETSI-2 domains. c The interaction of ETSI-2 with endogenous E(z) was assayed using extracts prepared from 6- to 18-h-old embryo nuclei. Fractionation of extracts on a Bio-Rex70 column by a step gradient from 0.1 to 0.85 M NaCl elutes E(z) at 0.1 M NaCl fraction as opposed to Trx which elutes at 0.85 M NaCl. d GST-fused ETSI-2 was mixed with the 0.1 M NaCl-containing E(z) fraction in a pull-down assay, using GST as a negative control. The pull-down products were analyzed by 7.5% SDS–PAGE and probed by anti-E(z) antibody in a western blot assay. Lanes (1) pre-marked molecular weight markers (BioRad); (2) 10% input of the pull-down fraction; (3) GST/BR70-0.1 fraction pull down; (4) GST-ETSI-2/BR70-0.1 fraction pull down. The lower band in lane 4 is likely a breakdown product of E(z)

Asx associates with E(z) and Trx after induction and recovery from heat shock in vivo

To further investigate whether Asx weakly or transiently associates with Trx and E(z) in vivo, we performed proximity ligation assay (PLA) in situ following heat shock on Drosophila S2 cells. This assay allows very sensitive (compared to immunoprecipitation) detection of protein–protein interactions either in solution or in situ at single-cell resolution [36]. Association between Asx with Trx was only observed after heat-shock induction, and the level of association becomes significant after 60–180 min of recovery period (Fig. 6a). The association between Asx with E(z) was observed before and after heat-shock induction (Fig. 6b). These results suggest Asx associates with E(z) and Trx in vivo during heat-shock recovery. Taken together, these three protein assays indicate that Asx associates both in vitro and in vivo with E(z) and Trx.
Fig. 6

Asx interacts with E(z) and Trx in Drosophila S2 cells in vivo. a Proximity ligation assay (PLA) between Asx and Trx with Drosophila S2 cells before and after heat-shock induction. Nuclei were labeled with DAPI in blue and PLA signals in green for Asx-Trx and in red for Asx-E(z). b PLA between Asx and E(z) with S2 cells before and after heat-shock induction. c, d Schematic diagram of PLA reaction. Oligonucleotides and antibodies used in PLA are listed in “Methods” section. A closed circle between connector and splints forms if proteins are in close proximity. Rolling-circle amplification (RCA) was carried out in the presence of fluorescent-labeled oligonucleotides. Signals would be detected only when proteins were in distance between 10 and 80 nm

Asx binds to hsp70 promoter downstream region upon heat-shock induction and is required for hsp70 repression during induction and recovery

The foregoing results suggest a mechanism whereby Asx modulates the ratio of H3K4 and H3K27 trimethylation by associating with the antagonistic HMTs during heat shock and recovery. If so, then mutations in Asx should affect levels of trimethylation at histone H3K4 and H3K27 during transcription. To determine whether Asx was recruited to heat-shock loci on chromatin, polytene chromosomes were prepared from salivary glands subjected to 20 min of heat shock at 37 °C, and stained with antibodies to Asx. These were compared to preparations from glands that were not heat shocked. Asx was recruited to hsp70 region (at 87AC) and other heat-shock loci following 20 min of heat shock (Fig. 7a). In contrast, in control polytene chromosomes that were not heat shocked, Asx was recruited to region 89E (Fig. 7a) which includes Ultrabithorax (Ubx) thus serving as a positive control for the polytene staining [25].
Fig. 7

Asx binds to the hsp70 promoter downstream upon heat-shock induction. a Asx antibody staining of the central part of wild-type 3R polytene chromosomes before and after 20-min heat shock at 37 °C. The major heat-shock loci at 87AC, 93D and 95D are labeled. After 20-min heat shock, Asx is recruited to major heat-shock loci indicated. The bithorax complex located at 89E serves as a control for constitutive binding of Asx. b Chromatin immunoprecipitation with anti-Asx and IgG control antibodies from wild-type embryos during heat-shock induction at 37 °C and recovery. The DNA from ChIP samples at hsp70 promoter downstream region was analyzed by qPCR and is shown along the y-axis, and times of heat shock or recovery are shown in the x-axis. Duration of heat shock/recovery is denoted as 15/30, 15/60, 15/90, 15/120 and 15/180 min. The signals are represented as mean ± SEM with N = 3. c Primer map showing the location of primers 218- and 392-bp downstream of hsp70 transcription start site used in ChIP experiments

Pol II recruitment and initiation of hsp70 transcription to generate the paused hsp70 promoter occur early in embryogenesis (2–4 h after egg deposition) when maternally deposited Asx protein or Asx mRNA is still present. To allow enough time for maternal levels of Asx mRNA or protein to drop, and thus allow us to detect the embryonic effect of Asx mutations, heat shock was induced in 14–16-h embryos. Using this protocol, we are unable to assay the role of Asx in establishment of transcriptional initiation and promoter clearance of hsp70 in early embryos. Our studies in later embryos do not attempt to distinguish the role of Asx in elongation between roles at the promoter in re-initiation and promoter clearance, although we biased the results toward elongation by selection of a primer downstream of the promoter (+218 to +392 bp) previously identified as a site of recruitment for Trx upon heat shock [23] for the ChIP experiments below.

The hsp70 gene is induced in all cells of the embryo in response to thermal stress, allowing us to use whole embryos for this study [37]. To determine whether Asx binds downstream of the hsp70 promoter downstream region, we performed ChIP and quantitative PCR (qPCR) using the anti-Asx antibody (Fig. 7b, c). In control embryos that were not subject to thermal stress (0 min of heat shock), Asx did not significantly bind at the hsp70 promoter downstream region. After 15 min of heat shock, the level of Asx binding was threefold higher than with no heat shock. At 30-min recovery after 15-min heat shock, Asx binding to the hsp70 gene increased sevenfold relative to no heat shock. The level of Asx binding at hsp70 gradually decreased from 60-min recovery to 180-min recovery (Fig. 7b). As a positive control for Asx binding in our assay conditions, we tested Asx binding to selected regions within Ubx promoter and bithoraxoid (bxd) Polycomb response element (PRE) in Drosophila embryos with the our Asx antibody in our ChIP assay [10]. The results were consistent with previous observations that Asx binds chromatin at these locations without heat-shock induction (Additional file 9: Fig. S3). These results confirm that the hsp70 locus is a direct binding target of Asx upon heat shock, with peak binding occurring between 15-min induction/30-min recovery and 15-min induction/120-min recovery.

To investigate the effect of Asx on transcription during induction and recovery from heat shock, we compared the steady-state hsp70 mRNA levels during heat shock and recovery of homozygous Asx 3 null mutants to wild-type (Oregon R) embryos (see “Methods” section). The mRNA level difference between the homozygous Asx 3 mutant and wild type was at least twofold during heat-shock induction and recovery, and at 90-min recovery, the difference reached a maximum level at 2.7-fold (Fig. 8a). The steady-state Ahcy89E mRNA levels during heat shock and recovery were stable and the mRNA level was comparable between Asx 3 mutant and wild-type embryos, indicating that Ahcy89E is suitable for normalizing the hsp70 mRNA levels (Fig. 8b). Together, these data show that Asx represses the hsp70 locus during heat-shock induction and recovery. After 180-min recovery, the hsp70 mRNA level in both wild type and homozygous Asx 3 mutant decreased to the level before heat-shock induction, showing that Asx is not required for terminating transcription after heat-shock induction. In addition, peak transcription observed between 15-min induction/30-min recovery and 15-min induction/90-min recovery correlates with Asx binding within this period (Figs. 7b, 8a).
Fig. 8

Asx is required for hsp70 repression during heat-shock induction and recovery. a The relative mRNA levels in wild-type and Asx 3 homozygous null mutant embryos were measured by RT-qPCR. Asx null mutations are embryonic lethal at a late embryonic stage [4], so homozygous 12–15-h Asx 3 mutants were collected using absence of expression of the GFP-marked balancer chromosome as a criterion. The duration of heat shock/recovery is as described in Fig. 7. The x-axis shows the heat-shock induction times at 37 °C and heat-shock recovery times after 15 min of 37 °C heat-shock induction. The y-axis indicates the hsp70 mRNA level normalized to the control gene Ahcy89E mRNA level. The signals are represented as mean ± SEM with N = 3. b The relative mRNA levels of the control gene Ahcy98E are compared between Asx 3 mutant and wild-type embryos throughout the heat-shock induction and recovery. The x-axis shows the heat-shock induction times at 37 °C, and heat-shock recovery times after 15 min of 37 °C heat-shock induction. The y-axis shows the relative mRNA level of the control gene Ahcy89E mRNA, as mean ± SEM with N = 3

Asx transiently reduces H3K4 trimethylation at hsp70 during heat-shock induction

Asx represses hsp70 during heat shock, so in Asx 3 mutant embryos, we expected to observe increased levels of H3K4me3 downstream of the hsp70 promoter after heat shock compared to wild type. As shown in Fig. 9a, in ChIP-qPCR experiments, the level of H3K4 trimethylation in wild type and Asx 3 mutant did not differ in the first 10 min of heat-shock induction. However, at 15-min induction and 15-min/30-min recovery (Fig. 9a), the level of H3K4 trimethylation in Asx 3 mutants was 1.8-fold higher than in wild-type (significant at P < 0.05), suggesting that in wild-type embryos, Asx reduces the level of histone H3K4me3 at these time points. Interestingly, in the later recovery phase, Asx 3 mutants showed less H3K4me3 than wild-type embryos after 120 min of recovery from 15-min heat-shock induction (significant at P < 0.05), consistent with the rapid drop of hsp70 mRNA level during 120-min recovery after heat-shock induction. At this time, Asx could transiently modulate the rate of transcription by governing the rate of transcript decay. We suggest that Asx directly or indirectly regulates H3K4me3 to an appropriate level during heat shock and recovery.

Asx regulates the ratio of histone H3K4 to H3K27 trimethylation at hsp70 during heat-shock induction and recovery

If Asx represses hsp70 by acting as a PcG protein, then we expect to observe reduced H3K27me3 levels in Asx 3 mutants compared to wild type during heat-shock induction and recovery. We performed ChIP-qPCR experiments with anti-H3K27me3 antibody on wild-type and Asx 3 mutant embryos during heat shock and recovery. The level of H3K27me3 in wild type and Asx 3 mutant did not differ markedly at 10 min of heat-shock induction. At subsequent time points from 15-min heat-shock induction to 120-min recovery after heat shock except the 30-min recovery, the level of H3K27me3 in Asx 3 mutants was 1.5-fold lower than in wild type (Fig. 9b).

Thus, the data in Fig. 9a, b show that mutation of Asx alters the levels of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 in the expected way at one target gene during the same regulatory event. Interestingly, the significant increase in the ratio of H3K4me3/H3K27me3 from 15-min induction to 15-min induction/30-min recovery from heat shock in Asx 3 compared to wild type (Fig. 9c) occurs close to the peak of transcription (Fig. 8a) that coincides with the transition from promoter clearance to elongation. As positive and negative controls for the levels of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 in our assay conditions, we compared the highest and lowest levels of recovery of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 observed at hsp70 in ChIP experiments to levels obtained with a fragment from within the bxd PRE as a positive control, and a region upstream of the DRP12 gene as a negative control, in Drosophila embryos (Additional file 10: Fig. S4). The results show that significantly more H3K4me3 is recovered at the hsp70 locus compared to bxd, consistent with hsp70 being actively transcribed in all cells, whereas bxd is expressed only in a subset of cells. During the recovery phase from heat shock, when H3K27me3 levels are highest, they are equivalent to those observed at bxd. Even at the lowest levels of H3K27me3 observed at hsp70 (15 min of heat shock, 120 min of recovery), the levels observed are significantly higher than the negative or IgG controls. Thus, we are confident that the changes we observe in H3K4me3 and K3K27me3 we observe at hsp70 are biologically important.


Our experiments on the role of Asx in regulation of the relative levels of H3K4me3 to H3K27me3 suggest that Asx recruits Trx and E(z) at different temporal stages via interaction with their SET domains (Figs. 9, 6). The mapping data shown in Figs. 1 and 2 confirm the hypothesis that Asx interacts directly with E(z) and Trx in vitro. The mapping data also show that there are two non-overlapping Asx domains that interact with E(z) and Trx SET domains, termed ETSI-1 and ETSI-2 (Fig. 4). Sequence comparison of ETSI-1 and 2 reveals 15% sequence identity (Additional file 8: Fig. S2), suggesting that either there is conservation of 2D structure with clustered amino acid sequence conservation, or that ETSI-1 and 2 domains have a unique interaction mechanism. The third Asx interaction site, TSI (Figs. 3, 4), is a distinct Trx SET domain interaction site, which overlaps the conserved C-terminal atypical PHD motif, consistent with the suggestion that the conserved atypical PHD motif lacks structural features which restricts its binding to the N-terminal tail of H3 [38].

The identification of Asx interaction sites for the SET domains of E(z) and Trx (ETSI-1/2 and TSI) (Fig. 4) is consistent with Asx association with equivalent levels of E(z) and Trx in vivo at 60 to 180 min of recovery (Fig. 6). These findings support the hypothesis that Asx directly regulates H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 levels downstream of the hsp70 promoter (Fig. 9). However, the mapping of 2 SET domain interaction sites suggests that it is unlikely that Trx and E(z) compete to bind Asx. This conclusion is supported by the data in Fig. 2 showing that E(z) and Trx do not co-fractionate after chromatography of nuclear extracts on Bio-Rex 70. These results suggest that Asx association with Trx or E(z) in vivo may be influenced by the different temporal stages of heat shock and recovery. These experiments do not rule out interactions of Asx with domains outside the SET domains of Trx and E(z), but this possibility was not tested.

Comparison of existing structure function analysis of Asx homologs in Drosophila and mammals with our new data allows us to speculate that Asx acts as an ETP by interacting with multiple nucleosome-modifying enzymes to modulate histone modifications. Asx and its mammalian homolog ASXL1 interact with Calypso/BAP1 to form the PR-DUB complex, which deubiquitinates histone H2AK118Ub/H2AK119Ub at the Ubx PRE and promoter [10]. The ASXH domain is conserved between all mammalian ASXL and Drosophila Asx and directly binds the deubiquitinase BAP1 [10, 39]. Interestingly, in mammals the ASXL1 DEUBAD domain (amino acid 238–290) located within the ASXH (amino acid 249–368) domain is required to activate the BAP1 enzymatic function on deubiquinating H2AK119Ub [40, 41]. Unlike Asx, mutation of calypso did not have a significant effect on the relative hsp70 mRNA levels in calypso 2 mutant and wild-type embryos at selected time points of heat shock or recovery (Additional file 11: Fig. S5). Thus, calypso is not required for the activity of Asx at hsp70 during heat-shock induction and recovery.

Both our results on Asx and recent studies on ASXL1 suggest that ETSI-1 site alone is insufficient to maintain the normal H3K27me3 level at target promoters [42]. We therefore suggest that both the ETSI-1 and ETSI-2 regions are required to recruit and/or retain the function of E(z)/EZH2 at target promoters. Consistent with this view, ASXL1 co-immunoprecipitates with the PRC2 components EZH2, SUZ12 and EED [43]. The C-terminal region of ASXL1 aligns to the Asx ETSI-2 with 15% sequence identity (Additional file 8: Fig. S2B), suggesting conservation of function. It is possible that ETSI-1 and ETSI-2 interact independently or cooperatively. In the future, it will be interesting to determine whether each of these domains simultaneously recruits Trx and E(z), whether binding of Trx or E(z) occurs preferentially to ETSI-1 or 2 and whether histone demethylases or histone acetyl transferases also associate with these domains.

One major finding in this study is that Asx is required to repress the transcription of hsp70 during heat stress and recovery. In the first 10 min of heat stress, when transcriptional elongation should predominate over re-initiation, Asx mutants exhibit higher levels of hsp70 transcription compared to controls (Fig. 8), so Asx acts as a governor to prevent rapid increase in the rate of hsp70 transcription. Interestingly, we do not detect any significant change in H3K4me3 levels during this time (Fig. 9), implying that the Asx effect in the first 10 min is Trx independent [23]. Given previous observations that Asx is not recruited to polytene chromosomes in trx mutants and vice versa [44] and that trx mutations abolish induction of heat shock [23], one would predict no heat-shock response in Asx mutants. As noted in “Background,” we would not detect a Trx-dependent effect in our experiments immediately after heat-shock induction because recruitment of Trx and Pol II and initiation of transcription occur many hours earlier in the presence of maternal Asx. We suggest that changes in H3K4me3 levels detected after 15 min of heat stress reflect re-initiation of hsp70 transcription.

Asx may have a previously unreported role in transcriptional elongation of hsp70 that is independent of the catalytic activity of Trx or other H3K4 HMT because Asx mutants have higher transcription compared to wild type in the first 10 min of heat stress that cannot be attributed to changes in levels of H3K4me3. Asx may regulate factors required for hsp70 transcriptional elongation including Mediator, elongation factors (such as Spt5, Spt6 and FACT) or the H3K36 histone methyltransferase activity [18, 20, 22, 45]. Alternatively, Asx may participate in Pol II pausing and retention or release during the 0–10-min heat-shock phase before a Trx-dependent step [46].
Fig. 9

Asx regulates H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 levels at hsp70. Both panels show ChIP-qPCR analysis comparing control rabbit IgG to trimethylated histones in wild-type (blue) and Asx 3 (red) embryos at different times of heat-shock induction and recovery as indicated in the x-axis. The y-axis indicates recovery after ChIP as a percentage of input DNA. The notation for the duration of heat shock/recovery is described in Fig. 7. All data are represented as mean ± SEM with N = 3. (*) P < 0.05. The standard deviation (SD) of each data point is presented in Additional file 12: Table S3 and Additional file 13: Fig. S6. a ChIP-qPCR analysis with trimethylated histone H3K4 antibody. During late heat-shock induction and the first 30 min of recovery, H3K4me3 levels are higher in Asx mutants than wild type. In late recovery, H3K4me3 levels are lower in mutants than wild type. b ChIP-qPCR analysis with trimethylated histone H3K27 antibody. Levels of H3K27me3 are essentially constant in Asx mutants and are significantly lower than wild type at the end of induction and the recovery phases. c Ratio of histone H3K4me3 to H3K27me3 during heat shock and recovery, expressed in arbitrary units, and derived from the data in a, b

From 15 min of heat-shock induction up to 60 min of recovery, Asx is required to govern the rate of hsp70 transcription and changes the ratio of H3K4me3 to H3K27me3. As shown in Fig. 9c, the ratio of H3K4me3/H3K27me3 levels is consistently higher in Asx mutants compared to wild type during this period suggesting that the relative levels of H3K4 and H3K27 trimethylation regulate hsp70 transcription. Alternatively, the ratio of H3K4me3/H3K27me3 may reflect consequences of other events regulated by Asx that lead to changes in the ratio.

From 90 to 180 min after recovery from heat shock, transcription of hsp70 falls in both control and Asx 3 mutant embryos, showing that Asx is not required for repression of hsp70 transcription at this phase (Fig. 8a). By contrast, the PcG gene pho is required for this repression because the level of hsp70 mRNA in pho 1 mutant larvae was significantly higher than in wild-type embryos after 30-min induction/180-min or 300-min recovery, but no significant difference was observed after 30-min induction/60-min recovery after heat shock [24]. Therefore, the timing of Asx regulation of hsp70 transcription does not significantly overlap with the requirement for pho.

Asx was identified first as a PcG gene [4], and subsequent experiments in Drosophila supported this conclusion [5, 6]. To our knowledge, our observations provide the first example where Asx mutations cause simultaneous changes in both H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 at the same locus at the same time. Protein nulls such as Asx 22P4 have no change in global H3K27 trimethylation and show very slight reduction in global H3K4 trimethylation [10]. The increased sensitivity of gene-specific analysis or particular features of hsp70 regulation may allow us to detect clear effects of Asx mutations on relative levels of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 that are not detected in bulk chromatin. Our data do not rule out alternative models could account for the regulation of the H3K4me3 to H3K27me3 levels: (1) Asx acts indirectly via CBP-mediated H3K27 acetylation to block methylation [47, 48]; (2) a role for two other H3K4me3 HMTs, SET1 and Trr, cannot be excluded since both contain SET domains with 50% amino acid sequence identity to the SET domain of Trx (NCBI protein sequences, see web refence below); (3) Asx affects demethylation of H3K27me3 by Jarid2 by recruiting E(z), and its HMT PRC2 subunits Su(z)12, Esc and Jarid2 [49].


The major finding in this study is that Asx interacts directly with E(z) and Trx in vitro and in vivo during heat-shock recovery. Asx is required to repress transcription of the hsp70 locus during heat stress and the first 60 min of recovery by regulating the relative H3K4 and H3K27 trimethylation levels at the promoter. These results are consistent with genetic identification of Asx as an ETP required for both trxG and PcG function.



Polycomb group


trithorax group


enhancer of trithorax and Polycomb


additional sex combs


histone methyl transferase


enhancer of zeste




70-kDa heat-shock proteins


Su(var)3–9, enhancer of zeste and trithorax


C-terminal domain


heat-shock factor


chromatin immunoprecipitation


E(z)/Trx SET domain interaction site


Trx SET domain interaction site


proximity ligation assay


adenosylhomocysteinase 89E


Polycomb repressive deubiquitinase


Authors’ contributions

HWB and AM conceived the study; TL, JWH and SP performed experiments. All authors discussed the results, analyzed the data and commented on drafts of the manuscript. TL, JWH and HWB wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We thank Bloomington Stock Center for fly stocks. We acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Sheryl T. Smith and Maya Kupczyk during the initial phase of this project. We thank Drs. Robert Tjian and Michael Kyba for plasmid vectors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available form the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.


SP was supported by a training program from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) (CA009678). This study was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to HWB. The funders had no role in study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, in the writing or in the decision to submit.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Zoology, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University


  1. Paro R. Imprinting a determined state into the chromatin of Drosophila. Trends Genet. 1990;6(12):416–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kennison JA. Transcriptional activation of Drosophila homeotic genes from distant regulatory elements. Trends Genet. 1993;9(3):75–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brock HW, Fisher CL. Maintenance of gene expression patterns. Dev Dyn. 2005;232(3):633–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jurgens G. A group of genes controlling the spatial expression of the bithorax complex in Drosophila. Nature. 1985;316(6024):153–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Simon J, Peifer M, Bender W, O’Connor M. Regulatory elements of the bithorax complex that control expression along the anterior-posterior axis. EMBO J. 1990;9(12):3945–56.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Sinclair DA, Campbell RB, Nicholls F, Slade E, Brock HW. Genetic analysis of the additional sex combs locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992;130(4):817–25.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Duncan I. The bithorax complex. Annu Rev Genet. 1987;21:285–319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Milne TA, Sinclair DA, Brock HW. The Additional sex combs gene of Drosophila is required for activation and repression of homeotic loci, and interacts specifically with Polycomb and super sex combs. Mol Gen Genet. 1999;261(4–5):753–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell RB, Sinclair DA, Couling M, Brock HW. Genetic interactions and dosage effects of Polycomb group genes of Drosophila. Mol Gen Genet. 1995;246(3):291–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Scheuermann JC, de Ayala Alonso AG, Oktaba K, Ly-Hartig N, McGinty RK, Fraterman S, Wilm M, Muir TW, Muller J. Histone H2A deubiquitinase activity of the Polycomb repressive complex PR-DUB. Nature. 2010;465(7295):243–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Gildea JJ, Lopez R, Shearn A. A screen for new trithorax group genes identified little imaginal discs, the Drosophila melanogaster homologue of human retinoblastoma binding protein 2. Genetics. 2000;156(2):645–63.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Brock HW, van Lohuizen M. The Polycomb group-no longer an exclusive club? Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001;11(2):175–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Muller J, Verrijzer P. Biochemical mechanisms of gene regulation by Polycomb group protein complexes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19(2):150–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schuettengruber B, Martinez AM, Iovino N, Cavalli G. Trithorax group proteins: switching genes on and keeping them active. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12(12):799–814.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tsukiyama T, Becker PB, Wu C. ATP-dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat-shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature. 1994;367(6463):525–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rasmussen EB, Lis JT. In vivo transcriptional pausing and cap formation on three Drosophila heat shock genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(17):7923–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Rougvie AE, Lis JT. The RNA polymerase II molecule at the 5′ end of the uninduced hsp70 gene of D. Melanogaster is transcriptionally engaged. Cell. 1988;54(6):795–804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Boehm AK, Saunders A, Werner J, Lis JT. Transcription factor and polymerase recruitment, modification, and movement on dhsp70 in vivo in the minutes following heat shock. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(21):7628–37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Westwood JT, Wu C. Activation of Drosophila heat shock factor: conformational change associated with a monomer-to-trimer transition. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13(6):3481–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Andrulis ED, Guzman E, Doring P, Werner J, Lis JT. High-resolution localization of Drosophila Spt5 and Spt6 at heat shock genes in vivo: roles in promoter proximal pausing and transcription elongation. Genes Dev. 2000;14(20):2635–49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaplan CD, Morris JR, Wu C, Winston F. Spt5 and spt6 are associated with active transcription and have characteristics of general elongation factors in D. Melanogaster. Genes Dev. 2000;14(20):2623–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Saunders A, Werner J, Andrulis ED, Nakayama T, Hirose S, Reinberg D, Lis JT. Tracking FACT and the RNA polymerase II elongation complex through chromatin in vivo. Science. 2003;301(5636):1094–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith ST, Petruk S, Sedkov Y, Cho E, Tillib S, Canaani E, Mazo A. Modulation of heat shock gene expression by the TAC1 chromatin-modifying complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6(2):162–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Beisel C, Buness A, Roustan-Espinosa IM, Koch B, Schmitt S, Haas SA, Hild M, Katsuyama T, Paro R. Comparing active and repressed expression states of genes controlled by the Polycomb/Trithorax group proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(42):16615–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Sinclair DA, Milne TA, Hodgson JW, Shellard J, Salinas CA, Kyba M, Randazzo F, Brock HW. The Additional sex combs gene of Drosophila encodes a chromatin protein that binds to shared and unique Polycomb group sites on polytene chromosomes. Development. 1998;125(7):1207–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tao H, Liu W, Simmons BN, Harris HK, Cox TC, Massiah MA. Purifying natively folded proteins from inclusion bodies using sarkosyl, Triton X-100, and CHAPS. Biotechniques. 2010;48(1):61–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Leuchowius KJ, Clausson CM, Grannas K, Erbilgin Y, Botling J, Zieba A, Landegren U, Soderberg O. Parallel visualization of multiple protein complexes in individual cells in tumor tissue. Mol Cell Proteom. 2013;12(6):1563–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Soderberg O, Leuchowius KJ, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, Weibrecht I, Larsson LG, Landegren U. Characterizing proteins and their interactions in cells and tissues using the in situ proximity ligation assay. Methods. 2008;45(3):227–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Klasener K, Maity PC, Hobeika E, Yang J, Reth M. B cell activation involves nanoscale receptor reorganizations and inside-out signaling by Syk. Elife. 2014;3:e02069.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Beck SA, Falconer E, Catching A, Hodgson JW, Brock HW. Cell cycle defects in polyhomeotic mutants are caused by abrogation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Dev Biol. 2010;339(2):320–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Petruk S, Sedkov Y, Riley KM, Hodgson J, Schweisguth F, Hirose S, Jaynes JB, Brock HW, Mazo A. Transcription of bxd noncoding RNAs promoted by trithorax represses Ubx in cis by transcriptional interference. Cell. 2006;127(6):1209–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson JD, Denisenko O, Bomsztyk K. Protocol for the fast chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) method. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(1):179–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dillon SC, Zhang X, Trievel RC, Cheng X. The SET-domain protein superfamily: protein lysine methyltransferases. Genome Biol. 2005;6(8):227.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Frangioni JV, Neel BG. Solubilization and purification of enzymatically active glutathione S-transferase (pGEX) fusion proteins. Anal Biochem. 1993;210(1):179–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kauzmann W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem. 1959;14:1–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Greenwood C, Ruff D, Kirvell S, Johnson G, Dhillon HS, Bustin SA. Proximity assays for sensitive quantification of proteins. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2015;4:10–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Lakhotia SC, Prasanth KV. Tissue- and development-specific induction and turnover of hsp70 transcripts from loci 87A and 87C after heat shock and during recovery in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol. 2002;205(Pt 3):345–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Aravind L, Iyer LM. The HARE-HTH and associated domains: novel modules in the coordination of epigenetic DNA and protein modifications. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(1):119–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Fisher CL, Berger J, Randazzo F, Brock HW. A human homolog of Additional sex combs, ADDITIONAL SEX COMBS-LIKE 1, maps to chromosome 20q11. Gene. 2003;306:115–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sahtoe DD, van Dijk WJ, Ekkebus R, Ovaa H, Sixma TK. BAP1/ASXL1 recruitment and activation for H2A deubiquitination. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10292.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Katoh M. Functional and cancer genomics of ASXL family members. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:299.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Balasubramani A, Larjo A, Bassein JA, Chang X, Hastie RB, Togher SM, Lahdesmaki H, Rao A. Cancer-associated ASXL1 mutations may act as gain-of-function mutations of the ASXL1-BAP1 complex. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7307.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Abdel-Wahab O, Adli M, LaFave LM, Gao J, Hricik T, Shih AH, Pandey S, Patel JP, Chung YR, Koche R, Perna F, Zhao X, Taylor JE, Park CY, Carroll M, Melnick A, Nimer SD, Jaffe JD, Aifantis I, Bernstein BE, Levine RL. ASXL1 mutations promote myeloid transformation through loss of PRC2-mediated gene repression. Cancer Cell. 2012;22(2):180–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Petruk S, Smith ST, Sedkov Y, Mazo A. Association of trxG and PcG proteins with the bxd maintenance element depends on transcriptional activity. Development. 2008;135(14):2383–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Park JM, Werner J, Kim JM, Lis JT, Kim YJ. Mediator, not holoenzyme, is directly recruited to the heat shock promoter by HSF upon heat shock. Mol Cell. 2001;8(1):9–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Samarakkody A, Abbas A, Scheidegger A, Warns J, Nnoli O, Jokinen B, Zarns K, Kubat B, Dhasarathy A, Nechaev S. RNA polymerase II pausing can be retained or acquired during activation of genes involved in the epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(8):3938–49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Tie F, Banerjee R, Stratton CA, Prasad-Sinha J, Stepanik V, Zlobin A, Diaz MO, Scacheri PC, Harte PJ. CBP-mediated acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 antagonizes Drosophila Polycomb silencing. Development. 2009;136(18):3131–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Petruk S, Sedkov Y, Smith S, Tillib S, Kraevski V, Nakamura T, Canaani E, Croce CM, Mazo A. Trithorax and dCBP acting in a complex to maintain expression of a homeotic gene. Science. 2001;294(5545):1331–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Herz HM, Mohan M, Garrett AS, Miller C, Casto D, Zhang Y, Seidel C, Haug JS, Florens L, Washburn MP, Yamaguchi M, Shiekhattar R, Shilatifard A. Polycomb repressive complex 2-dependent and -independent functions of Jarid2 in transcriptional regulation in Drosophila. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32(9):1683–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Web References

    1. Trr; Accessed 17 June 2016.
    2. SET1; Accessed 17 June 2016.
    3. Trx; Accessed 17 June 2016.


© The Author(s) 2017