- Open Access
The pioneer factor activity of c-Myb involves recruitment of p300 and induction of histone acetylation followed by acetylation-induced chromatin dissociation
© The Author(s) 2018
Received: 13 December 2017
Accepted: 26 June 2018
Published: 28 June 2018
The concept of pioneer transcription factors is emerging as an essential part of the epigenetic regulation, taking place during cell development and differentiation. However, the precise molecular mechanism underlying pioneer factor activity remains poorly understood. We recently reported that the transcription factor c-Myb acts as a pioneer factor in haematopoiesis, and a point mutation in its DNA binding domain, D152V, is able to abrogate this function.
Here, we show that specific histone modifications, including H3K27ac, prevent binding of c-Myb to histone tails, representing a novel effect of histone modifications, namely restricting binding of a pioneer factor to chromatin. Furthermore, we have taken advantage of the pioneer-defect D152V mutant to investigate mechanisms of c-Myb’s pioneer factor activity. We show that c-Myb-dependent transcriptional activation of a gene in inaccessible chromatin relies on c-Myb binding to histones, as well as on c-Myb interacting with the histone acetyltransferase p300. ChIP assays show that both wild type and the D152V mutant of c-Myb bind to a selected target gene at its promoter and enhancer, but only wild-type c-Myb causes opening and activation of the locus. Enhancement of histone acetylation restores activation of the same gene in the absence of c-Myb, suggesting that facilitating histone acetylation is a crucial part of the pioneer factor function of c-Myb.
We suggest a pioneer factor model in which c-Myb binds to regions of closed chromatin and then recruits histone acetyltransferases. By binding to histones, c-Myb facilitates histone acetylation, acting as a cofactor for p300 at c-Myb bound sites. The resulting H3K27ac leads to chromatin opening and detachment of c-Myb from the acetylated chromatin. We propose that the latter phenomenon, acetylation-induced chromatin dissociation, represents a mechanism for controlling the dynamics of pioneer factor binding to chromatin.
In eukaryotes, nucleosomes provide steric constraints on how transcription factors can bind DNA. Some transcription factors have the ability to associate with condensed chromatin independently of other factors and modulate chromatin structure. These factors are termed pioneer transcription factors and are the first factors to access a regulatory region. Upon binding to chromatin, pioneer factors increase the accessibility of their target site and thereby allow access to other transcription factors and chromatin modifiers [1, 2]. A large number of identified pioneer factors are emerging, but the precise molecular mechanism underlying pioneer factor function is still an unresolved question in the field. The exception is FoxA1, which has emerged as the prototype pioneer factor. The DNA binding domain of FoxA1 resembles that of linker histones, which makes this pioneer factor structurally suited to bind to nucleosomes, thus facilitating chromatin opening [3, 4]. However, this seems to be a special case for FoxA1 and we have limited understanding of the mechanistic details of other pioneer factors.
Pioneer factors are commonly found bound at enhancers, where chromatin accessibility is highly variable and cell-type specific [1, 5]. Specific histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) are associated with enhancers and their state of activity. For example, active enhancers are acetylated at histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27ac) and mono-methylated at histone 3 lysine 4 (H3K4me1), generated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone methyltransferases (HMTs), respectively . H3K4me1 marks both poised and active enhancers, whereas H3K27ac is found at active enhancers and is acquired almost exclusively in the context of pre-existing H3K4me1 at enhancers . Most pioneer factors interact with chromatin modifiers, and in some studies they have been shown to facilitate H3K27ac at enhancers [8–10]. The consequences of enhancer histone acetylation include binding by proteins containing bromodomains, long-distance enhancer–promoter communication by chromatin looping, as well as formation of a more relaxed chromatin structure resulting from the removal of positive charge from histones [6, 11, 12].
We recently reported that the transcription factor c-Myb functions as a pioneer factor in the regulation of genes essential for haematopoiesis . Furthermore, we identified a pioneer-defect mutant of c-Myb, aspartate 152 to valine (D152V), which has a weakened interaction with H3 while its DNA binding is intact . c-Myb has previously been shown to recruit the HAT CBP to the TAL1 oncogene, resulting in extensive H3K27ac and the generation of an oncogenic super-enhancer . The interaction between c-Myb and p300 has also been shown to be required for the induction of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and seems to be a promising therapeutic target for AML treatment [14, 15]. This suggests that c-Myb acts in concert with p300/CBP to activate enhancers for defining cell identity during normal haematopoiesis, which in turn may aberrantly activate expression of oncogenes during development of leukaemia. Moreover, it suggests that the pioneer factor mechanism of c-Myb might involve the facilitation of H3K27ac at enhancers by p300/CBP. In our study of the D152V mutant of c-Myb, we discovered that the genes that this mutant fails to regulate in a myeloid cell line (K562) are involved in AML signalling, strongly suggesting that the pioneer function of c-Myb is directly connected to its functions in AML. The D152V mutant is an important asset in the study of the pioneer factor functions of c-Myb and may help to identify specific pioneer factor mechanisms, which might also be applicable to other pioneer factors operating in other cell types.
In the present work, we have studied the effect of histone acetylation on c-Myb-dependent activation of a chromatin-embedded gene and how the binding of c-Myb to histones is affected by acetylation. We reveal that histone modifications result in impaired binding of c-Myb to histones. In particular, c-Myb was affected by modifications of the H3 tail (H3R26 citrullination, H3K27 acetylation and H3S28 phosphorylation). At one of the pioneer factor target genes of c-Myb, mim-1, the recruitment of p300 and histone acetylation seems to be essential for activation. Based on these observations, we propose a specific mechanism of action of c-Myb pioneer factor function, where c-Myb recruits p300/CBP to closed regions of chromatin and facilitates histone acetylation. This suggests that for c-Myb to fully function as a pioneer factor, the interaction with both H3 and p300/CBP needs to be intact. Furthermore, we propose that histone acetylation at specific sites cause dissociation of c-Myb from chromatin upon activation of target genes. The latter is a novel consequence of histone acetylation in regulation of pioneer factor binding to chromatin.
Binding of c-Myb to native histones from K562 cells is strongly impaired by histone acetylation
The c-Myb mutant D152V contains an amino acid substitution of valine for aspartate within its DNA binding domain (DBD). This mutation results in a weakened interaction with H3, but the binding to DNA is not affected . The mutated aspartate residue is located to an acidic patch in the c-Myb DBD and results in reduced negative charge. c-Myb contains three of these acidic patches, one in each of the repeats constituting the DBD, named R1, R2 and R3, and these have previously been suggested to bind to histone tails . Considering the basic nature of histone tails, it was expected that the loss of negative charge caused by D152V in the c-Myb DBD would result in a weakened histone binding. We therefore asked the question whether the opposite might also be the case; namely a weakened c-Myb–histone interaction due to loss of positive charge in histones. Acetylation neutralizes the positive charge of the lysine residues on histones, and therefore, we tested the effect of chromatin acetylation on c-Myb binding to histones.
Specific histone modifications prevent c-Myb binding to histone tails
The three specific modifications that prevented c-Myb from binding to the H3 tail are all associated with chromatin decompaction and activation of transcription [16–18]. Moreover, these modifications result in less positive charge of histones tails, either by the neutralization of a positive charge, which is the case for H3R26cit and H3K27ac, or by introduction of a negative charge, as in the case of H3S28P. This may explain the loss of c-Myb binding, since the interaction between c-Myb and histones is likely to be mediated through electrostatic interactions between the acidic patches of the c-Myb DBD and the positively charged histone tails. Of note, methylation of H3R26 and H3K27 did not affect c-Myb binding, possibly because histone methylation does not alter the charge of the histone tail.
We also incubated a histone peptide array with the DBD of c-Myb D152V fused to GST and observed the same binding pattern as for wild-type c-Myb (Fig. 2b, lower panel). This mutation is located to the R3 repeat of the DBD and results in a loss of H3 binding in the R3 (Fig. 2a). The R2 repeat also contains a histone binding site, which is able to bind to H3 even though R3 is mutated, resulting in a weakened binding of the full DBD to H3, but not complete loss . To test whether R3 alone has the same histone binding pattern as the full DBD, we incubated histone peptide arrays with wild-type and mutant R3 fused to GST. We observed the same binding pattern for wild-type R3 as the full DBD, but R3 D152V did not bind to any of the peptides on the array (Additional file 1: Figure S1). This suggest that the histone binding sites in the c-Myb DBD binds to peptides from all four canonical histones and that binding to all four histones is weakened by the D152V mutation.
Taken together, the binding of c-Myb to histone tails seems to be quite unspecific, as c-Myb binds to the tails of all four canonical histones, regardless of modifications. However, the modifications that prevent c-Myb from binding histone tails are very specific. In particular, modifications of the residues 26–28 of H3 causing less positive charge of the H3 tail result in a loss of c-Myb binding. Many acetylations elsewhere in H3 that is also reducing the charge of the histone tail had no effect on c-Myb binding. This may reflect a preferred positioning of c-Myb binding to this region of the histone tail.
Histone acetylation can restore activation of a chromatin-embedded gene
Due to the specific effect of H3K27ac on c-Myb histone binding, we asked how histone acetylation affects c-Myb-dependent transcriptional activation and in particular, how the transcriptional activation of a pioneer target gene of c-Myb is affected. The chicken mim-1 gene is one of the most thoroughly studied c-Myb target genes and a well-established model system to study the initial events of chromatin opening and how c-Myb activates its target genes . mim-1 is expressed in myelomonocytic cells, and the expression only occurs in the presence of c-Myb and is associated with chromatin opening at the mim-1 enhancer and promoter [20, 21]. We recently reported that the c-Myb D152V mutant is unable to activate transcription of endogenous mim-1 in the chicken macrophage cell line HD-11, while it was fully able to activate the same promoter on a transfected plasmid, suggesting that the D152V mutation specifically interferes with the ability of c-Myb to activate transcription in a chromatin context .
Histone binding and p300 recruitment is required for c-Myb to fully activate transcription of a chromatin-embedded gene
c-Myb has been found to recruit p300/CBP to target genes and facilitate histone acetylation [10, 23]. Since it is the histone binding that is weakened in the D152V mutant, we next asked whether a mutant in the p300 interaction region of c-Myb would be able to activate transcription of mim-1. The c-Myb mutant M303V was identified by mice mutagenesis screening and the mice carrying this mutation had elevated levels of megakaryocytes and platelet production, as well as blocks in T cell, B cell and red blood cell development . Of note, this phenotype is strikingly similar to the phenotype of mice harbouring the D152V mutation of c-Myb . The M303V mutation is located to the transactivation domain of c-Myb, which mediates the interaction with p300 , and was reported to have weakened interaction with p300 resulting in inefficient recruitment of p300 to target genes .
ChIP analysis of the mim-1 locus in HD-11 cells
We next asked whether we by ChIP could observe changes in H3K27ac levels at the mim-1 enhancer and promoter. We found that the D152V mutant caused only minor alterations in the acetylation levels compared to empty vector control, suggesting that it does not enable p300-mediated acetylation (Fig. 5e–g). The mutant appears to bind chromatin, but without inducing any major change in acetylation. In contrast, wild-type c-Myb induced a drop in the level of H3K27ac at both the enhancer and the promoter. At first, we thought this might be inconsistent with our model, until we realized that H3K27ac ChIP monitors the level of both H3 and its modification H3K27ac. If c-Myb in fact acts as a pioneer factor and through its binding displaces nucleosomes and creates a nucleosome-free region, this drop is exactly what we should expect. Moreover, from published ChIP-seq data we know that c-Myb, like many other TFs, is found in “valleys” of the acetylation profile (exemplified in , specifically its Fig. 5c). This is also the basis for DNaseI hypersensitive sites . In our ChIP analysis we sonicated the chromatin down to a range of 100-300 bp (Fig. 5d), thus revealing only the closest neighbourhood of the bound factor. The acetylation drop observed with wild-type c-Myb, not with the D152V mutant, is therefore consistent with the pioneer model. Unfortunately, it does not directly address the role of acetylation in the transition from closed to open chromatin. To capture this transition, if at all possible, would have required a highly dynamic ChIP analysis using an inducible system with extremely fine time resolution.
We next asked how TSA treatment affected the acetylation levels at the mim-1 locus. As shown in Fig. 5e–g, we observed the expected increase in H3K27ac levels at both the promoter and the enhancer after TSA treatment, independent of c-Myb. Again, the D152V mutant caused little change in this enhancement, while the wild-type c-Myb caused a reduced H3K27ac level, consistent with less nucleosomes at the c-Myb bound sites. Taking into consideration that the ChIP assay was performed using transfected cells, the remaining TSA-induced increase in a region occupied by wild-type c-Myb is probably related to the fact that TSA affects all cells, while c-Myb is present only in the transfected fraction of cells.
Identifying a pioneer-defect mutant of c-Myb, D152V, provided us with a useful tool to study its pioneer factor function. This is the first pioneer-specific mutant of any transcription factor identified so far, where this particular function is impaired while keeping its DNA binding intact, and might help to dissect pioneer mechanisms in a way that will be relevant to pioneer factors in general. Interestingly, we found that the binding pattern of the D152V mutant to histone tails was identical to that of wild-type c-Myb, binding to all four canonical histones and only disrupted by specific modifications (Fig. 2). This suggests that the R2 repeat of the DBD of c-Myb is able to bind to histone tails in the same manner as the full DBD, as D152V is located to the R3 repeat and disrupts histone binding of this repeat only. The binding pattern of R3 alone was also identical to that of the full DBD, further suggesting that R2 and R3 bind to histone tails equally (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Even though the histone binding is lost in the R3 by D152V, R2 seems to be fully capable of binding to histones independently of R3. Due to the severely impaired ability of c-Myb D152V to open chromatin, the R3 repeat seems to be important for the chromatin opening step rather than the binding to closed chromatin .
Three H3 PTMs specifically disrupted the binding of c-Myb to the H3 tail, namely H3R26cit, H3K27ac and H3S28P (Fig. 2). Interestingly, other modifications of the same residues had no apparent effect on c-Myb binding. H3K27ac is the most studied of these three PTMs, and it is well known that c-Myb recruits the H3K27 acetyltransferase p300/CBP to target genes. So far, most studies are mainly focused on how acetylated histones act as binding platforms for bromodomain proteins or other acetylation readers, but to our knowledge no studies have observed the opposite; that histone acetylation may disturb the binding of other proteins. However, there is evidence that the combination of H3S10P and H3K14ac cause dissociation of HP1 proteins from H3 allowing the cell to overcome HP1-mediated transcriptional repression . Since H3K27ac has such a specific effect on c-Myb binding, we hypothesize that c-Myb might detach from chromatin after having recruited H3K27 acetyltransferase activity to its target sites and that it is the histone modification that causes the chromatin to open rather than the pioneer factor itself. Likewise, the less studied modifications H3R26cit and H3S28P are also associated with open chromatin [17, 32]. To date, c-Myb is not known to recruit histone deiminases or histone kinases to its target genes.
Although c-Myb seems to bind several regions of H3, modifications in residue 26–28 have a very specific effect on its binding. Residue 27–42 of H3 has previously been suggested to be the binding site of c-Myb , and our findings may reflect a stronger binding to this region in the absence of the respective modifications. The histones are predominantly globular, except for their unstructured N-terminal tails. One possible reason for c-Myb to bind stronger to this region of H3 and be more sensitive to modifications here could be that it is closer to the globular domain of H3 and consequently closer to the region that is bound by DNA in a nucleosome. Since it is the DBD of c-Myb that binds both DNA and histones, nucleosome binding by c-Myb may require that the binding sites on histones and DNA are in close proximity. Histone modifications that decrease the positive charge of the histone tail will consequently cause a weaker interaction between the histone tail and DNA, as well as between the histone tail and the acidic patches in the c-Myb DBD that interacts with histones. One may imagine that c-Myb is not able to bind its DNA recognition motif on the nucleosome core without also binding the basic histone tails and that c-Myb will dissociate from chromatin when H3 is acetylated, phosphorylated and/or citrullinated at residue 26–28. This dissociation of factors from chromatin may be a process in which the cell controls the dynamics of transcriptional events, making sure that factors are evicted and possibly degraded after having exerted their function on chromatin.
The importance of the histone binding site in R3 to be intact for c-Myb to open chromatin might suggest that R3 is involved in facilitating specific histone modifications . The DBD of c-Myb has previously been suggested to position H3 for acetylation by p300, leading to increased histone acetylation and gene activation . It is therefore conceivable that R3 positions the H3 tail for its subsequent modification by histone modifying enzymes and that this function is impaired by the D152V mutation. TSA treatment, which enhances histone acetylation, was able to override the repression of mim-1 in HD-11 cells transfected with D152V and even in cells without c-Myb expression, whereas the treatment had no effect on mim-1 expression in cells transfected with wild-type c-Myb. Based on western blot signals, the TSA treatment enhanced global H3K27ac levels equally in all the cells (Fig. 3). The ChIP analysis also confirmed that the TSA treatment caused enhanced H3K27 acetylation at the c-Myb responsive regions at the mim-1 locus (Fig. 5e–g). Enhancement of histone acetylation restored mim-1 expression even in the absence of c-Myb. Considering the dependence of mim-1 expression on c-Myb’s pioneer factor activity, the underlying mechanism of this pioneer function is likely to involve introduction or increase of histone acetylation in particular, and possibly other activating histone modifications as well.
Despite the obvious role of acetylation in our observations and model, there are some details pointing to a greater complexity. The ability of TSA to increase mim-1 expression in the absence of c-Myb (Fig. 3) combined with its ability to increase the H3K27ac levels at the mim-1 locus (Fig. 5e–g) suggests a slightly different activation mechanism in the two cases. While c-Myb-induced activation seems to imply loss of nucleosomes and bound c-Myb, TSA-induced activation appears to occur without full displacement of nucleosomes (reflected in enhanced H3K27ac levels) but with generation of acetylated nucleosomes, suggesting that some nucleosomal features, such as acetylation-induced changes in accessibility or nucleosomal architecture [33–35], are sufficient for mim-1 activation.
The interaction between c-Myb and p300/CBP is required for normal haematopoiesis, but also crucial for the aberrant gene activation that occurs during leukaemic transformation due to c-Myb overexpression [24, 36]. It was therefore interesting to find that a c-Myb mutant, M303V, supposed to have a weakened p300 interaction , has the same defect in activating transcription of the mim-1 gene as a mutant with a weakened histone interaction, namely D152V (Fig. 4). Mice harbouring either of these two mutations have been found to have very similar phenotypes, including several haematopoietic defects, suggesting that they do affect a similar mechanism [24, 25]. This suggests that in order for c-Myb to activate transcription of mim-1, interaction with both histones and involvement of p300 is essential, possibly because histone acetylation is needed for the activation and c-Myb might position H3 for acetylation by p300. Transcriptional activation of the mim-1 gene has been found to involve chromatin opening by c-Myb [20, 21], as also our ChIP analysis indicates (Fig. 5), but it might in fact be the histone acetylation that is responsible for the increased chromatin accessibility due to reduced nucleosomal stability, either by itself or by somehow in cooperation with the pioneer factor . By positioning histone tails for acetylation, c-Myb could be regarded as a cofactor for p300, allowing the latter to more efficiently acetylate sites in closed chromatin. The pioneer function of c-Myb would then be closely related to this p300 cofactor function. Of note, almost all pioneer factors identified so far interacts with p300/CBP [8, 37–44]. A few studies have also shown that pioneer factors that recruit p300/CBP to enhancers also facilitate H3K27ac at the enhancer, which might indicate that this is a general mechanism of action of pioneer factors [8–10]. Overexpression of p300 was able to partially override the defect of the two c-Myb mutants in HD-11 cells, in the same way as enhancement of histone acetylation was able to restore activation of mim-1 in the absence of c-Myb (Figs. 3 and 4), suggesting that mim-1 expression might not completely depend on c-Myb transcriptional activity.
Most pioneer factors identified so far interact with chromatin modifiers, including p300/CBP. Whether pioneer factors are able to increase chromatin accessibility fully independent of other factors is still being debated [2, 45]. Based on the data presented here, we propose a mechanism of c-Myb pioneer factor function in which both recruitment of histone acetyltransferase activity and induction of histone acetylation is essential for the opening of chromatin and activation of gene expression. Since recruitment of p300 is a common feature of many transcription factors, we propose that the pioneer function of c-Myb is specifically dependent on its ability to bind histones, thereby acting as a cofactor for p300 needed to efficiently acetylate H3K27 at c-Myb bound sites in inaccessible chromatin. As the H3K27ac mark is commonly associated with active enhancers, this may represent a mechanism by which c-Myb promotes enhancer activation. We suggest that this mechanism may be applicable to other pioneer factors as well. In addition, we have revealed a previously unknown outcome of histone acetylation, namely restricting pioneer factor binding to chromatin.
Three cell lines were used in this work: K562 (ATCC® CCL-243™Homo sapiens bone marrow, chronic myelogenous leukaemia), COS-1 (ATCC® CRL-1650™ Cercopithecus aethiops kidney) and HD-11 (Gallus gallus macrophage). The HD-11 cell line has been described  and was kindly provided by A. Leutz (Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin). The cells were cultured as described in . K562 cells were treated with 50 ng/ml TSA for 4 h at 37 °C before harvesting. HD-11 cells and COS-1 cells were seeded and transfected with plasmids using TransIT-LT transfection reagent (Mirus Bio) as described in . HD-11 cells were treated with 15 ng/ml TSA for 16 h at 37 °C (8 h after transfection) before harvesting. RNA was isolated from HD-11 cells 24 h after transfection. RNA isolation, reverse transcription and qRT-PCR were performed as described in . Protein extraction from HD-11 cells and western blotting was performed as described in . COS-1 cells were lysed 24 h after transfection and used in co-immunoprecipitation assays.
Purification of recombinant and native histones from K562 cells
Recombinant histones were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS, purified and reconstituted into octamers as described previously . The protocol for purification of native histones is based on  and . K562 cells were treated with 50 ng/ml TSA or DMSO for 4 h at 37 °C before harvesting and wash in ice-cold 1x PBS. Cells were resuspended in ice-cold NBA/B buffer (85 mM NaCl, 5.5% sucrose, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.05% NP40, 0.2 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT, 1x Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)) and incubated for 3 min on ice. 5 mM sodium butyrate was added to all subsequent buffers for TSA-treated cells. Cells were centrifuged at 2500 rpm and resuspended again in NBA/B buffer, and the procedure above repeated. Nuclei were washed in ice-cold NBR buffer (85 mM NaCl, 5.5% sucrose, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 3 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM CaCl2 0.1% NP40, 0.2 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT, 1x Complete protease inhibitor cocktail) and resuspended in 10 mL NBR buffer and subjected to MNase digestion with 214 Boehringer units for 108 cells for 10 min at 37 °C with occasional swirling to obtain mononucleosomes. Reactions were stopped by adding EDTA to a final concentration of 30 mM and centrifuged for 10 min at 8000 rpm at 4 °C and resuspended in TE buffer containing 0.2 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT and 1x Complete protease inhibitor cocktail. The reaction was centrifuged again at 12 000 rpm at 4 °C and salt concentration adjusted to 0.63 M NaCl and 100 mM K-PO4 pH 7.2. Octamers were loaded onto a prepacked hydroxyapatite column in 0.63 M NaCl and 100 mM K-PO4 pH 7.2 and eluted in high-salt buffer (2 M NaCl, 100 mM K-PO4 pH 7.2). Pooled fractions of octamers were concentrated on an Amicon ultra-15 centrifugal filter unit (cut-off 3 kDa, Merckmillipore) and stored in 50% glycerol at − 20 °C.
GST and GST fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli as previously described . GST and GST fusion proteins prebound to Glutathione Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) were incubated for 1 h rotating at 4 °C with 6 µg purified histone octamers from K562 cells in interaction buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 10% glycerol, 0.2% Triton-X-100, 150 mM KAc, 1 mM DTT, 1x Complete protease inhibitor cocktail). Beads were washed 4 times in interaction buffer with 10 min rotation at 4 °C for each wash and resuspended in SDS loading buffer after the last washing step. Protein was detected by western blotting as described in .
Peptide binding assays
MODified™ histone peptide arrays (13,005, Active Motif) were blocked in TBST buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 0.05% Tween 20, 150 mM NaCl) containing 5% non-fat dried milk at 4 °C overnight. The membranes were incubated with 10 nM GST-tagged c-Myb or GST protein alone at 4 °C overnight in interaction buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 10% glycerol, 0.2% Triton-X-100, 150 mM KAc, 1 mM DTT, 1x Complete protease inhibitor cocktail). After washing in TBST, the membranes were incubated with mouse anti-GST (GenScript) in TBST (1:2000 dilution) containing 5% non-fat dried milk at 4 °C overnight. After washing in TBST, the membranes were incubated with anti-mouse IRDye 800CW (LiCor) in TBST (1:10 000 dilution) containing 5% non-fat dried milk for 1 h at room temperature and after washing in TBST, the membranes were imaged using the Odyssey imaging system. The arrays were analysed using the manufacturer’s software (Active Motif). A full overview of the peptide spot positions can be found here: https://www.activemotif.com/catalog/668/modified-histone-peptide-array.
COS-1 cells were lysed 24 h after transfection in lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 10% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 150 mM KAc, 0.05% NP-40, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 5 × Complete protease inhibitor cocktail). Lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with indicated antibodies and Protein A Dynabeads (Invitrogen) for 2 h rotating at 4 °C. The beads were washed 2 times in lysis buffer and resuspended in SDS loading buffer after the last washing step. Protein was detected by western blotting as described in .
The HD-11 cell line was transfected with plasmids encoding TY-tagged c-Myb variants (empty vector, 3xTY1-c-Myb, 3xTY-c-Myb D152V) described in . The ChIP analysis was performed essentially as previously described [53, 54], using anti-Ty1 antibodies for IP of c-Myb and anti-H3K27ac antibody (# 39,133, Active Motif) for IP of H3K27ac. The anti-Ty1 monoclonal mouse antibody was produced in our lab from a hybridoma cell line . Occupancy was determined with qRT-PCR using primers for specific regions of the mim-1 locus (LECT2). Primer sequences are available upon request.
Chromatin extraction assay
Nuclei were isolated from K562 cells stably expressing TY-tagged c-Myb or c-Myb D152V. Salt extractions were performed essentially as described in . Sedimented material (nuclear pellet P) and methanol/chloroform-precipitated supernatant (S) proteins were dissolved in SDS sample buffer and analysed as for Western blots.
The mammalian expression vectors pCIneo-hcM-HA, pCIneo-hcM (D152V)-HA, pCIneo-hcM (M303V)-HA, pCIneo-hcM (D152V-M303V), pCMV-p300-Myc as well as “empty vector” pCIneo-HA were used for expression of c-Myb and p300 in HD-11 cells and COS-1 cells. pCIneo-hcM-HA, pCIneo-hcM (D152V)-HA and pCMV-p300-Myc have been previously described in [13, 53, 57]. The M303V mutation was generated using PCR-based mutagenesis on a subfragment of human c-Myb, and the D152V-M303V double mutation was generated by combining restriction fragments (using EcoRI + NotI) from the single mutation plasmids.
The expression vectors for the GST fusion proteins GST-hcM-NR123, GST-hcM-NR123 (D152V), GST-hcM-R3 and GST-hcM-R3 (D152V) have been described in .
ML constructed plasmids and performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments, and RE purified recombinant and native histones from K562 cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments were performed by ML and MR. MR also performed the chromatin extraction experiment. All other experiments were performed by BMF. BMF and OSG designed the experiments. RE participated in supervision, active discussions and finalizing the manuscript. BMF and OSG wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We are grateful to Monika Gelazauskaite for generating the pCIneo-hcM (M303V)-HA construct. We thank Gunnar Schotta for human H3.1 expression plasmid and Robert Schneider for human plasmids for expression of H2A, H2B and H4.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of supporting data
Consent for publication
All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This work was supported by the University of Oslo. Funding was provided by University of Oslo PhD Grant (to B.M.F.), Norwegian Cancer Society [3485238-2013 to R.E.], Research Council of Norway [240768 to O.S.G., 262652 to R.E.].
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Zaret KS, Carroll JS. Pioneer transcription factors: establishing competence for gene expression. Genes Dev. 2011;25:2227–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Iwafuchi-Doi M, Zaret KS. Pioneer transcription factors in cell reprogramming. Genes Dev. 2014;28:2679–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Clark KL, Halay ED, Lai E, Burley SK. Co-crystal structure of the HNF-3/fork head DNA-recognition motif resembles histone H5. Nature. 1993;364:412–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cirillo LA, McPherson CE, Bossard P, Stevens K, Cherian S, Shim EY, et al. Binding of the winged-helix transcription factor HNF3 to a linker histone site on the nucleosome. EMBO J. 1998;17:244–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bulger M, Groudine M. Functional and mechanistic diversity of distal transcription enhancers. Cell. 2011;144:327–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Calo E, Wysocka J. Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol Cell. 2013;49:825–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonn S, Zinzen RP, Girardot C, Gustafson EH, Perez-Gonzalez A, Delhomme N, et al. Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures of enhancer activity during embryonic development. Nat Genet. 2012;44:148–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi SH, Gearhart MD, Cui Z, Bosnakovski D, Kim M, Schennum N, et al. DUX4 recruits p300/CBP through its C-terminus and induces global H3K27 acetylation changes. Nucl Acids Res. 2016;44:5161–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kerschner JL, Gosalia N, Leir S-H, Harris A. Chromatin remodeling mediated by the FOXA1/A2 transcription factors activates CFTR expression in intestinal epithelial cells. Epigenetics. 2014;9:557–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mansour MR, Abraham BJ, Anders L, Berezovskaya A, Gutierrez A, Durbin AD, et al. An oncogenic super-enhancer formed through somatic mutation of a noncoding intergenic element. Science. 2014;346:1373–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Filippakopoulos P, Knapp S. The bromodomain interaction module. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:2692–704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim YW, Kim A. Histone acetylation contributes to chromatin looping between the locus control region and globin gene by influencing hypersensitive site formation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1829:963–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuglerud BM, Lemma RB, Wanichawan P, Sundaram AYM, Eskeland R, Gabrielsen OS. A c-Myb mutant causes deregulated differentiation due to impaired histone binding and abrogated pioneer factor function. Nucl Acids Res. 2017;45:7681–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zuber J, Rappaport AR, Luo W, Wang E, Chen C, Vaseva AV, et al. An integrated approach to dissecting oncogene addiction implicates a Myb-coordinated self-renewal program as essential for leukemia maintenance. Genes Dev. 2011;25:1628–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Uttarkar S, Dassé E, Coulibaly A, Steinmann S, Jakobs A, Schomburg C, et al. Targeting acute myeloid leukemia with a small molecule inhibitor of the Myb/p300 interaction. Blood. 2016;127:1173–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21:381–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Guertin MJ, Zhang X, Anguish L, Kim S, Varticovski L, Lis JT, et al. Targeted H3R26 deimination specifically facilitates estrogen receptor binding by modifying nucleosome structure. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004613.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sun J-M, Chen HY, Espino PS, Davie JR. Phosphorylated serine 28 of histone H3 is associated with destabilized nucleosomes in transcribed chromatin. Nucl Acids Res. 2007;35:6640–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ness SA, Marknell Å, Graf T. The v-myb oncogene product binds to and activates the promyelocyte-specific mim-1 gene. Cell. 1989;59:1115–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilczek C, Chayka O, Plachetka A, Klempnauer K-H. Myb-induced chromatin remodeling at a dual enhancer/promoter element involves non-coding rna transcription and is disrupted by oncogenic mutations of v-myb. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:35314–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Plachetka A, Chayka O, Wilczek C, Melnik S, Bonifer C, Klempnauer K-H. C/EBPbeta induces chromatin opening at a cell-type-specific enhancer. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:2102–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Thomas D, Tyers M. Transcriptional regulation: Kamikaze activators. Curr Biol. 2000;10:R341–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mo X, Kowenz-Leutz E, Laumonnier Y, Xu H, Leutz A. Histone H3 tail positioning and acetylation by the c-Myb but not the v-Myb DNA-binding SANT domain. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2447–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sandberg ML, Sutton SE, Pletcher MT, Wiltshire T, Tarantino LM, Hogenesch JB, et al. c-Myb and p300 regulate hematopoietic stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Dev Cell. 2005;8:153–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carpinelli MR, Hilton DJ, Metcalf D, Antonchuk JL, Hyland CD, Mifsud SL, et al. Suppressor screen in Mpl-/- mice: c-Myb mutation causes supraphysiological production of platelets in the absence of thrombopoietin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:6553–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Parker D, Rivera M, Zor T, Henrion-Caude A, Radhakrishnan I, Kumar A, et al. Role of secondary structure in discrimination between constitutive and inducible activators. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:5601–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ording E, Bergholtz S, Brendeford EM, Jamin N, Gabrielsen OS. Flexibility in the second half-site sequence recognised by the c-Myb R2 domain—in vitro and in vivo analysis. Oncogene. 1996;13:1043–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chayka O, Kintscher J, Braas D, Klempnauer K-H. v-Myb mediates cooperation of a cell-specific enhancer with the mim-1 promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:499–511.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Xu Y, Milazzo JP, Somerville TDD, Tarumoto Y, Huang Y-H, Ostrander EL, et al. A TFIID-SAGA perturbation that targets MYB and suppresses acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:13–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thurman RE, Rynes E, Humbert R, Vierstra J, Maurano MT, Haugen E, et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:75–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mateescu B, England P, Halgand F, Yaniv M, Muchardt C. Tethering of HP1 proteins to chromatin is relieved by phosphoacetylation of histone H3. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:490–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rossetto D, Avvakumov N, Côté J. Histone phosphorylation: a chromatin modification involved in diverse nuclear events. Epigenetics. 2012;7:1098–108.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tessarz P, Kouzarides T. Histone core modifications regulating nucleosome structure and dynamics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:703–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mueller B, Mieczkowski J, Kundu S, Wang P, Sadreyev R, Tolstorukov MY, et al. Widespread changes in nucleosome accessibility without changes in nucleosome occupancy during a rapid transcriptional induction. Genes Dev. 2017;31:451–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Henikoff S. Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:15–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pattabiraman DR, McGirr C, Shakhbazov K, Barbier V, Krishnan K, Mukhopadhyay P, et al. Interaction of c-Myb with p300 is required for the induction of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by human AML oncogenes. Blood. 2014;123:2682–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grossman SR. p300/CBP/p53 interaction and regulation of the p53 response. Eur J Biochem. 2001;268:2773–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Zhou L-Q, Yu W, Zhao Z-G, Xie X-M, Wang W-T, et al. PML4 facilitates erythroid differentiation by enhancing the transcriptional activity of GATA-1. Blood. 2014;123:261–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans PM, Zhang W, Chen X, Yang J, Bhakat KK, Liu C. Kruppel-like factor 4 is acetylated by p300 and regulates gene transcription via modulation of histone acetylation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:33994–4002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dai YS, Markham BE. p300 Functions as a coactivator of transcription factor GATA-4. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:37178–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto H, Kihara-Negishi F, Yamada T, Hashimoto Y, Oikawa T. Physical and functional interactions between the transcription factor PU.1 and the coactivator CBP. Oncogene. 1999;18:1495–501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Curtis AM, Seo S-B, Westgate EJ, Rudic RD, Smyth EM, Chakravarti D, et al. Histone acetyltransferase-dependent chromatin remodeling and the vascular clock. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:7091–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsuda M, Takahashi S, Takahashi Y, Asahara H. Transcriptional co-activators CREB-binding protein and p300 regulate chondrocyte-specific gene expression via association with Sox9. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:27224–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomita A, Towatari M, Tsuzuki S, Hayakawa F, Kosugi H, Tamai K, et al. c-Myb acetylation at the carboxyl-terminal conserved domain by transcriptional co-activator p300. Oncogene. 2000;19:444–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swinstead EE, Paakinaho V, Presman DM, Hager GL. Pioneer factors and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors interact dynamically: a new perspective: Multiple transcription factors can effect chromatin pioneer functions through dynamic interactions with ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors. Bioessays. 2016;38:1150–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beug H, von Kirchbach A, Döderlein G, Conscience JF, Graf T. Chicken hematopoietic cells transformed by seven strains of defective avian leukemia viruses display three distinct phenotypes of differentiation. Cell. 1979;18:375–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Molværsmyr A-K, Saether T, Gilfillan S, Lorenzo PI, Kvaløy H, Matre V, et al. A SUMO-regulated activation function controls synergy of c-Myb through a repressor-activator switch leading to differential p300 recruitment. Nucl Acids Res. 2010;38:4970–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Saether T, Berge T, Ledsaak M, Matre V, Alm-Kristiansen AH, Dahle Ø, et al. The chromatin remodeling factor Mi-2alpha acts as a novel co-activator for human c-Myb. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:13994–4005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luger K, Rechsteiner TJ, Richmond TJ. Preparation of nucleosome core particle from recombinant histones. Methods Enzymol. 1999;304:3–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simon RH, Felsenfeld G. A new procedure for purifying histone pairs H2A + H2B and H3 + H4 from chromatin using hydroxylapatite. Nucl Acids Res. 1979;6:689–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kornberg RD, LaPointe JW, Lorch Y. Preparation of nucleosomes and chromatin. Methods Enzymol. 1989;170:3–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dahle Ø, Bakke O, Gabrielsen OS. c-Myb associates with PML in nuclear bodies in hematopoietic cells. Exp Cell Res. 2004;297:118–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ledsaak M, Bengtsen M, Molværsmyr A-K, Fuglerud BM, Matre V, Eskeland R, et al. PIAS1 binds p300 and behaves as a coactivator or corepressor of the transcription factor c-Myb dependent on SUMO-status. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1859:705–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bengtsen M, Sørensen L, Aabel L, Ledsaak M, Matre V, Gabrielsen OS. The adaptor protein ARA55 and the nuclear kinase HIPK1 assist c-Myb in recruiting p300 to chromatin. BBA Gene Regul Mech. 2017;1860:751–60.Google Scholar
- Bastin P, Bagherzadeh Z, Matthews KR, Gull K. A novel epitope tag system to study protein targeting and organelle biogenesis in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996;77:235–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Landsverk HB, Kirkhus M, Bollen M, Küntziger T, Collas P. PNUTS enhances in vitro chromosome decondensation in a PP1-dependent manner. Biochem J. 2005;390:709–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dahle Ø, Andersen TØ, Nordgård O, Matre V, del Sal G, Gabrielsen OS. Transactivation properties of c-Myb are critically dependent on two SUMO-1 acceptor sites that are conjugated in a PIASy enhanced manner. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270:1338–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar