Skip to main content

MS_HistoneDB, a manually curated resource for proteomic analysis of human and mouse histones



Histones and histone variants are essential components of the nuclear chromatin. While mass spectrometry has opened a large window to their characterization and functional studies, their identification from proteomic data remains challenging. Indeed, the current interpretation of mass spectrometry data relies on public databases which are either not exhaustive (Swiss-Prot) or contain many redundant entries (UniProtKB or NCBI). Currently, no protein database is ideally suited for the analysis of histones and the complex array of mammalian histone variants.


We propose two proteomics-oriented manually curated databases for mouse and human histone variants. We manually curated >1700 gene, transcript and protein entries to produce a non-redundant list of 83 mouse and 85 human histones. These entries were annotated in accordance with the current nomenclature and unified with the “HistoneDB2.0 with Variants” database. This resource is provided in a format that can be directly read by programs used for mass spectrometry data interpretation. In addition, it was used to interpret mass spectrometry data acquired on histones extracted from mouse testis. Several histone variants, which had so far only been inferred by homology or detected at the RNA level, were detected by mass spectrometry, confirming the existence of their protein form.


Mouse and human histone entries were collected from different databases and subsequently curated to produce a non-redundant protein-centric resource, MS_HistoneDB. It is dedicated to the proteomic study of histones in mouse and human and will hopefully facilitate the identification and functional study of histone variants.


In eukaryotic cells, the nucleosome is the basic unit of chromatin organization. Nucleosomes are composed of an octamer of four core histones, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4, wrapped by DNA [1]. An additional linker histone, H1, can be deposited near the DNA entry–exit points [2, 3]. The dynamic organization of chromatin impacts many cellular events, including the regulation of gene transcription, DNA replication and the maintenance of genome integrity through DNA repair mechanisms [4, 5]. These pathways signal to chromatin by different mechanisms including DNA methylation, non-coding regulatory RNAs, recruitment of remodelling factors, incorporation of histone variants and covalent modifications of histones [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Histones are decorated by many post-translational modifications, the most common of which are acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation and ubiquitination [13, 14]. Some of these modifications favour transcription activation, while others are associated with repression of transcription [15]. In addition to transcription, histone modifications are involved in numerous regulatory circuits, such as chromosome dynamics [16], DNA repair [17] or the establishment and maintenance of heterochromatin [18]. Furthermore, dedicated molecular machineries can load and mobilize nucleosomes along the DNA (for review, see [4]). These chromatin remodellers play an important role in the regulation of transcription by organizing the nucleosomal positions at critical regulatory regions [19, 20]. Finally, non-allelic variants of canonical histones, named histone variants, are important elements in chromatin signalling pathways [21, 22]. Some variants are general players—expressed ubiquitously, contributing to various aspects of transcription and epigenetic regulations—while others are only expressed in certain cell types, such as germ cells [23]. Some of these variants are specifically expressed during sperm differentiation and are annotated TS for testis-specific [24,25,26]. Altogether, histone variants have been described for H3, H2A, H2B and H1; H4 is the only histone for which no variant has been identified in mammals, but some organisms, such as the urochordate Oikopleura dioica, ciliates and trypanosomes, have evolved H4 variants [10, 27,28,29].

Histone variants were initially discovered using classical biochemical approaches. Recently, the development of mass spectrometry (MS) techniques, with constant increases in sensitivity and speed of analysis, has facilitated their identification and functional characterization [14, 30,31,32,33,34]. In order to utilize these technologies, histones are first biochemically enriched taking advantage of their highly basic nature. Then, they are proteolyzed with proteases to form short peptides, which are then analysed by MS/MS. The acquired MS/MS spectra are interpreted and converted into amino acid sequences, from which the identity of the original histone protein and the possible presence of post-translational modifications on specific residues can be determined [35]. However, these analyses still remain restricted for a number of reasons. One of these is that the interpretation of MS/MS spectra relies on matching experimental data to theoretical peptide sequences obtained by an in silico proteolysis of a list of proteins. Therefore, the content of the theoretical protein sequence database conditions the interpretation of the experimental spectra and the subsequent identification of histones. Classical databases such as Swiss-Prot, trEMBL and NCBI are usually used with success. However, histones have not been precisely annotated in these resources. Manually curated databases such as Swiss-Prot lack several histones, while others, such as trEMBL or NCBI protein database, are more extensively populated with non-reviewed data. The latter contain more histone entries, but the degree of redundancy and the precision of the descriptions can make protein identification results difficult to interpret. Finally, naming of histones has been recently revisited with a new unified nomenclature [36]. The recent release of HistoneDB 2.0 consolidated the sequence information of a large variety of histones and their sequence variants in many organisms [37]. However, it has not yet been integrated in the above databases and the same variant can go by different names. For instance, the coding gene H2afb1 refers to proteins H2A.L.2 or H2A.Lap3 in the literature and to H2A-Bbd type 1 in the NCBI RefSeq and UniProtKB databases [38, 39]. In addition, a different protein coded by Gm14920 is also named H2A.Bbd.1 in other publications [40]. Here, a unified name is presented to identify uniquely each ambiguous entry and is also associated with its other names to facilitate its relationship with previously published work.

We have collected redundant histone entries from a number of public databases, gathering >700 entries for mouse and >1000 entries for human histones. We manually curated these lists to obtain a final count of 83 and 85 histone entries for mouse or human, respectively. Their annotations have been revisited to match the current histone nomenclature in accordance with the new resource “HistoneDB 2.0—with variants” [37]. About 30% of these entries have a fuzzy UniProtKB protein annotation, such as “predicted” or “inferred by homology”, and we performed MS analysis to clearly identify several of these imprecisely characterized entries (some of which had formerly been described to be detected by western blot).


MS_HistoneDB, a resource containing unique and non-redundant histones

Our initial aim with this work was to generate an exhaustive and non-redundant resource that would facilitate histone analysis by MS. We identified and collected all the information available on human and mouse histones from the public databases of NCBI, Ensembl and UniProtKB (Table 1). This work was aided by the recent release of an updated version of the Histone Database, named “HistoneDB 2.0—with variants” [37]. This database contains 38,664 entries from 1624 species, with 761 and 1039 entries for mouse and human, respectively. In addition, several histones were also considered based on published articles [41,42,43,44,45].

Table 1 Histone entries in various publicly accessible databases

The dataflow is presented in Fig. 1a. This curating process is exemplified with human H2A.Z on Fig. 1b. A total of 23 entries were collected from Swiss-Prot, Uniprot-trEMBL and NCBI databases. Fourteen were duplicated and removed to obtain nine unique entries, which were annotated as H2A.Z.1 and eight spliced isoforms of H2A.Z.2 using the release R86 of the Ensembl database (Fig. 1c, d). In summary, the following rules were applied. First, each entry is protein-centric and therefore defined by the final product, a unique mature protein. Second, it must be associated with gene, transcript and protein accession numbers in NCBI and/or Ensembl, unless published data document its existence. Third, histone names are not always consistent within the existing public databases. Some were renamed following the Talbert et al. nomenclature and in agreement with the HistoneDB 2.0 resource as detailed in the following sections [36, 37]. The final list of histone entries is presented as a phylogenetic tree in Fig. 2 and in Tables 2 and 3 for mouse and human species, respectively. We did not provide here an extensive review of the functional roles of each histone variant, which are already available elsewhere [4, 21, 23, 36, 46].

Fig. 1

Methodology used to create a manually curated MS_HistoneDB resource. a Representation of the dataflow used to generate the MS_HistoneDB resource. b Example of the dataflow for human H2A.Z histone variants. The number of entries at each step is indicated. c Graphical representation of the exons of human H2A.Z.2 spliced isoforms. d Sequence alignment of human H2A.Z variant isoforms

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic trees for mouse and human histone entries in MS_HistoneDB. Please note that for clarity, some putative spliced isoforms of canonical histones were not included, as well as other very short spliced isoforms for some histone variants. The full lists are presented in Tables 2 and 3. Gene names are indicated in italic to identify histone isoforms grouped under a generic term (see Tables 2 and 3; Additional files 4, 5). Black dots highlight testis-specific variants

Table 2 Manually curated list of mouse histones
Table 3 Manually curated list of human histones

Canonical histones

Canonical histones constitute the bulk of the proteins that organize DNA into chromatin. They are synthesized and incorporated into chromatin during replication [41]. Their expression is carefully regulated to provide enough proteins to be loaded onto newly synthesized DNA while preventing the accumulation of free histones [47, 48]. For this reason, they are denominated “replication-dependent” and their mRNA adopts a unique organization (for review, see [49]). They are the only RNA polymerase II transcripts which are not polyadenylated but instead possess a 3′ stem-loop, formed during the maturation of their mRNA and which is essential for their regulation [49]. However, polyadenylation events of replication-dependent histone mRNA have recently been identified in terminally differentiated cells and suggested to provide a replacement pool of canonical histones [50].

H2A and H2B canonical histones have minor sequence variations, and it is not clear yet whether these have a functional significance [51]. MS analysis can differentiate between these isoforms and their denomination had to be adapted for proteomic analysis. Here, we propose that canonical H2A and H2B isoforms can be regrouped under the generic term “canonical H2A” or “canonical H2B”, complemented by the gene name of each isoform (Tables 2, 3).

Histone variants are mostly replication-independent

In contrast to canonical histones, almost all histone variants are synthesized independently of the cell cycle and named “replication-independent” [49]. Their mRNA is polyadenylated and these histones are incorporated into chromatin at any time of the cell cycle. Two exceptions are the testis-specific (TS) histone variants TS H2A and TS H2B, which possess a 3′ stem-loop in their mRNA. For this reason, they have been classified as replication-dependent [49] even if expressed in differentiating germ cells which replicate their DNA only once before meiosis.

Spliced and putative isoforms

More than 40 spliced isoforms for all mouse and human histones are present in the Ensembl database. However, this information, mainly based on transcriptional data, remains questionable; notably whether the corresponding proteins are expressed and incorporated into chromatin is uncertain. Some spliced isoforms correspond to very short isoforms that lack the globular domain and are probably, if expressed, non-functional (mouse: cenH3-CENPA.s2, cenH3-CENPA.s3, cenH3-CENPA.s4, cenH3-CENPA.s5, OO H1.8.s.4, OO H1.8.s.5, H2A.Z.1.s3, H2A.Z.1.s4, H2A.Z.2.s2; human: H2A.J.s3, H2A.Z.2.s7, H2A.Z.2.s8, canonical H2B.s2, cenH3-CENPA.s2). Even though their expression remains highly uncertain, they have been included in MS_HistoneDB for their identification by MS to be possible. Observing the presence of a shorter non-functional sequence at the expense of the full-length histone would indeed constitute interesting information. Following the same rationale, several putative isoforms or pseudogenes have been included in this resource (Tables 2, 3). Their detection by MS will constitute an indispensable step to confirm the expression of their protein form.

H1 histones

H1 histones (or linker histones) are different from core histones with respect to their structure, function and evolution. Therefore, it is not possible to single out one of its isoforms as canonical. H1 variants are known to encompass isoforms named H1.0–H1.10. H1.1–H1.5 from histone gene cluster 1 and orphan genes H1.0 (H1°) and H1.10 are usually referred to as somatic variants [36]. The linker variant H1.0 has been described to be involved in cell differentiation (for review [2, 52]). H1.10 has been identified in human and plays an essential role for mitotic progression [53]. H1 variants also include the TS proteins TS H1.6 [54], TS H1.7 [55, 56], TS H1.9 [57, 58] and the oocyte-specific OO H1.8 variant [59, 60]. Finally, a new mouse entry, H1.11, was identified here while performing an in silico search using sequence alignments.

H2A variants

H2A variants comprise H2A.X, H2A.Z, macro-H2A and a number of TS variants, TS H2A, H2A.L/H2A.P and H2A.B.

Only one H2A.X protein has been described; this variant is involved in double-strand break repair, genome stability and chromatin remodelling and silencing in male meiosis [61,62,63,64]. H2A.Z is involved in transcription regulation and is encoded by two different genes, H2afz and H2afv [43]. In mouse, four putative spliced isoforms may be expected in addition to the two original sequences, while in human eight H2A.Z.2 isoforms have been suggested, of which two have been demonstrated to be stable at the protein level [65]. The specific functional roles of these isoforms are not well understood yet, but in some specific tissues, such as in the brain, some H2A.Z spliced isoforms could provide context-specific signalling information [65].

Macro-H2A is the largest histone variant with a long C-terminal domain [66]. This histone variant is associated with transcription repression, although recent evidence suggests that in some conditions it may also promote transcription (reviewed in [51]). Macro-H2A is known to be encoded by two or three different genes, for human and mouse, respectively, some of which are differentially spliced. These variable forms allow differential binding of NAD [67].

Finally, many H2A variants are specifically expressed in the testis. First, TS H2A.1 was originally identified in 1982 in the testis, where it plays an important role and was later detected in the ovary [41, 68,69,70,71].

Fourteen other mouse TS H2A variants have been grouped into three main classes, H2A.L, H2A.B and H2A.P (Fig. 3). This class also regroups human variants, with two H2A.B and one H2A.P proteins (Fig. 3). They are involved in transcription regulation and the final chromatin reorganization during post-meiotic differentiation of sperm cells [26, 38, 39]. The mouse variants have been described by different research groups [38, 39], and a denomination used here follows previous publications [36, 37]. When potential protein products of different genes have only minor sequence variations and no functional difference has been characterized, we grouped them under the name with the same number suffix (e.g. H2A.L.1); however, the gene name is provided in the name of the entry as the second qualifier. Future studies might warrant splitting of such groups of proteins if functional differences between the members are detected. Currently, H2A.B.2 and H2A.B.3 are proposed to be numbered following their gene name, i.e. H2AFB2 and H2AFB3, respectively. In 2007, new TS H2A variants were identified and named H2AL1 and H2AL2. [38]. A few years later, these histones were independently identified and named H2A.Lap2 and H2A.Lap3, respectively [39]. This latter work also reported the identification and functional characterization of a third member baptized H2A.Lap1 which falls into H2A.B group and is proposed to be regrouped with the highly similar protein H2A.B.3. H2A.L.3 was originally identified by S. Khochbin’s group [38] and is the same as H2A.Lap4, also identified by D. Tremethick’s group [39]. However, it forms a separate phylogenetic clade in placental mammals and is named H2A.P here according to [36].

Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree of the mouse and human H2A.L, H2A.B and H2A.P histone variants

H2B variants

Variants TS H2B.1, H2B.L and H2B.W were first identified as TS. In the testes, these proteins are involved in the chromatin-to-protamine transition [38, 69, 72, 73]. Then, TS H2B.1 and TS H2A.1 were also identified in human oocytes, where they favour the generation of induced pluripotent cells [70, 71]. In human, some genes (e.g. H2BFM, H2BFS) still await characterization and have been denoted as putative variants in this work (Table 3).

H3 variants

H3 has several isoforms: H3.1 and H3.2 are replication-dependent; H3.3 is considered to be a replication-independent histone variant, while TS H3.4 and H3.5 are TS [74, 75]. Several new isoforms of H3.3 were included in the database developed here along with two other human H3 histone variants, H3.X and H3.Y [44].

CenH3/CENPA is a well-known centromeric H3 variant with many spliced isoforms. Its name has been the subject of heated discussion, which is out of the scope of our work [36, 76, 77]. We therefore propose to use both names, cenH3-CENPA, until a consensus has been reached by the community.

Generation of MS-based databases

De novo MS data interpretation methods are naive and do not rely on pre-existing databases. However, MS data acquired on histones are generally matched to a database containing all the protein sequences that could theoretically be found in the sample. Using this approach, a given histone protein cannot be identified if its sequence is not present in the database explored by the MS/MS data interpretation software. We used MS_HistoneDB to create a new search space dedicated to the analysis of histones. Basically, mouse or human non-redundant and well-annotated Swiss-Prot FASTA files were cleared of their histone sequences and then repopulated using MS_HistoneDB. This resource is included as Additional files 1 and 2, providing resources to study histones in mouse and human samples, respectively.

Identification of new histones in mouse

About 30% of the proteins in MS_HistoneDB have imprecise protein annotations in UniProtKB and are presented in Tables 4 and 5. These tables regroup histones that are annotated in the UniProtKB and NCBI databases as “inferred from homology” or “predicted”. Even though a certain number of these histones have already been described in publications, which provide clear evidence of their existence at mRNA and protein levels, they may not have been identified by MS yet. This could explain their poor annotation status in UniProtKB.

Table 4 Mouse histone variants with poor annotation status in the UniProtKB database
Table 5 Human histone variants with poor annotation status in the UniProtKB database

At the RNA level, almost all histone variants have been detected in the testis [38,39,40, 55, 57, 68, 78,79,80,81]. Moreover, the expression profile of the mouse H2A.L.1 isoforms which are described in this study has been explored. RNA-seq data from nine mouse tissues have been obtained from a recently published dataset [82]. Expression data were available for 7 out of the 8 H2A.L.1 mouse histone entries and confirm that all of them are mainly expressed in the testis, similarly to H2A.L.2 and H2A.P (Fig. 4a) [38, 39]. Gene expression profiles during spermatogenesis have been obtained from Ref. [83]. It also confirms that H2A.L.1 isoforms are expressed in the post-meiotic stage in spermatids, similarly to H2A.L.2 and H2A.P (Figs. 3c, 4b) [38, 39].

Fig. 4

Mouse H2A.L, H2A.B and H2A.P isoforms are expressed in the post-meiotic stages of spermatogenesis. a Expression profile of a selection of H2A.L, H2A.B and H2A.P genes across mouse tissues. All of them are testis-specific. Data were extracted using gene names provided in Table 2 and Additional file 4 from a dataset downloaded from Expression Atlas [87] and published in Ref. [82]. b Expression profiles of a selection of H2A.L, H2A.B and H2A.P genes during mouse spermatogenesis, revealing a maximum expression in the post-meiotic stage. Data have been obtained from Ref. [83]. Lepto leptotene, Zygo zygotene. c Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel loaded with histones extracted from whole testis and elongating spermatids. d Peptides of the mouse H2A.L histone variants identified by mass spectrometry analysis (identified peptides are highlighted in red boxes)

We next decided to test whether MS_HistoneDB would allow the identification by MS of histone entries with imprecise protein annotation using mouse testis. Histones were purified from whole testis or from elongating spermatids (Fig. 4c). Mass spectrometry analysis combined with MS_HistoneDB allowed identification of nine of these poorly annotated proteins (Table 4; Additional file 3). Each newly MS-identified variant was detected by 1–10 specific peptide sequences. The current guidelines for the identification of previously undetected human proteins (“missing proteins”) require the identification of two different peptide sequences of at least nine amino acids in length [84]. To stringently apply the same rules to validate new histone variants would be demanding, given the very high level of sequence homology between some variants. However, out of the nine histone variants detected here for the first time at the protein level by MS-based approaches, six were identified with at least two non-overlapping peptides of length ≥9 amino acids. Almost all the newly identified variants are TS. This analysis thus confirmed the existence of H2A.L.1 encoded by H2al1b in mouse testes (Fig. 4d). In addition, this analysis confirmed the existence of the histone variant H3.3 encoded by the gene Gm10257, for which a specific peptide has been identified, even if its corresponding NCBI protein record has been recently removed (XP_003084990.1).

Other variants may not be detectable by MS in our analysis. For example, a trypsin digestion does not generate any peptides distinguishing mouse H2al1k protein from highly homologous H2A.L.1 variants. Its specific detection would require a more extensive analytical work, e.g. using an alternative protease for protein sample processing, which is beyond the scope of the current work.


MS is a powerful technique to identify histones, their variants and their post-translational modifications but relies on databases with contradictory naming and excessive redundancy. Here we exhaustively collected histone sequences for mouse and human and used manual curation to establish a protein-centric list, MS_HistoneDB, dedicated to the proteomic study of mouse and human histones. Histone variants whose protein status is uncertain in UniProtKB and NCBI but whose protein existence has been established by experimental evidence described in the literature have been included. This work confirmed the expression of isoforms of previously identified TS histone variants and allowed the detection of one H3.3 isoform whose status was so uncertain that its record had been deleted from the NCBI protein database. We hope that this resource will facilitate the study of histone variants, especially by MS, and their functional roles in physiological and pathological contexts.


Phylogenetic tree representation

Multiple sequence alignments of mouse and human histones were performed using Clustal Omega [85]. Tree data were downloaded in aln format and displayed with iTOLv3 [86].

Analysis of RNA-seq data

Tissue-specific expression data were obtained from Huntley et al. [82] through the Expression Atlas Repository [87]. RNA-seq data at different stages of spermatogenesis were obtained from da Cruz et al. [83]. Data were imported and treated in R using the pheatmap library (

Purification of histones from mouse testis

Histones were extracted from two types of biological samples, namely whole testis and elongated spermatids, to maximize the number of histone variants identified at specific maturation stages of male germ cells. Pure fractions of spermatid nuclei were obtained by sonicating mouse testes, as previously described [38]. Histones were isolated from testis cells and spermatids using sulfuric acid [38] or saline extraction [88]. They were then separated by SDS-PAGE, and proteins were visualized by Coomassie staining.

Sample preparation and analysis by MS

Histones were reduced and alkylated as described previously [89]. Histones were either derivatized with propionic anhydride before and after in-gel trypsin digestion [90], or only submitted to trypsin digestion [89]. The dried extracted peptides were resuspended in 2.5% acetonitrile and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid and analysed via online nano-LC–MS/MS using an Ultimate 3000 LC system coupled to an LTQ-Orbitrap instrument (CID fragmentation mode) or a Q Exactive Plus instrument (HCD fragmentation mode) (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Protein sequence database search and manual verification

MS RAW files produced by LC–MS/MS analysis of proteolyzed histones were processed as follows. All MS/MS spectra were submitted to the Mascot program (version 2.5.1) for searching against the MS_HistoneDB protein sequence database. The parse rules for MS_HistoneDB Fasta files in Mascot are using the accession rule >\([^]*\) and the description rule \(.*\). In addition, the taxonomy and sequence report sources are indicated as “Swiss-Prot FASTA” and “FASTA file”, respectively. No taxonomy was specified when using MS_HistoneDB with Mascot Daemon.

Classical histone modifications were included in the variable modifications: N-terminal protein acetylation; Lys acetylation; and Lys and Arg mono- or di-methylation. For all Mascot searches, the tolerance on mass measurement was set to 5 ppm for peptides and to 0.6 or 0.025 Da for fragment ions when considering LTQ-Orbitrap or Q Exactive acquisitions, respectively. Up to four tryptic missed cleavages were allowed for samples that were not propionylated in vitro, as trypsin does not cleave acetylated lysine, a frequent modification. The enzyme ArgC and up to two missed cleavages were specified for the interpretation of data acquired on propionylated samples. All MS/MS spectra leading to the identification of tryptic peptides specific to newly described variants were carefully manually examined: all major intensity fragment peaks had to be interpreted in terms of y/b ions; a continuous sequence of at least five amino acids had to be read in all cases for validation. Proteomics data are available from ProteomeXchange (PXD005489).



collision-induced dissociation


text-based format for representing protein sequences


higher-energy collisional dissociation


mass spectrometry


tandem mass spectrometry, used to fragment ions


coupling between liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry


northern blot


polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis




western blot


  1. 1.

    Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 1997;389:251–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Izzo A, Schneider R. The role of linker histone H1 modifications in the regulation of gene expression and chromatin dynamics. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1859:486–95.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bednar J, Hamiche A, Dimitrov S. H1–nucleosome interactions and their functional implications. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1859:436–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Venkatesh S, Workman JL. Histone exchange, chromatin structure and the regulation of transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16:178–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Seeber A, Gasser SM. Chromatin organization and dynamics in double-strand break repair. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016;43:9–16.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yong W-S, Hsu F-M, Chen P-Y. Profiling genome-wide DNA methylation. Epigenet Chromatin. 2016;9:26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Almouzni G, Cedar H. Maintenance of epigenetic information. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8:a019372.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Böhmdorfer G, Wierzbicki AT. Control of chromatin structure by long noncoding RNA. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:623–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hota SK, Bruneau BG. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling during mammalian development. Development. 2016;143:2882–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Talbert PB, Henikoff S. Histone variants—ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:264–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Badeaux AI, Shi Y. Emerging roles for chromatin as a signal integration and storage platform. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:211–24.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Smith E, Shilatifard A. The chromatin signaling pathway: diverse mechanisms of recruitment of histone-modifying enzymes and varied biological outcomes. Mol Cell. 2010;40:689–701.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Huang H, Sabari BR, Garcia BA, Allis CD, Zhao Y. SnapShot: histone modifications. Cell. 2014;159(458–458):e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhao Y, Garcia BA. Comprehensive catalog of currently documented histone modifications. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a025064.

  15. 15.

    Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21:381–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Antonin W, Neumann H. Chromosome condensation and decondensation during mitosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2016;40:15–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    House NCM, Koch MR, Freudenreich CH. Chromatin modifications and DNA repair: beyond double-strand breaks. Front Genet. 2014;5:15966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Harr JC, Gonzalez-Sandoval A, Gasser SM. Histones and histone modifications in perinuclear chromatin anchoring: from yeast to man. EMBO Rep. 2016;17:139–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yen K, Vinayachandran V, Pugh BF. SWR-C and INO80 chromatin remodelers recognize nucleosome-free regions near +1 nucleosomes. Cell. 2013;154:1246–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Krietenstein N, Wal M, Watanabe S, Park B, Peterson CL, Pugh BF, et al. Genomic nucleosome organization reconstituted with pure proteins. Cell. 2016;167:709–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Weber CM, Henikoff S. Histone variants: dynamic punctuation in transcription. Genes Dev. 2014;28:672–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zink L-M, Hake SB. Histone variants: nuclear function and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016;37:82–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Maze I, Noh K-M, Soshnev AA, Allis CD. Every amino acid matters: essential contributions of histone variants to mammalian development and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:259–71.

  24. 24.

    Govin J, Caron C, Lestrat C, Rousseaux S, Khochbin S. The role of histones in chromatin remodelling during mammalian spermiogenesis. Eur J Biochem. 2004;271:3459–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rathke C, Baarends WM, Awe S, Renkawitz-Pohl R. Chromatin dynamics during spermiogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1839:155–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Boussouar F, Rousseaux S, Khochbin S. A new insight into male genome reprogramming by histone variants and histone code. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:3499–502.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Moosmann A, Campsteijn C, Jansen PW, Nasrallah C, Raasholm M, Stunnenberg HG, et al. Histone variant innovation in a rapidly evolving chordate lineage. BMC Evol. 2011;11:208.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Siegel TN, Hekstra DR, Kemp LE, Figueiredo LM, Lowell JE, Fenyo D, et al. Four histone variants mark the boundaries of polycistronic transcription units in Trypanosoma brucei. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1063–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bernhard D, Schlegel M. Evolution of histone H4 and H3 genes in different ciliate lineages. J Mol Evol. 1998;46:344–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Boyne MT, Pesavento JJ, Mizzen CA, Kelleher NL. Precise characterization of human histones in the H2A gene family by top down mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res. 2006;5:248–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Phanstiel D, Brumbaugh J, Berggren W, Conard K, Feng X, Levenstein M, et al. Mass spectrometry identifies and quantifies 74 unique histone H4 isoforms in differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:4098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Siuti N, Kelleher NL. Decoding protein modifications using to–down mass spectrometry. Nat Methods. 2007;4:817–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Huang H, Lin S, Garcia BA, Zhao Y. Quantitative proteomic analysis of histone modifications. Chem Rev. 2015;115:2376–418.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tan M, Luo H, Lee S, Jin F, Yang JS, Montellier E, et al. Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell. 2011;146:1016–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cox J, Mann M. Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:273–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Talbert PB, Ahmad K, Almouzni G, Ausió J, Berger F, Bhalla PL, et al. A unified phylogeny-based nomenclature for histone variants. Epigenet Chromatin. 2012;5:7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Draizen EJ, Shaytan AK, Mariño-Ramírez L, Talbert PB, Landsman D, Panchenko AR. HistoneDB 2.0: a histone database with variants—an integrated resource to explore histones and their variants. Database. 2016;2016:baw014.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Govin J, Escoffier E, Rousseaux S, Kuhn L, Ferro M, Thévenon J, et al. Pericentric heterochromatin reprogramming by new histone variants during mouse spermiogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2007;176:283–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Soboleva TA, Nekrasov M, Pahwa A, Williams R, Huttley GA, Tremethick DJ. A unique H2A histone variant occupies the transcriptional start site of active genes. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:25–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ishibashi T, Li A, Eirin-Lopez JM, Zhao M, Missiaen K, Abbott DW, et al. H2A.Bbd: an X-chromosome-encoded histone involved in mammalian spermiogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:1780–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Marzluff WF, Gongidi P, Woods KR, Jin J, Maltais LJ. The human and mouse replication-dependent histone genes. Genomics. 2002;80:487–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gautier T, Abbott DW, Molla A, Verdel A, Ausió J, Dimitrov S. Histone variant H2ABbd confers lower stability to the nucleosome. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:715–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dryhurst D, Ishibashi T, Rose KL, Eirín-López JM, McDonald D, Silva-Moreno B, et al. Characterization of the histone H2A.Z-1 and H2A.Z-2 isoforms in vertebrates. BMC Biol. 2009;7:86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wiedemann SM, Mildner SN, Bonisch C, Israel L, Maiser A, Matheisl S, et al. Identification and characterization of two novel primate-specific histone H3 variants, H3.X and H3.Y. J Cell Biol. 2010;190:777–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bonisch C, Hake SB. Histone H2A variants in nucleosomes and chromatin: more or less stable? Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:10719–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Vardabasso C, Hasson D, Ratnakumar K, Chung C-Y, Duarte LF, Bernstein E. Histone variants: emerging players in cancer biology. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:379–404.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sittman DB, Graves RA, Marzluff WF. Histone mRNA concentrations are regulated at the level of transcription and mRNA degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1983;80:1849–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Günesdogan U, Jäckle H, Herzig A. Histone supply regulates S phase timing and cell cycle progression. Elife. 2014;3:e02443.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Marzluff WF, Wagner EJ, Duronio RJ. Metabolism and regulation of canonical histone mRNAs: life without a poly(A) tail. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:843–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lyons SM, Cunningham CH, Welch JD, Groh B, Guo AY, Wei B, et al. A subset of replication-dependent histone mRNAs are expressed as polyadenylated RNAs in terminally differentiated tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:9190–205.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Shaytan AK, Landsman D, Panchenko AR. Nucleosome adaptability conferred by sequence and structural variations in histone H2A–H2B dimers. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2015;32:48–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Khochbin S. Histone H1 diversity: bridging regulatory signals to linker histone function. Gene. 2001;271:1–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Takata H, Matsunaga S, Morimoto A, Ono-Maniwa R, Uchiyama S, Fukui K. H1.X with different properties from other linker histones is required for mitotic progression. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:3783–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Drabent B, Bode C, Doenecke D. Structure and expression of the mouse testicular H1 histone gene (H1t). Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Gene Struct Expr. 1993;1216:311–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Martianov I, Brancorsini S, Catena R, Gansmuller A, Kotaja N, Parvinen M, et al. Polar nuclear localization of H1T2, a histone H1 variant, required for spermatid elongation and DNA condensation during spermiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:2808–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tanaka H, Iguchi N, Isotani A, Kitamura K, Toyama Y, Matsuoka Y, et al. HANP1/H1T2, a novel histone H1-like protein involved in nuclear formation and sperm fertility. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:7107–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Yan W, Ma L, Burns KH, Matzuk MM. HILS1 is a spermatid-specific linker histone H1-like protein implicated in chromatin remodeling during mammalian spermiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10546–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Iguchi N, Tanaka H, Yomogida K, Nishimune Y. Isolation and characterization of a novel cDNA encoding a DNA-binding protein (Hils1) specifically expressed in testicular haploid germ cells. Int J Androl. 2003;26:354–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Tanaka M, Hennebold JD, Macfarlane J, Adashi EY. A mammalian oocyte-specific linker histone gene H1oo: homology with the genes for the oocyte-specific cleavage stage histone (cs-H1) of sea urchin and the B4/H1M histone of the frog. Development. 2001;128:655–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Tanaka M, Kihara M, Hennebold JD, Eppig JJ, Viveiros MM, Emery BR, et al. H1FOO is coupled to the initiation of oocytic growth. Biol Reprod. 2005;72:135–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:5858–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Celeste A, Difilippantonio S, Difilippantonio MJ, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Pilch DR, Sedelnikova OA, et al. H2AX haploinsufficiency modifies genomic stability and tumor susceptibility. Cell. 2003;114:371–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Bassing CH, Suh H, Ferguson DO, Chua KF, Manis J, Eckersdorff M, et al. Histone H2AX: a dosage-dependent suppressor of oncogenic translocations and tumors. Cell. 2003;114:359–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Fernandez-Capetillo O, Mahadevaiah SK, Celeste A, Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD, Bonner WM, et al. H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis. Dev Cell. 2003;4:497–508.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Bonisch C, Schneider K, Punzeler S, Wiedemann SM, Bielmeier C, Bocola M, et al. H2A.Z.2.2 is an alternatively spliced histone H2A.Z variant that causes severe nucleosome destabilization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:5951–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Gamble MJ, Kraus WL. Multiple facets of the unique histone variant macroH2A: from genomics to cell biology. Cell Cycle. 2014;9:2568–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Han W, Li X, Fu X. The macro domain protein family: structure, functions, and their potential therapeutic implications. Mutat Res. 2011;727:86–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Trostle-Weige PK, Meistrich ML, Brock WA, Nishioka K, Bremer JW. Isolation and characterization of TH2A, a germ cell-specific variant of histone 2A in rat testis. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:5560–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Shinagawa T, Huynh LM, Takagi T, Tsukamoto D, Tomaru C, Kwak H-G, et al. Disruption of Th2a and Th2b genes causes defects in spermatogenesis. Development. 2015;142:1287–92

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Shinagawa T, Takagi T, Tsukamoto D, Tomaru C, Huynh LM, Sivaraman P, et al. Histone variants enriched in oocytes enhance reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell. 2014;14:217–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Huynh LM, Shinagawa T, Ishii S. Two histone variants TH2A and TH2B enhance human induced pluripotent stem cell generation. Stem Cells Dev. 2016;25:251–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Churikov D, Siino J, Svetlova M, Zhang K, Gineitis A, Morton Bradbury E, et al. Novel human testis-specific histone H2B encoded by the interrupted gene on the X chromosome. Genomics. 2004;84:745–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Montellier E, Boussouar F, Rousseaux S, Zhang K, Buchou T, Fenaille F, et al. Chromatin-to-nucleoprotamine transition is controlled by the histone H2B variant TH2B. Genes Dev. 2013;27:1680–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Witt O, Albig W, Doenecke D. Testis-specific expression of a novel human H3 histone gene. Exp Cell Res. 1996;229:301–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Schenk R, Jenke A, Zilbauer M, Wirth S, Postberg J. H3.5 is a novel hominid-specific histone H3 variant that is specifically expressed in the seminiferous tubules of human testes. Chromosoma. 2011;120:275–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Earnshaw WC, Cleveland DW. CENP-A and the CENP nomenclature: response to Talbert and Henikoff. Trends Genet. 2013;29:500–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Earnshaw WC, Allshire RC, Black BE, Bloom K, Brinkley BR, Brown W, et al. Esperanto for histones: CENP-A, not CenH3, is the centromeric histone H3 variant. Chromosome Res. 2013;21:101–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Unni E. Stage-specific distribution of the spermatid-specific histone 2B in the rat testis. Biol Reprod. 1995;53:820–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Zalensky AO, Siino JS, Gineitis AA, Zalenskaya IA, Tomilin NV, Yau P, et al. Human testis/sperm-specific histone H2B (hTSH2B). Molecular cloning and characterization. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:43474–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lin Q, Inselman A, Han X, Xu H, Zhang W, Handel MA, et al. Reductions in linker histone levels are tolerated in developing spermatocytes but cause changes in specific gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:23525–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Greaves IK, Rangasamy D, Devoy M, Marshall Graves JA, Tremethick DJ. The X and Y chromosomes assemble into H2A.Z-containing [corrected] facultative heterochromatin [corrected] following meiosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:5394–405.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Huntley MA, Lou M, Goldstein LD, Lawrence M, Dijkgraaf GJP, Kaminker JS, et al. Complex regulation of ADAR-mediated RNA-editing across tissues. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    da Cruz I, Rodríguez-Casuriaga R, Santiñaque FF, Farías J, Curti G, Capoano CA, et al. Transcriptome analysis of highly purified mouse spermatogenic cell populations: gene expression signatures switch from meiotic-to postmeiotic-related processes at pachytene stage. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:294.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Carapito C, Lane L, Benama M, Opsomer A, Mouton-Barbosa E, Garrigues L, et al. Computational and mass-spectrometry-based workflow for the discovery and validation of missing human proteins: application to chromosomes 2 and 14. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:3621–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W242–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Petryszak R, Keays M, Tang YA, Fonseca NA, Barrera E, Burdett T, et al. Expression Atlas update—an integrated database of gene and protein expression in humans, animals and plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D746–52.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Shechter D, Dormann HL, Allis CD, Hake SB. Extraction, purification and analysis of histones. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:1445–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Milbradt J, Kraut A, Hutterer C, Sonntag E, Schmeiser C, Ferro M, et al. Proteomic analysis of the multimeric nuclear egress complex of human cytomegalovirus. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:2132–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Molden RC, Bhanu NV, LeRoy G, Arnaudo AM, Garcia BA. Multi-faceted quantitative proteomics analysis of histone H2B isoforms and their modifications. Epigenet Chromatin. 2015;8:15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Dong Y, Sirotkin AM, Yang YS, Brown DT, Sittman DB, Skoultchi AI. Isolation and characterization of two replication-dependent mouse H1 histone genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:1421–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Yang YS, Brown DT, Wellman SE, Sittman DB. Isolation and characterization of a mouse fully replication-dependent H1 gene within a genomic cluster of core histone genes. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:17118–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Alonso A, Breuer B, Bouterfa H, Doenecke D. Early increase in histone H1(0) mRNA during differentiation of F9 cells to parietal endoderm. EMBO J. 1988;7:3003–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Porcher C, Grandchamp B. Structure of the mouse H2A.X gene and physical linkage to the UPS locus on chromosome 9: assignment of the human H2A.X gene to 11q23 by sequence analysis. Genomics. 1995;25:312–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Pehrson FriedV. MacroH2A, a core histone containing a large nonhistone region. Science. 1992;257:1398–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Costanzi C, Pehrson JR. MACROH2A2, a new member of the MACROH2A core histone family. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:21776–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Chadwick BP, Willard HF. Histone H2A variants and the inactive X chromosome: identification of a second macroH2A variant. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:1101–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Ferguson L, Ellis PJI, Affara NA. Two novel mouse genes mapped to chromosome Yp are expressed specifically in spermatids. Mamm Genome. 2009;20:193–206.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Chen Y, Chen Q, McEachin RC, Cavalcoli JD, Yu X. H2A.B facilitates transcription elongation at methylated CpG loci. Genome Res. 2014;24:570–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Aul RB, Oko RJ. The major subacrosomal occupant of bull spermatozoa is a novel histone H2B variant associated with the forming acrosome during spermiogenesis. Dev Biol. 2001;239:376–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Hraba-Renevey S, Kress M. Expression of a mouse replacement histone H3.3 gene with a highly conserved 3′ noncoding region during SV40- and polyoma-induced Go to S-phase transition. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:2449–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Bramlage B, Kosciessa U, Doenecke D. Differential expression of the murine histone genes H3.3A and H3.3B. Differentiation. 1997;62:13–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Maehara K, Harada A, Sato Y, Matsumoto M, Nakayama KI, Kimura H, et al. Tissue-specific expression of histone H3 variants diversified after species separation. Epigenet Chromatin. 2015;8:688.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Kalitsis P, MacDonald AC, Newson AJ, Hudson DF, Choo KH. Gene structure and sequence analysis of mouse centromere proteins A and C. Genomics. 1998;47:108–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Meier VS, Böhni R, Schumperli D. Nucleotide sequence of two mouse histone H4 genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:795.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Ohe Y, Hayashi H, Iwai K. Human spleen histone H1. Isolation and amino acid sequences of three minor variants, H1a, H1c, and H1d. J Biochem. 1989;106:844–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Eick S, Nicolai M, Mumberg D, Doenecke D. Human H1 histones: conserved and varied sequence elements in two H1 subtype genes. Eur J Cell Biol. 1989;49:110–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Ohe Y, Hayashi H, Iwai K. Human spleen histone H1. Isolation and amino acid sequence of a main variant, H1b. J Biochem. 1986;100:359–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Doenecke D, Tonjes R. Differential distribution of lysine and arginine residues in the closely related histones H1 and H5. Analysis of a human H1 gene. J Mol Biol. 1986;187:461–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Tanaka H, Matsuoka Y, Onishi M, Kitamura K, Miyagawa Y, Nishimura H, et al. Expression profiles and single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis of human HANP1/H1T2 encoding a histone H1-like protein. Int J Androl. 2006;29:353–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Tanaka Y, Kato S, Tanaka M, Kuji N, Yoshimura Y. Structure and expression of the human oocyte-specific histone H1 gene elucidated by direct RT-nested PCR of a single oocyte. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;304:351–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Mizusawa Y, Kuji N, Tanaka Y, Tanaka M, Ikeda E, Komatsu S, et al. Expression of human oocyte-specific linker histone protein and its incorporation into sperm chromatin during fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1134–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Happel N, Schulze E, Doenecke D. Characterisation of human histone H1x. Biol Chem. 2005;386:541–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Mannironi C, Bonner WM, Hatch CL. H2A.X. a histone isoprotein with a conserved C-terminal sequence, is encoded by a novel mRNA with both DNA replication type and polyA 3′ processing signals. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:9113–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Hatch CL, Bonner WM. Sequence of cDNAs for mammalian H2A.Z, an evolutionarily diverged but highly conserved basal histone H2A isoprotein species. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:1113–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Matsuda R, Hori T, Kitamura H, Takeuchi K, Fukagawa T, Harata M. Identification and characterization of the two isoforms of the vertebrate H2A.Z histone variant. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:4263–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Lee Y, Hong M, Kim JW, Hong YM, Choe YK, Chang SY, et al. Isolation of cDNA clones encoding human histone macroH2A1 subtypes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1399:73–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Tolstorukov MY, Goldman JA, Gilbert C, Ogryzko V, Kingston RE, Park PJ. Histone variant H2A.Bbd is associated with active transcription and mRNA processing in human cells. Mol Cell. 2012;47:596–607.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Chadwick BP, Willard HF. A novel chromatin protein, distantly related to histone H2a, is largely excluded from the inactive X chromosome. J Cell Biol. 2001;152:375–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Boulard M, Gautier T, Mbele GO, Gerson V, Hamiche A, Angelov D, et al. The NH2 tail of the novel histone variant H2BFWT exhibits properties distinct from conventional H2B with respect to the assembly of mitotic chromosomes. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:1518–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Ying H-Q, Scott MB, Zhou-cun A. Relationship of SNP of H2BFWT gene to male infertility in a Chinese population with idiopathic spermatogenesis impairment. Biomarkers. 2012;17:402–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Wells D, Hoffman D, Kedes L. Unusual structure, evolutionary conservation of non-coding sequences and numerous pseudogenes characterize the human H3.3 histone multigene family. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:2871–89.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Albig W, Bramlage B, Gruber K, Klobeck H-G, Kunz J, Doenecke D. The human replacement histone H3.3B gene (H3F3B). Genomics. 1995;30:264–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Sullivan KF, Hechenberger M, Masri K. Human CENP-A contains a histone H3 related histone fold domain that is required for targeting to the centromere. J Cell Biol. 1994;127:581–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Syed S, Boulard M, Shukla M, Gautier T, Travers A, Bednar J, et al. The incorporation of the novel histone variant H2AL2 confers unusual structural and functional properties of the nucleosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:4695.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Palmer DK, O’Day K, Margolis RL. The centromere specific histone CENP-A is selectively retained in discrete foci in mammalian sperm nuclei. Chromosoma. 1990;100:32–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    McGregor M, Hariharan N, Joyo A, Margolis RL, Sussman M. CENP-A is essential for cardiac progenitor cell proliferation. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:739–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Medrzycki M, Zhang Y, Cao K, Fan Y. Expression analysis of mammalian linker-histone subtypes. J Vis Exp. 2012;61:e3577B.

    Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Furuya M, Tanaka M, Teranishi T, Matsumoto K, Hosoi Y, Saeki K, et al. H1foo is indispensable for meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte. J Reprod Dev. 2007;53:895–902.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Bao Y, Konesky K, Park Y-J, Rosu S, Dyer PN, Rangasamy D, et al. Nucleosomes containing the histone variant H2A.Bbd organize only 118 base pairs of DNA. EMBO J. 2004;23:3314–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Vizcaíno JA, Csordas A, del-Toro N, Dianes JA, Griss J, Lavidas I, et al. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D447–456

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

SEK, JG and DP designed the project. SEK collected the data relative to histone entries, which was subsequently curated by SEK, AKS, SK, ARP, DL, DP and JG. Mass spectrometry experiments were performed by SEK and AA, and the MS acquired data analysed by SEK, AA, DP and CB. The first version of the manuscript was written by SEK, DP and JG and then critically revised by AKS, ARP, SK and DL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We thank Sophie Rousseaux, Ekaterina Flin and Christophe Battail for their help.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Proteomics data are available from ProteomeXchange under the identifier PXD005489 [131]. RNA-seq data were downloaded from the supplementary information of their original publications [83] or through the Expression Atlas/Array Express repositories [82, 87].


This work was supported by the Fond d’Intervention of the University Grenoble Alpes (to JG), the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-PDOC-0011 to JG), and the European Union FP7 Marie Curie Action “Career Integration Grant” (304003 to JG). This study also received financial support from the French National Research Agency ANR-10-INBS-08 ProFI, Proteomics French Infrastructure. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Delphine Pflieger or Jérôme Govin.

Additional files

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Kennani, S., Adrait, A., Shaytan, A.K. et al. MS_HistoneDB, a manually curated resource for proteomic analysis of human and mouse histones. Epigenetics & Chromatin 10, 2 (2017).

Download citation


  • Histone
  • Histone variants
  • Chromatin
  • Mass spectrometry
  • Proteomics