Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe requires heat-shock molecular chaperones Hsp90 and Mas5

Epigenetics & Chromatin201811:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-018-0199-8

Received: 27 January 2018

Accepted: 31 May 2018

Published: 4 June 2018

Abstract

Background

Heat-shock molecular chaperone proteins (Hsps) promote the loading of small interfering RNA (siRNA) onto RNA interference (RNAi) effector complexes. While the RNAi process is coupled with heterochromatin assembly in several model organisms, it remains unclear whether the Hsps contribute to epigenetic gene regulation. In this study, we used the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe as a model organism and investigated the roles of Hsp90 and Mas5 (a nucleocytoplasmic type-I Hsp40 protein) in RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly.

Results

Using a genetic screen and biochemical analyses, we identified Hsp90 and Mas5 as novel silencing factors. Mutations in the genes encoding these factors caused derepression of silencing at the pericentromere, where heterochromatin is assembled in an RNAi-dependent manner, but not at the subtelomere, where RNAi is dispensable. The mutations also caused a substantial reduction in the level of dimethylation of histone H3 at Lys9 at the pericentromere, where association of the Argonaute protein Ago1 was also abrogated. Consistently, siRNA corresponding to the pericentromeric repeats was undetectable in these mutant cells. In addition, levels of Tas3, which is a protein in the RNA-induced transcriptional silencing complex along with Ago1, were reduced in the absence of Mas5.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the Hsps Hsp90 and Mas5 contribute to RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly. In particular, Mas5 appears to be required to stabilize Tas3 in vivo. We infer that impairment of Hsp90 and Hsp40 also may affect the integrity of the epigenome in other organisms.

Keywords

RNAiHeterochromatinFission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Heat-shock molecular chaperonsHsp90Mas5

Background

Assembly of heterochromatin, a dense chromatin structure that represses the expression of embedded genes, is vital for the establishment and maintenance of cell identity. A hallmark of heterochromatin is methylation of histone H3 at Lys-9 (H3K9me), a modification that is conserved from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe to humans. Studies using S. pombe as a model organism have established the concept that the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway contributes to the assembly of heterochromatin (reviewed in [14]). In fission yeast, the RNAi pathway is required predominantly at the pericentromeric regions, while the pathway is dispensable for the maintenance of the heterochromatin assembled at the subtelomeric regions and the mating-type locus [57]. Notably, defects in the RNAi pathway lead to great loss of H3K9me and derepression of silencing at the pericentromeric regions but not at the subtelomeric regions or the mating-type locus [58]. These regional differences in dependence on the RNAi pathway have provided researchers with clues to ascertain whether the factors of interest act specifically in the RNAi pathway or act more generally in the assembly of heterochromatin [911].

In the S. pombe RNAi pathway, formation of the small interfering RNA (siRNA)-containing effector complex is coupled to heterochromatin assembly [14]. siRNA is generated, by the Dicer family endoribonuclease Dcr1, from double-stranded non-coding RNA that is complementary to heterochromatin. The siRNA duplex is loaded onto a non-chromatin-associated complex called Argonaute small interfering RNA chaperone (ARC), which contains the Argonaute family endoribonuclease Ago1. The loading of the siRNA duplex onto the Ago1 subunit requires the two ARC-specific subunits Arb1 and Arb2, which also inhibit the release of the passenger strand [12]. This complex then changes its subunit composition to form a chromatin-associated effector complex called RNA-induced transcriptional silencing (RITS) [12, 13]. The RITS complex is composed of Ago1, now binding single-stranded siRNA as a guide for target recognition, and the two RITS-specific subunits Chp1 and Tas3 [12, 13]. Chp1 uses a chromodomain to recognize H3K9me [14], whereas Tas3 bridges Ago1 and Chp1 [15, 16].

With the ability to interact with both H3K9me and target RNA, RITS plays a central role in the self-enforcing cycle of RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly [14]. RITS’ function depends on two major interactions. On the one hand, RITS interacts with the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase complex, which synthesizes double-stranded RNA for secondary siRNA generation [17, 18]. On the other hand, RITS interacts (via bridging by the linker protein Stc1 [19]) with the Clr4 histone methyltransferase-containing complex that methylates the H3 histone to create the H3K9me epigenetic marker [20, 21]. Thus, the formation of RITS is crucial for the generation of siRNA and for the assembly of RNAi-dependent heterochromatin.

The formation of small RNA-containing effector complexes is generally assisted by heat-shock molecular chaperones [2229]. However, the heat-shock molecular chaperones responsible for the RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly remain unidentified. The candidates may belong to one or more of the distinct families of heat-shock proteins 40, 70, and 90 (Hsp40, Hsp70, and Hsp90, respectively) [2224, 30].

Among the three Hsp families, the proteins belonging to the Hsp90 family promote the in vitro formation of small RNA-containing complexes in all species that have been tested [2224, 29]. Notably, however, Hsp90-family proteins appear to act in species-specific manners. For example, the steps that require ATP hydrolysis by Hsp90-family proteins appear to differ among various species. For instance, Hsp90-mediated ATP hydrolysis is required for siRNA duplex loading in animal cells, but is instead required for passenger strand removal in plant cells [23, 24, 31]. Similarly, the formation of small RNA-containing complexes does not necessarily require Hsp70-family proteins. An Hsp70 protein is essential for complex formation in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, but not in the ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila [22, 29]. Therefore, the differences between species should be acknowledged in examining how such chaperones act in RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly.

The S. pombe genome encodes six Hsp70 proteins. These Hsps show high sequence similarity to their counterparts in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), where the cellular roles of Hsp70 s have been thoroughly examined [32]. Among the six S. pombe Hsp70 proteins, Ssa1 and Ssa2, which show high sequence similarity to each other (identity: 94%), are recognized as nucleocytoplasmic Hsp70 proteins [33]. Ssa1 and Ssa2 also exhibit the strongest sequence similarity to the D. melanogaster Hsp70 protein Hsc70-4 (identity: 75% each), which is essential for the formation of a small RNA-containing complex in that organism [22, 30].

The S. pombe genome encodes 26 Hsp40 family proteins, all of which harbor a characteristic DnaJ domain (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). These Hsp40 proteins can be divided into three classes: types I, II, and III [34]. Type-I proteins are also found in S. cerevisiae (Additional file 1: Fig. S3), and have the same names in the two yeast species [32, 35]. Mdj1 and Scj1 localize in mitochondria and the lumen of the ER, respectively [32]. In contrast, Mas5 (also known as Ydj1 in S. cerevisiae) and Xdj1 localize in the cytosol and nucleus [32] and are categorized as nucleocytoplasmic type-I Hsp40 proteins. Among the 26 Hsp40 proteins in S. pombe, Mas5 shows the greatest sequence similarity to the D. melanogaster protein Droj2 (identity: 41%), a protein that promotes the formation of a small RNA-containing complex in vitro [22, 30].

In the present study, we identified the S. pombe molecular chaperone proteins Hsp90 and Mas5 as novel regulators of RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly. Mutations in the genes encoding these proteins caused derepression of transcriptional silencing and decreases in H3K9me at the pericentromeric heterochromatin region, while having little effect on the subtelomeric heterochromatin, which can be maintained in the absence of RNAi. Hsp90 and Mas5 were required in vivo for siRNA generation and chromatin localization of Ago1. In addition, the protein level of Tas3 was substantially reduced in the absence of Mas5, suggesting that Mas5 is responsible for the stability of Tas3, and thus of the RITS RNAi effector complex. Therefore, we propose that these molecular chaperones contribute to the assembly of the RNAi-dependent heterochromatin in S. pombe.

Results

Identification of Hsp90 and Mas5 as silencing factors

In a forward genetic screen for factors that affect pericentromeric silencing [36], we isolated a missense mutation of the hsp90 gene, which encodes the sole Hsp90-family protein in S. pombe (see “Methods” section). In parallel with the genetic screen, we conducted immunoaffinity purification of proteins that interact either with RNA polymerase II or Spt6 and identified an Hsp40-family protein, Mas5, as a silencing factor (see “Methods” section).

With the same monitoring system, we evaluated the silencing state of mutant cells by monitoring the expression of ade6 and ura4 marker genes embedded in the pericentromere regions [37] (Additional file 1: Fig. S4). In the absence of mutations, this screening strain did not appreciably express ade6 or ura4; thus, cells without a silencing defect formed red colonies on a plate with a limited amount of adenine (due to the accumulation of an intermediate of adenine biosynthesis) and grew healthily on a plate containing 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) (a pyrimidine precursor analog that is toxic to ura4-expressing cells) [37] (Fig. 1a). In contrast, cells bearing mutations in the genes encoding the H3K9 histone methyltransferase Clr4 (clr4∆), the Dicer family endoribonuclease Dcr1 (dcr1∆), or the Argonaute protein Ago1 (ago1∆) formed pink colonies (i.e., decreased accumulation of red pigment) and were sensitive to 5-FOA. This result indicated that heterochromatic silencing at the pericentromere requires each of these factors, in agreement with the literature [14]. Importantly, cells harboring a mutation in the genes encoding Hsp90 (hsp90-A4) or Mas5 (mas5∆) formed near-white colonies and exhibited sensitivity to 5-FOA, suggesting that Hsp90 and Mas5 are also required for pericentromeric silencing.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Identification of Hsp90 and Mas5 as silencing factors. a Cells were serially diluted, spotted on normal YES plates (YES) and YES containing limited amount of adenine (low adenine) or 0.1% 5-FOA (5-FOA), and incubated at the indicated temperature for 3 days. Marker integration sites are shown in Additional file 1: Figure S4. b Results of sequencing of the antisense strand of the hsp90 gene. Arrows indicate the position of the base substitution. The wild-type cytosine at position 97 (with respect to the ORF start), which is guanine in the antisense strand, was replaced with thymine (adenine in the antisense strand) in the mutant. c Domain structure of Hsp90 family proteins. The N-terminal ATPase domains (ATPase), middle domains (M), and C-terminal domains (CT) are indicated. The names of proteins are associated with two-letter abbreviations indicating the species: “sp” for Schizosaccharomyces pombe (UniProt id: P41887), “sc” for Saccharomyces cerevisiae (P02829), “hs” for Homo sapience (P07900), and “ec” for Escherichia coli (P0A6Z3). The amino acid length (a.a.) of the proteins is shown. The position of R33C substitution is indicated with an asterisk. d Alignment of protein sequences around the R33C mutation. Residue numbers for the first and last amino acid residues for each protein interval are shown. Identical and similar residues are indicated as asterisks and colons, respectively, as seen in a standard ClustalW output. The residues corresponding to the Arg-33 in the fission yeast Hsp90 are colored in blue. The catalytic glutamate residues corresponding to the Glu-33 in budding yeast Hsp82 are colored in red

The formation of near-white colonies could be caused by a defect in red pigment formation. However, as hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ mutant cells not harboring the pericentromeric marker genes formed red colonies (Additional file 1: Fig. S5), Hsp90 and Mas5 appeared not to contribute to pigment formation. In addition, hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ mutant cells harboring the pericentromeric marker genes grew faster than wild-type cells on Edinburgh minimal medium with supplements (EMMS) lacking adenine (Additional file 1: Fig. S6A), suggesting that the ade6 marker gene was indeed expressed by these mutations. EMMS medium lacking uracil was not suitable to monitor the expression level of the pericentromeric ura4 marker gene, because of its leaky repression in the wild-type cells and the slow growth phenotype of the Hsp mutants (Additional file 1: Fig. S6A).

The hsp90-A4 mutant gene had a cytosine-to-thymine base substitution at position 97 (from the start of the ORF) (Fig. 1b), causing a deduced arginine to cysteine substitution at amino acid 33 (R33C). The Arg-33 residue is located in the ATPase domain of Hsp90 and is highly conserved from bacteria to humans (Figs. 1c, d). In S. cerevisiae, the corresponding amino acid (Arg-32) has been implicated in the modulation of ATP hydrolysis [38, 39]. Although Arg-32 in the S. cerevisiae homolog does not directly contact ATP, the residue forms hydrogen bonds with the adjacent catalytic residue Glu-33 (Glu-34 in the S. pombe protein) and with a residue in the Hsp90 middle domain [39]. Through these intramolecular contacts, Arg-32 is thought to be involved in ATP hydrolysis and conformational changes of the Hsp90 protein [38, 39]. Replacement of the S. pombe Arg-33 with cysteine is expected to disrupt these intramolecular contacts, implying that the derepression of the pericentromeric silencing in the mutant is caused by a decrease in the ATPase activity of Hsp90.

Hsp40 protein Xdj1, as well as Hsp70 proteins Ssa1 and Ssa2, is not required for pericentromeric silencing

Identification of Hsp90 and Mas5 as silencing factors prompted us to examine whether other molecular chaperones also contribute to pericentromeric silencing. Mas5 is classified as a nucleocytoplasmic type-I Hsp40 protein. There is another protein that falls into this classification: Xdj1 (Additional file 1: Figs. S2 and S3). Therefore, we tested the involvement of Xdj1 in the silencing of the pericentromeric ade6 marker gene. As shown in Fig. 2a, null mutations in the gene encoding Xdj1 (xdj1∆) did not lead to the formation of pink colonies, suggesting that Xdj1 does not have a major role in the silencing.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Xdj1, Ssa1, and Ssa2 are dispensable for silencing of the pericentromeric marker gene. a, b Silencing assay of Hsp40 mutants (a) and of Hsp70 mutants (b). Cells were serially diluted, spotted on normal YES plates (YES) and YES plates containing limited amounts of adenine (Low adenine), and incubated at 30 °C for 3 days. c Strand-specific RT-qPCR for the pericentromeric ade6 marker gene. Values are presented as means + SD (n = 3)

Mas5 has a DnaJ domain, which has been implicated in the regulation of the ATPase activity of Hsp70 proteins [40, 41]. There are two nucleocytoplasmic Hsp70 proteins in S. pombe: Ssa1 and Ssa2 (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Both Ssa1 and Ssa2 physically interact with Mas5 [33] and (among the S. pombe Hsp70 proteins) show the highest sequence similarity to the D. melanogaster Hsc70-4. This observation raised the possibility that these two proteins might also act with Mas5 to silence pericentromeric transcription. Nonetheless, as shown in Fig. 2b, single- and double-null mutations in the genes encoding Ssa1 and Ssa2 (ssa1∆, ssa2∆, and ssa1∆ ssa2) did not lead to the formation of pink colonies, indicating that pericentromeric silencing remained intact in the absence of these nucleocytoplasmic Hsp70 proteins.

To confirm that the colony color reflected the transcription of the ade6 marker gene, we performed strand-specific reverse transcription followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis (Fig. 2c). Due to the assembly of heterochromatin over the marker gene, the expression level of ade6 was very low in wild-type cells. In contrast, ade6 transcription was increased in clr4∆ cells, in which heterochromatin was not formed. In agreement with the results of the colony color analyses (Fig. 2a, b), null mutations in other genes encoding Hsp40 (xdj1) and Hsp70 (ssa1 and ssa2) did not cause substantial increases in the transcript level of the marker gene. Thus, although the nucleocytoplasmic Hsp40 protein Mas5 appears to have a role in pericentromeric silencing, the nucleocytoplasmic Hsp70 proteins Ssa1 and Ssa2 do not appear to be involved in this process.

Hsp90 and Mas5 are required for RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly

In the S. pombe pericentromere, silencing of the inserted marker genes occurs passively, reflecting the chromatin state of neighboring pericentromeric repeat regions. Therefore, we next performed strand-specific RT-qPCR to examine the levels of transcripts from the ade6 and ura4 marker genes as well as those from the dogentai (dg) pericentromeric repeats (Fig. 3a and Additional file 1: Fig. S6B). In wild-type cells, these pericentromeric transcripts accumulated at very low levels, as these regions were silenced by heterochromatin (Additional file 1: Fig. S6C). In contrast, these transcripts accumulated to higher levels in dcr1∆, ago1∆, and clr4∆ mutant cells, indicating that silencing was derepressed by these mutations [8, 20]. Importantly, hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ cells also accumulated the pericentromeric transcripts. These results suggested that Hsp90 and Mas5 are involved in the silencing of both the inserted marker genes and the native pericentromeric repeats.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Hsp90 and Mas5 are required for the assembly of heterochromatin at the pericentromere. a, b Strand-specific RT-qPCR for the pericentromeric transcripts from the ade6 gene and dg repeats (a), and for the subtelomeric transcripts from the tlh genes (b). For the dg repeats and tlh genes, transcripts matching forward (Fw) and reverse (Rv) strands were analyzed. Values are normalized to that of the sense strand of ribosomal 28S RNA. c ChIP-qPCR using an antibody against H3K9me2 for the pericentromeric ade6 gene, dg repeats, and tlh genes. Color keys under the graphs in ac correspond to the key shown in a. The euchromatic gene act1 was used as an internal control locus. d ChIP-qPCR of Myc-Ago1 using an antibody against Myc for the pericentromeric ade6 gene, dg repeats, and tlh genes. For all panels, values are presented as means + SD (n = 3)

Derepression of pericentromeric silencing can be caused either by a mutation in the factors that are generally required for heterochromatin assembly, such as those directly involved in H3K9 methylation, or by a mutation in the RNAi factors, which direct H3K9me formation in a locus-specific manner. In the former case, silencing in the subtelomere regions and the mating-type locus, which can be maintained in the absence of RNAi factors [57], should also be derepressed; in the latter case, silencing in those non-pericentromeric regions should not be affected. To test the possibility that Hsp90 and Mas5 act as general heterochromatin factors, we examined the expression levels of the subtelomeric telomere-linked helicase (tlh) genes and the centromere homology (cenH) transcript from the mating-type locus by strand-specific RT-qPCR (Fig. 3b and Additional file 1: Fig. S7). The silencing of the tlh genes and of the cenH transcript was maintained both in wild-type and RNAi-defective mutants (dcr1∆ and ago1∆), but was derepressed in the presence of clr4∆, as reported previously [6, 7, 11]. Notably, silencing of the tlh genes was maintained in hsp90-A4 cells and only derepressed by 2–13% in mas5∆ cells, as compared to the fully depressed state in the clr4∆ cells. Similarly, silencing of the cenH transcript was not markedly affected by the hsp90-A4 or mas5∆ mutation.

These data suggest that Hsp90 and Mas5 are involved in the RNAi-dependent assembly of heterochromatin. To test this hypothesis, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR) to monitor the level of dimethylation of histone H3 at Lys-9 (H3K9me2) at the ade6, dg, and tlh regions (Fig. 3c). In wild-type cells, the three tested regions exhibited strong enrichment of H3K9me2 compared to that at the euchromatic gene act1, which encodes actin. In the absence of the histone methyltransferase Clr4 (clr4∆), the H3K9me2 mark was abolished. When the RNAi pathway was defective (dcr1∆ and ago1∆), H3K9me2 was completely abolished at the ade6 gene, but was only moderately decreased (i.e., 32–55% compared to the wild-type control) at the pericentromeric dg repeats and was maintained at the subtelomeric tlh genes. These observations are consistent with the results of previous reports [6, 8, 42]. In agreement with the results of RT-qPCR (Fig. 3a, b), hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ mutations caused reductions in the level of H3K9me2 at the pericentromeric regions but not at the subtelomeres. These results suggest that Hsp90 and Mas5 act like RNAi factors in the assembly of heterochromatin at the pericentromeres.

If Hsp90 and Mas5 are involved in RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly, mutations in these proteins may affect chromatin localization of Ago1. Therefore, we constructed mutant strains that also express amino (N)-terminally Myc-tagged Ago1 (Myc-Ago1) from its own promoter [12] and examined the chromatin localization level of Myc-Ago1 by ChIP-qPCR (Fig. 3d). In wild-type cells, Myc-Ago1 was enriched at the ade6 and dg regions when compared to the level at the internal control act1 gene. This result indicated that the Myc tagging did not perturb the chromatin localization of Ago1. In accordance with a previous report [12], the enrichment of Myc-Ago1 in dcr1∆ cells was as low as that of the untagged control in the pericentromeric ade6 and dg regions. Similarly, the chromatin localization of Myc-Ago1 in the pericentromeric regions was abrogated in hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ cells. Therefore, Hsp90 and Mas5 appeared to be required for the localization of Ago1 in the pericentromere.

Hsp90 and Mas5 are required for the formation of the RNAi effector complex

As molecular chaperone proteins, Hsp90 and Mas5 may contribute to effector complex formation in the RNAi pathway. To examine this possibility, we first tested whether the protein level of Ago1 is altered in the mutant cells (Fig. 4a). Yeast strains that did (FLAG-Ago1) or did not (untagged) express N-terminally FLAG-tagged Ago1 from its own promoter were used for this analysis [43]. The amount of FLAG-Ago1, Hsp90, and α-tubulin in cell extracts were examined by western blotting. The α-tubulin signals indicated that equal amounts of samples were loaded on the gel. Interestingly, the amount of Hsp90 itself was not altered in hsp90-A4 cells. This observation suggested that the function, rather than the quantity, of the Hsp90 protein is affected by the R33C mutation. As the FLAG-Ago1 signal appeared to be decreased in the mutant cells, we conducted western blotting with twofold serial dilutions (Additional File 1: Fig. S8). The results indicated that the signal intensity of FLAG-Ago1 in hsp90-A4 or mas5∆ cells was less than a half of that in wild-type cells. These results suggest that Hsp90 and Mas5 are required to maintain the proper amount of Ago1 protein in cells.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Hsp90 and Mas5 are required for the formation of siRNA-containing Ago1 complexes. a Detection of proteins in whole-cell extracts by western blotting. Antibodies against FLAG epitope, Hsp90, and α-tubulin were used. b Detection of pericentromeric siRNA. Equal amounts of total RNA extracted from untagged cells or from cells expressing FLAG-Ago1 were loaded into each lane. Pericentromeric siRNA (cen siRNA) was detected by northern blotting with specific probes (see “Methods” section). U6 snRNA was used as a loading control. c Detection of pericentromeric siRNA in Ago1 complex. FLAG-Ago1 complex was immunoprecipitated with an antibody against the FLAG epitope. Pericentromeric siRNA extracted from the immunoprecipitates was detected by northern blotting (cen siRNA). Signal intensities of the pericentromeric siRNA relative to the wild-type FLAG-Ago1 sample are indicated. Successful immunoprecipitation was validated by means of western blotting with an antibody against the FLAG epitope (FLAG-Ago1). Untagged cells were used as negative controls. d, e Detection of FLAG-Ago1 in Arb1-Myc (d) and Tas3-Myc (e) immunoprecipitates. Soluble extracts (Input) and immunoprecipitates (Myc-IP) were separated on SDS-PAGE and detected with antibodies against the Myc and FLAG epitopes; the loading control protein was detected with an antibody against α-tubulin. Asterisks, background signals. Signal intensities of FLAG-Ago1 normalized with those of Arb1-Myc are indicated

Next, we examined the amount of pericentromeric siRNA by northern blotting (Fig. 4b). In total RNA extracts from wild-type cells, we detected 21–24-nt siRNA that were complementary to the pericentromeric repeats; U6 small nuclear RNA was used as a loading control. Comparable amounts of siRNA were detected irrespective of the FLAG tag, indicating that (as described previously [12]) the epitope tagging of Ago1 did not affect siRNA generation. In dcr1∆ cells, in which siRNA generation should be abolished, the siRNA was not detected, again consistent with previous results [44]. Remarkably, siRNA was undetectable in hsp90-A4 or mas5∆ cells, suggesting that Hsp90 and Mas5 have major roles in siRNA generation in S. pombe.

The above data suggested that Ago1 does not bind appropriate amounts of pericentromeric siRNA in hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ cells. To confirm this hypothesis, we attempted to detect siRNA in FLAG-Ago1-containing immunoprecipitates by northern blotting (Fig. 4c). Specifically, we subjected extracts from cells expressing FLAG-Ago1 to immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibody. Cells that did not express FLAG-Ago1 were used as negative controls. Successful immunoprecipitation was confirmed by detecting FLAG-Ago1 by means of western blotting (Fig. 4c, FLAG-Ago1). In this analysis, we detected faint background RNA signals of unknown origin even in the immunoprecipitates from untagged strains (Fig. 4c, untagged, cen siRNA). However, these RNA signals were very weak (i.e., 6–12% compared to the pericentromeric siRNA signal detected in the immunoprecipitate from wild-type cells expressing FLAG-Ago1) (Fig. 4c, FLAG-Ago1, cen siRNA). As expected, the signal intensity of Ago1-bound siRNA from dcr1∆ cells was approximately 96% weaker than that from wild-type cells. Notably, the Ago1-bound siRNA signals from hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ cells were comparable to that from dcr1∆ cells. The amounts of FLAG-Ago1 protein in the immunoprecipitates differed among samples (Fig. 4c, FLAG-Ago1); however, this magnitude of difference did not appear to explain the observed decrease in siRNA. These data suggested that Hsp90 and Mas5 are required for the formation of functional, siRNA-containing effector complex in vivo.

As the loading of siRNA onto Ago1 depends on the formation of the ARC complex [12], we next investigated the interaction between Ago1 and Arb1 in the mutant cells. We constructed strains that co-expressed carboxy (C)-terminally Myc-tagged Arb1 (Arb1-Myc) and FLAG-Ago1 from the respective native promoters. We subjected extracts of the resulting strains to immunoprecipitation of Arb1-Myc, and examined the amounts of Arb1-Myc and FLAG-Ago1 in the immunoprecipitates by western blotting (Fig. 4d). In the soluble extracts (Input) from wild-type strains, comparable amounts of FLAG-Ago1 were detected irrespective of the Myc tagging of Arb1. This result demonstrated that the double tagging did not affect the bulk amount of Ago1 in the wild-type background. In the soluble extracts (Input) from hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ cells, the signal intensity of Arb1-Myc was slightly lower than that from the wild-type cells. This observation suggests that both Hsp90 and Mas5 are required to maintain Arb1 levels in the cell. It is possible that Hsp90 regulates Arb1 at the RNA level, as the expression of arb1 mRNA was decreased in hsp90-A4 mutant cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S9). Nonetheless, comparable amounts of Arb1-Myc were detected in the immunoprecipitates (Myc-IP) from Arb1-Myc-expressing cells, permitting further analysis of the interaction between Arb1 and Ago1. Notably, in the wild-type background, FLAG-Ago1 was detected in an Arb1-Myc-dependent manner, indicating that double tagging did not disrupt the interaction between Ago1 and Arb1. In contrast, in the immunoprecipitates from hsp90-A4, mas5∆, and arb2∆ cells, Arb1-associated Ago1 signals were lower than that in the wild-type sample (Fig. 4d, Myc-IP). These observations suggested that Hsp90 and Mas5 contribute to the formation of the ARC complex in vivo, as previously reported for Arb2 [12].

Next, we examined whether the formation of the RITS complex in vivo is affected by the mutations. We constructed strains that co-express C-terminally Myc-tagged Tas3 (Tas3-Myc) and FLAG-Ago1 from the respective native promoters. Unexpectedly, Tas3-Myc protein was difficult to detect in the mas5∆ background (Fig. 4e, Input; Additional file 1: Fig. S10). RT-qPCR analysis showed that tas3 mRNA accumulated to higher (not lower) levels in the mas5∆ mutant (compared to the wild-type background) (Additional file 1: Fig. S9). This observation suggested that Mas5 is required to stabilize the level of Tas3 protein in S. pombe cells.

When wild-type extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Myc antibody, FLAG-Ago1 was detected in the immunoprecipitates in a Tas3-Myc-dependent manner (Fig. 4e, Myc-IP), indicating that Tas3-Myc formed a complex with FLAG-Ago1 in vivo. FLAG-Ago1 also was detected in the immunoprecipitates from dcr1∆ cells, as reported previously [45]. In arb1∆ and arb2∆ cells, the amount of FLAG-Ago1 interacting with Tas3-Myc was decreased to background levels (Fig. 4d, Myc-IP long exposure), indicating that the ARC subunits Arb1 and Arb2 are required for the formation of RITS, consistent with the previous report [45]. However, comparable amounts of FLAG-Ago1 were detected in the Tas3-Myc immunoprecipitates in wild-type and hsp90-A4 cells, suggesting that this hsp90 mutation does not impair the interaction between Ago1 and Tas3.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that the S. pombe molecular chaperones Hsp90 and Mas5 are required for the silencing, heterochromatin assembly, and chromatin localization of Ago1 in the pericentromere (Figs. 1 and 3). In contrast, the heterochromatin assembled at the subtelomeric regions and mating-type locus, which can be maintained in the absence of RNAi, was not strongly affected by the mutations in Hsp90 or Mas5 (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1: Fig. S7). We also showed that the in vivo generation of siRNA complementary to the pericentromeric repeats required these chaperones (Fig. 4b, c). Furthermore, we showed that Mas5 contributes to maintenance of protein levels of Tas3 in the cells (Fig. 4e). Together, these results indicated that Hsp90 and Mas5 are involved in RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly in S. pombe (Fig. 5).
Figure 5
Fig. 5

Model. Formation of the siRNA-containing complexes ARC and RITS are key steps in the assembly of RNAi-dependent heterochromatin at the pericentromere. In ARC and RITS complexes, the Argonaute protein Ago1 binds double-stranded and single-stranded siRNA, respectively. The subunits of the non-chromatin-associated ARC complex are responsible for the loading of siRNA onto Ago1, which is then incorporated into the RITS complex. RITS acts in the center of the self-enforcing loop of RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly. RITS recruits the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase complex (RDRC) for siRNA generation, while also recruiting (via Stc1) the Clr4-containing methyltransferase complex that methylates H3K9. The generation of siRNA and loading of siRNA onto Ago1 in vivo require Hsp90 and Mas5. Mas5 also maintains the protein level of the RITS subunit Tas3. Thus, Hsp90 and Mas5 are required for RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly

Hsp90 has been shown to promote the formation of an RNAi effector complex in plants and animals [2224, 30]. However, previous studies on the relationship between Hsp90 and effector complexes were based mainly on in vitro experiments; few of these studies examined the in vivo effects of Hsp90 inhibition on the chromatin state. Notably, previous works did not examine whether Hsp90 is required for RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly. In this regard, the discovery of Hsp90 as a silencing factor in S. pombe may be an important step for understanding how this chaperone contributes to the epigenetic regulation of chromatin formation.

We observed that some H3K9me2 remained at the pericentromeric ade6 marker gene in hsp90-A4 cells, while H3K9me2 levels were decreased to background levels in mas5∆ cells (Fig. 3c). Given this result, we cannot confidently state that Hsp90 is essential for RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly. The residual H3K9me2 may reflect residual activity of Hsp90 and residual siRNA, which would be technically difficult to detect as a positive signal by Northern blotting, in the hsp90-A4 cells. Alternatively, Hsp90 may be important, but not essential, for RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly. The hsp90 gene is essential for growth, precluding silencing analysis in a gene deletion mutant. The development of specific genetic tools may be necessary to determine whether Hsp90 is essential for RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly in vivo.

Hsp40 proteins act as modulators of Hsp70 proteins [32, 46, 47]. In D. melanogaster, the Hsp70 protein Hsc70-4 physically interacts with Argonaute proteins and is essential for the formation of RNAi effector complexes. The D. melanogaster Hsp40 protein Droj2 also is associated with Argonaute proteins [22, 30]. Droj2 protein is not essential for the effector complex formation but has been shown to promote the effector complex formation in vitro [30]. Droj2 is categorized as a nucleocytoplasmic type-I Hsp40 and exhibits higher sequence identity to the S. pombe Mas5 (41%) than to the other S. pombe paralog Xdj1 (29%). Therefore, it is possible that Mas5, as a conserved Hsp40 protein, promotes the formation of the RNAi effector complex in the S. pombe cells.

Although we identified a nucleocytoplasmic type-I Hsp40 (Mas5) as a silencing factor that is essential for RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly, we demonstrated that the double-null mutation in the genes encoding the nucleocytoplasmic Hsp70 proteins Ssa1 and Ssa2 does not cause a detectable defect in pericentromeric silencing in fission yeast (Fig. 2). Ssa1 and Ssa2 each show 75% identity to D. melanogaster Hsc70-4. Involvement of the remaining four S. pombe Hsp70 proteins in silencing is difficult to imagine, given that these fission yeast paralogs exhibit restricted intracellular locations. Interestingly, in the ciliated protozoan T. thermophila, inhibition of Hsp70 does not impair the formation of the effector complex in vitro [29]. Therefore, it is possible that nucleocytoplasmic Hsp70 is dispensable for RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly in S. pombe. In such cases, Mas5 may be acting in an Hsp70-independent manner: DnaJ domain-independent functions of Hsp40 proteins have been proposed in many studies, as reviewed in references [46, 47].

Despite several attempts to detect physical interactions between the S. pombe heat-shock molecular chaperones and Ago1 using co-immunoprecipitation from cell extracts, we were unable to detect a positive signal stronger than background level (data not shown). This suggests that the assumed physical interaction is transient, or that the involvement of these molecular chaperones in the formation of the siRNA-containing effector complexes is indirect at the molecular level. As the S. pombe RNAi pathway forms a self-reinforcing loop that is required for and is coupled to the assembly of the pericentromeric heterochromatin, a defect in any step in the loop may result in essentially the same result: loss of siRNA generation [17]. Thus, we cannot rule out the possibility that the formation of the effector complex is inhibited in vivo because the mutations in Hsp90 and Mas5 inhibit other steps in the RNAi pathway. Notably, the decrease in Tas3 protein levels observed in mas5∆ cells, (Fig. 4e and Additional file 1: Fig. S10) may eliminate siRNA generation. Thus, Mas5 may contribute to RNAi-dependent heterochromatin formation by maintaining the amount of functional Tas3. Note that Mas5 has been affinity-captured by Stc1 [19], suggesting a contribution of Mas5 in RNAi-dependent heterochromatin formation through this interaction. The hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ mutants grew much more slowly than the wild-type control, while also exhibiting temperature-sensitive growth; these phenotypes were not seen in the other silencing mutants evaluated here (Fig. 1a). Thus, Hsp90 and Mas5 appear to have roles beyond the RNAi pathway, affecting cell growth and tolerance to heat stress.

Colony colors of canonical heterochromatin mutants (i.e., clr4∆ and dcr1∆) harboring the ade6+ marker gene in the pericentromere (otr1R(SphI)::ade6+) are often described as “white” or “light pink” in the literature [19, 48, 49]. This is true when the auxotrophic missense allele ade6-m210, which can be interallelically complemented by another auxotrophic allele ade6-m216 [50], is located in the endogenous ade6 locus on Chromosome III (Additional file 1: Fig. S11). However, when the deletion allele ade6-DN/N is used instead of ade6-m210, the canonical heterochromatin mutants form apparently darker “pink” colonies [36] (Additional file 1: Fig. S11). Similarly, colony colors of trichostatin A-treated cells are dependent on the endogenous ade6 alleles [37]. Thus, the ade6-DN/N-driven enhanced pigmentation may help us visually examine the degree of silencing defects [36].

We noted that hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ cells formed much “brighter” colonies and grew healthier than clr4∆ or dcr1∆ cells on the adenine-limiting (Fig. 1a) and adenine-lacking (Additional file 1: Fig. S6A) plates, respectively. The colony brightness phenotype of hsp90-A4 and mas5∆ mutants in the ade6-DN/N background was characteristic of this class of mutants, permitting them to be readily distinguished from canonical silencing mutants such as clr4∆ [36]. While other bright colony-forming silencing mutants have been isolated in similar forward genetic screens, all of those mutants exhibited alterations in RNA polymerase II-driven transcription [9, 11, 36]. Although the mechanism that causes this brightness is not yet clear, studying the defect caused by these mutants may lead to an understanding of a yet-unknown regulatory layer of epigenetic silencing. In this regard, colony colors of heterochromatin mutants that have been studied in the ade6-m210 background [19, 48, 49, 51] might be worth being examined in the ade6-DN/N background to visually classify the mutations.

Conclusions

Based on the results presented in this study, we propose that molecular chaperones Hsp90 and Mas5 are required for RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly in S. pombe. Although the underlying molecular mechanism remains to be elucidated, mutations in the genes encoding these chaperones greatly decreased the levels of pericentromeric siRNA and H3K9me2 in vivo. Our results suggest that inhibition of the counterparts of these chaperones in other species may have similar destructive effects on chromatin regulation.

Methods

Genetic manipulations The S. pombe strains and primers for genetic manipulations used in this study are listed in Additional file 2: Tables S1 and S2, respectively. General yeast manipulation methods and culture conditions were as documented elsewhere [36, 52]. For N-terminal tagging of Ago1, p3FLAGago1N-natMX4 or p3MYCago1N-natMX4 was integrated into the ago1 locus. To construct these plasmids, 3xFLAG or 3xMyc (respectively) epitope-encoding sequences, including an NdeI linker, were inserted between the promoter (extending from nt -259 to the ORF start codon) and the sequences encoding the N-terminus (from the second codon to nt 733 of the ORF) of the ago1+ gene in the natMX gene plasmid. The respective plasmids were digested with XhoI, purified by ethanol precipitation, and introduced into host strains using a yeast transformation kit for S. pombe (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. clonNAT-resistant clones were selected on YES plates containing 100 mg/L clonNAT (Werner BioAgents). All of the tagged sequences were subjected to DNA sequencing to confirm that no additional mutation had been introduced during construction.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation Chromatin immunoprecipitation and subsequent qPCR were performed as described elsewhere [36]. The primary antibody used for immunoprecipitation of H3K9me2, the secondary antibody-conjugated magnetic beads, and the primers used for qPCR were as described in the previous study [36]. Cells growing logarithmically in YES medium at 30 °C were used for the analyses. Cell density in each culture was measured with a particle counter (CDA-500, Sysmex) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To avoid inaccurate measurements caused by cell flocculation, cells were diluted and briefly sonicated by directly immersing the cuvettes in an ultrasonic cleaner bath (Branson 5510) prior to counting.

RNA preparation, RT-qPCR, and northern blotting Methods for total RNA extraction, RT-qPCR, and northern blotting were as documented elsewhere [11, 36, 44]. For the northern blotting of pericentromeric siRNA, we used oligonucleotide DNA probes that are complementary to the sequenced siRNAs named “A” to “L” [44, 53]. The siRNA named “D” (5′-UGGAUUAAGGAGAAGCGGUA-3′) [53] was omitted for northern detection, because the probe complementary to this sequence tends to detect unwanted background RNA. For northern blotting of RNA in FLAG-Ago1 immunoprecipitates, RNA was prepared as follows. Extracts of cells growing logarithmically in YES at 30 °C were obtained as described in the immunoprecipitation and western blotting section. For each biological sample, 4 × 108 cells (two tubes for one biological sample) were used for the analysis. The cell extracts from the two tubes were combined, and 440 µL of IP buffer (50 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.5, 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, and 0.1% Na-deoxycholate) containing protease inhibitors (P08215, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to obtain 880 µL of whole-cell extract for each biological sample. An aliquot (200 µL) of secondary antibody-conjugated magnetic beads was prepared as described in the immunoprecipitation and western blotting section. After centrifuging the pooled cell extract at 20,000×g at 4 °C for 15 min, an aliquot (850 µL) of the resulting supernatant was incubated with the magnetic beads for 2 h at 4 °C. Beads were washed twice with 500 µL per wash of IP buffer containing protease inhibitors and resuspended in 500 µL of IP buffer containing protease inhibitors. Of the 500 µL of immunoprecipitate, one 100 µL aliquot was stored for evaluation by western blotting. For the remaining 400 µL, the supernatant was removed and the beads were suspended in 250 µL of AE buffer (50 mM sodium acetate pH 5.2, 10 mM EDTA). After mixing with 250 µL of citrate-saturated phenol, samples were frozen at − 80 °C and thawed at 65 °C. After centrifugation at 20,000×g at 25 °C for 5 min, the aqueous layer was mixed with 250 µL of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1). After centrifugation at 20,000×g at 25 °C for 5 min, the resulting aqueous layer was mixed with 25 µL of 3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2, 625 µL of ethanol, and 2 µL of Ethachinmate (312-01791, Nippon Gene) and centrifuged at 20,000×g at 4 °C for 20 min. The pellet was rinsed with 500 µL of 80% ethanol and resuspended in 20 µL of DEPC-treated water. An aliquot (10 µL) of the RNA sample was used for the northern analysis.

Immunoprecipitation and western blotting Cells (2 × 108) growing logarithmically in YES at 30 °C were washed with 10 mL of distilled water and with 1 mL of IP buffer. Cell pellets were resuspended in 220 µL of IP buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail. Cells were disrupted in a Multi-Beads Shocker (MB400U, Yasui Kikai). IP buffer (400 µL) containing protease inhibitors was added to the cell extract, and the mixture was then centrifuged at 20,000×g at 4 °C for 15 min to obtain the supernatant as input extract. An aliquot (200 µL) of M-280 anti-mouse sheep antibody-conjugated magnetic beads (112-02, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was washed twice with IP buffer, incubated with 3 µL of mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody (M2, Sigma-Aldrich) at 4 °C for 2 h, and washed three times with IP buffer. Beads were resuspended in 500 µL of the input extract, incubated at 4 °C for 2 h, washed three times with 500 µL per wash of IP buffer containing protease inhibitors, and resuspended in 50 µL of SDS sample buffer. Western blotting and detection of epitope-tagged proteins were performed as described previously [52]. Mouse monoclonal anti-Myc antibody 9E10 (1:2000), anti-G196 ascites (1:2000), anti-α-tubulin antibody DM1A (1:2000), and anti-FLAG antibody M2 (1:2000) were used as primary antibodies. HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (1:5000, Rockland Immunochemicals) was used as secondary antibody.

Isolation of hsp90-A4 silencing mutant In a genetic screen described previously [36], six mutants that exhibited a defect in pericentromeric silencing were isolated; characterization of three of these mutants was reported elsewhere [11, 36]. For the present work, we characterized one of the remaining three mutants, A4, which was named after its original mutant pool designation (“A”). Sequence analysis of the whole genome of an A4 strain was performed as described previously [36]. Five missense mutations were found in the protein-coding genes of the A4 genome. Genetic analysis of the A4 strain revealed that a mutation in the hsp90 gene, causing the R33C mutation, could not be genetically separated from the A4 phenotype: all of the tested A4 progeny with the silencing phenotype possessed the mutation (n = 9). Reintroduction of the mutation into the wild-type genome via a selective marker (kanMX::hsp90-A4) as described previously [36] yielded the same phenotype as that observed in the original A4 mutant (Additional file 1: Fig. S12). Therefore, we named the mutant allele hsp90-A4.

Identification of Mas5 as a silencing factor In order to identify candidate proteins that might act as silencing factors, we screened for proteins that interacted with either RNA polymerase II or Spt6, an RNA polymerase II-associated histone chaperone, both of which are involved in heterochromatic silencing [36, 54, 55]. G196-tagged protein complexes were immunoprecipitated from four strains [52]: a wild-type strain not expressing a G196-tagged protein (HKM-1100); a wild-type strain expressing C-terminally G196-tagged Spt6 from its own promoter (HKM-2064); a iws1∆ strain expressing the G196-tagged Spt6 (HKM-2066); and a wild-type strain expressing C-terminally G196-tagged Rpb3, an RNA polymerase II subunit, from its own promoter (HKM-2061).

For preparing anti-G196 antibody-conjugated Sepharose beads, 500 µL of Protein G-Sepharose (4 Fast Flow, GE Healthcare) was washed three times with 10 mL per wash of 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0. The beads were resuspended in 10 mL of 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, mixed with 2 mL of anti-G196 murine ascites, and incubated overnight under rotation at 4 °C. After removal of the supernatant, the beads were washed three times with 10 mL per wash of borate buffer (0.2 M sodium borate, pH 9.0). The beads were resuspended in borate buffer containing 20 mM of dimethyl pimelimidate dihydrochloride (D8388, Sigma-Aldrich), rotated for 30 min at room temperature, and washed twice with 10 mL per wash of 0.2 M ethanolamine, pH 8.0. Beads then were resuspended in 10 mL of 0.2 M ethanolamine, pH 8.0; rotated for 2 h at room temperature; washed twice with 10 mL per wash of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS); washed once with 10 mL of 100 mM glycine–HCl, pH 2.5; washed twice with 0.2 M Tris–HCl, pH 8.0; washed twice with 10 mL per wash of IP buffer containing 0.05% sodium azide; and finally suspended in 500 µL of IP buffer containing 0.05% sodium azide. The resulting antibody-conjugated Sepharose beads were stored at 4 °C.

Extracts of cells growing logarithmically in YES at 30 °C were obtained as described in the immunoprecipitation and western blotting section. For each biological sample, 1 × 109 cells (five tubes for one biological sample) were used for the analysis. Cell extracts from two tubes were combined and 1.3 mL of IP buffer containing protease inhibitors was added to obtain 2.4 mL of whole-cell extract for each biological sample. Insoluble debris was removed by centrifuging the extract three times at 20,000×g at 4 °C for 15 min. An aliquot (30 µL) of the anti-G196 antibody-conjugated Sepharose beads (prepared as described above) were washed with 1 mL of IP buffer. The beads were suspended in a 1-mL aliquot of the soluble extract and incubated for 3 h at 4 °C under rotation. After removal of the supernatant, the beads were suspended in another 1-mL aliquot of the soluble extract and incubated for 3 h at 4 °C under rotation. The beads were washed four times with IP buffer containing protease inhibitors and finally suspended in 10 mL of sample buffer. The precipitates were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel, silver-stained (Additional file 1: Fig. S13), and subjected to mass spectrometric analysis as described previously [56]. Proteins identified with over 95% probability were assigned using the scaffold3 software ver. 3.5.1 (Proteome Software, Inc.). Isolation of transcription-related proteins in an Spt6- or Rpb3-dependent manner was confirmed by successful, selective co-immunoprecipitation (Additional file 2: Table S3). Non-essential genes corresponding to ten of these proteins were (individually) genetically deleted and evaluated for contribution to the silencing of the ade6 marker gene inserted in the pericentromere by observing the colony color of deletants growing on YES medium that contained limiting amounts of adenine (Additional file 2: Table S4). In this screen, Mas5 was identified as a potential silencing regulator.

Drawing of phylogenetic trees and of schematic representations of homologous proteins Amino acid sequences and Gene3D domain information for Hsp40 and Hsp70 proteins were obtained using the BioMart tool of Ensemble (Release 35). The dataset for the S. pombe proteins was ASM294v2; S. cerevisiae, R64-1-1; and D. melanogaster, BDGP6. Phylogenetic trees in Additional file 1: Figs. S1 and S3 were drawn with the web software Phylogeny.fr [57]. Order of the proteins was manually changed on the web site. Colors for protein names were changed (using the vector design software Graphic ver. 3.0.1 (Autodesk, Inc.)) by processing the scalable vector graphics images that were downloaded from the Phylogeny.fr web site. Schematic representations of proteins in Additional file 1: Figs. S1–S3 were drawn with the generic graphic functions “plot” and “polygon” of the R statistical environment. Localization signals and transmembrane helices were predicted with the web software TargetP, ver. 1.1 [58], and TMHMM, ver. 2.0 [59], respectively.

Abbreviations

ARC: 

Argonaute small interfering RNA chaperone

ER: 

endoplasmic reticulum

5-FOA: 

5-fluoroorotic acid

Hsp: 

heat-shock molecular chaperone protein

Hsp40: 

heat-shock protein 40

Hsp70: 

heat-shock protein 70

Hsp90: 

heat-shock protein 90

H3K9me: 

methylation of histone H3 at Lys-9

RNAi: 

RNA interference

RITS: 

RNA-induced transcriptional silencing

siRNA: 

small interfering RNA

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

KO performed most of the experiments. KO and TI performed the northern blotting analyses. JN and KS performed the mass spectrometry analysis. TU and YM were involved in study design and material preparation. KO and HK designed the study. HK was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. R. C. Allshire for providing strains and Dr. K. Kawakami for generating yeast strains, and we would like to acknowledge the technical expertise of the Interdisciplinary Center for Science Research, Organization for Research and Academic Information, Shimane University.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP26116513 (to HK), and by a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellow (to KO, 13J07740).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemistry, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Japan
(2)
Division of Cytogenetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Mishima, Japan
(3)
Proteomics Support Unit, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan
(4)
Division of Chromatin Regulation, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki, Japan
(5)
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
(6)
KNC Laboratories Co. Ltd., Kobe, Japan
(7)
Laboratory for Genome Regeneration, Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
(8)
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan

References

  1. Alper BJ, Lowe BR, Partridge JF. Centromeric heterochromatin assembly in fission yeast–balancing transcription, RNA interference and chromatin modification. Chromosome Res. 2012;20:521–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Holoch D, Moazed D. RNA-mediated epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:71–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Allshire RC, Ekwall K. Epigenetic regulation of chromatin states in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a018770.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Martienssen R, Moazed D. RNAi and heterochromatin assembly. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a019323.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Jia S, Noma K, Grewal SI. RNAi-independent heterochromatin nucleation by the stress-activated ATF/CREB family proteins. Science. 2004;304:1971–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kanoh J, Sadaie M, Urano T, Ishikawa F. Telomere binding protein Taz1 establishes Swi6 heterochromatin independently of RNAi at telomeres. Curr Biol. 2005;15:1808–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansen KR, Ibarra PT, Thon G. Evolutionary-conserved telomere-linked helicase genes of fission yeast are repressed by silencing factors, RNAi components and the telomere-binding protein Taz1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:78–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Volpe TA, Kidner C, Hall IM, Teng G, Grewal SI, Martienssen RA. Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science. 2002;297:1833–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kato H, Goto DB, Martienssen RA, Urano T, Furukawa K, Murakami Y. RNA polymerase II is required for RNAi-dependent heterochromatin assembly. Science. 2005;309:467–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kawakami K, Hayashi A, Nakayama J, Murakami Y. A novel RNAi protein, Dsh1, assembles RNAi machinery on chromatin to amplify heterochromatic siRNA. Genes Dev. 2012;26:1811–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Oya E, Kato H, Chikashige Y, Tsutsumi C, Hiraoka Y, Murakami Y. Mediator directs co-transcriptional heterochromatin assembly by RNA interference-dependent and -independent pathways. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003677.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Buker SM, Iida T, Buhler M, Villen J, Gygi SP, Nakayama J, Moazed D. Two different Argonaute complexes are required for siRNA generation and heterochromatin assembly in fission yeast. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007;14:200–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Verdel A, Jia S, Gerber S, Sugiyama T, Gygi S, Grewal SI, Moazed D. RNAi-mediated targeting of heterochromatin by the RITS complex. Science. 2004;303:672–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Ishida M, Shimojo H, Hayashi A, Kawaguchi R, Ohtani Y, Uegaki K, Nishimura Y, Nakayama J. Intrinsic nucleic acid-binding activity of Chp1 chromodomain is required for heterochromatic gene silencing. Mol Cell. 2012;47:228–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Petrie VJ, Wuitschick JD, Givens CD, Kosinski AM, Partridge JF. RNA interference (RNAi)-dependent and RNAi-independent association of the Chp1 chromodomain protein with distinct heterochromatic loci in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:2331–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Partridge JF, DeBeauchamp JL, Kosinski AM, Ulrich DL, Hadler MJ, Noffsinger VJ. Functional separation of the requirements for establishment and maintenance of centromeric heterochromatin. Mol Cell. 2007;26:593–602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sugiyama T, Cam H, Verdel A, Moazed D, Grewal SI. RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is an essential component of a self-enforcing loop coupling heterochromatin assembly to siRNA production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:152–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Motamedi MR, Verdel A, Colmenares SU, Gerber SA, Gygi SP, Moazed D. Two RNAi complexes, RITS and RDRC, physically interact and localize to noncoding centromeric RNAs. Cell. 2004;119:789–802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bayne EH, White SA, Kagansky A, Bijos DA, Sanchez-Pulido L, Hoe KL, Kim DU, Park HO, Ponting CP, Rappsilber J, Allshire RC. Stc1: a critical link between RNAi and chromatin modification required for heterochromatin integrity. Cell. 2010;140:666–77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakayama J, Rice JC, Strahl BD, Allis CD, Grewal SI. Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epigenetic control of heterochromatin assembly. Science. 2001;292:110–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kagansky A, Folco HD, Almeida R, Pidoux AL, Boukaba A, Simmer F, Urano T, Hamilton GL, Allshire RC. Synthetic heterochromatin bypasses RNAi and centromeric repeats to establish functional centromeres. Science. 2009;324:1716–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Iwasaki S, Kobayashi M, Yoda M, Sakaguchi Y, Katsuma S, Suzuki T, Tomari Y. Hsc70/Hsp90 chaperone machinery mediates ATP-dependent RISC loading of small RNA duplexes. Mol Cell. 2010;39:292–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Iki T, Yoshikawa M, Nishikiori M, Jaudal MC, Matsumoto-Yokoyama E, Mitsuhara I, Meshi T, Ishikawa M. In vitro assembly of plant RNA-induced silencing complexes facilitated by molecular chaperone HSP90. Mol Cell. 2010;39:282–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Miyoshi T, Takeuchi A, Siomi H, Siomi MC. A direct role for Hsp90 in pre-RISC formation in Drosophila. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:1024–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Xiol J, Cora E, Koglgruber R, Chuma S, Subramanian S, Hosokawa M, Reuter M, Yang Z, Berninger P, Palencia A, et al. A role for Fkbp6 and the chaperone machinery in piRNA amplification and transposon silencing. Mol Cell. 2012;47:970–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Izumi N, Kawaoka S, Yasuhara S, Suzuki Y, Sugano S, Katsuma S, Tomari Y. Hsp90 facilitates accurate loading of precursor piRNAs into PIWI proteins. RNA. 2013;19:896–901.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Pare JM, LaPointe P, Hobman TC. Hsp90 cochaperones p23 and FKBP4 physically interact with hAgo2 and activate RNA interference-mediated silencing in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:2303–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Martinez NJ, Chang HM, Borrajo Jde R, Gregory RI. The co-chaperones Fkbp4/5 control Argonaute2 expression and facilitate RISC assembly. RNA. 2013;19:1583–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Woehrer SL, Aronica L, Suhren JH, Busch CJ, Noto T, Mochizuki K. A Tetrahymena Hsp90 co-chaperone promotes siRNA loading by ATP-dependent and ATP-independent mechanisms. EMBO J. 2015;34:559–77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Iwasaki S, Sasaki HM, Sakaguchi Y, Suzuki T, Tadakuma H, Tomari Y. Defining fundamental steps in the assembly of the Drosophila RNAi enzyme complex. Nature. 2015;521:533–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Yoda M, Kawamata T, Paroo Z, Ye X, Iwasaki S, Liu Q, Tomari Y. ATP-dependent human RISC assembly pathways. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:17–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Verghese J, Abrams J, Wang Y, Morano KA. Biology of the heat shock response and protein chaperones: budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a model system. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76:115–58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Vjestica A, Zhang D, Liu J, Oliferenko S. Hsp70-Hsp40 chaperone complex functions in controlling polarized growth by repressing Hsf1-driven heat stress-associated transcription. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003886.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Cheetham ME, Caplan AJ. Structure, function and evolution of DnaJ: conservation and adaptation of chaperone function. Cell Stress Chaperones. 1998;3:28–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Wood V, Harris MA, McDowall MD, Rutherford K, Vaughan BW, Staines DM, Aslett M, Lock A, Bahler J, Kersey PJ, Oliver SG. PomBase: a comprehensive online resource for fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D695–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kato H, Okazaki K, Iida T, Nakayama J, Murakami Y, Urano T. Spt6 prevents transcription-coupled loss of posttranslationally modified histone H3. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2186.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Ekwall K, Olsson T, Turner BM, Cranston G, Allshire RC. Transient inhibition of histone deacetylation alters the structural and functional imprint at fission yeast centromeres. Cell. 1997;91:1021–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Panaretou B, Prodromou C, Roe SM, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. ATP binding and hydrolysis are essential to the function of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone in vivo. EMBO J. 1998;17:4829–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Mishra P, Flynn JM, Starr TN, Bolon DNA. Systematic mutant analyses elucidate general and client-specific aspects of Hsp90 function. Cell Rep. 2016;15:588–98.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Genevaux P, Schwager F, Georgopoulos C, Kelley WL. Scanning mutagenesis identifies amino acid residues essential for the in vivo activity of the Escherichia coli DnaJ (Hsp40) J-domain. Genetics. 2002;162:1045–53.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Qiu XB, Shao YM, Miao S, Wang L. The diversity of the DnaJ/Hsp40 family, the crucial partners for Hsp70 chaperones. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:2560–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sadaie M, Iida T, Urano T, Nakayama J. A chromodomain protein, Chp1, is required for the establishment of heterochromatin in fission yeast. EMBO J. 2004;23:3825–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Iida T, Iida N, Tsutsui Y, Yamao F, Kobayashi T. RNA interference regulates the cell cycle checkpoint through the RNA export factor, Ptr1, in fission yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;427:143–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Iida T, Kawaguchi R, Nakayama J. Conserved ribonuclease, Eri1, negatively regulates heterochromatin assembly in fission yeast. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1459–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Holoch D, Moazed D. Small-RNA loading licenses Argonaute for assembly into a transcriptional silencing complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22:328–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Ajit Tamadaddi C, Sahi C. J domain independent functions of J proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2016;21:563–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Craig EA, Marszalek J. How do J-proteins get Hsp70 to do so many different things? Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42:355–68.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Ekwall K, Cranston G, Allshire RC. Fission yeast mutants that alleviate transcriptional silencing in centromeric flanking repeats and disrupt chromosome segregation. Genetics. 1999;153:1153–69.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Tadeo X, Wang J, Kallgren SP, Liu J, Reddy BD, Qiao F, Jia S. Elimination of shelterin components bypasses RNAi for pericentric heterochromatin assembly. Genes Dev. 2013;27:2489–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Szankasi P, Heyer WD, Schuchert P, Kohli J. DNA sequence analysis of the ade6 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Wild-type and mutant alleles including the recombination host spot allele ade6-M26. J Mol Biol. 1988;204:917–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Bayne EH, Bijos DA, White SA, de Lima Alves F, Rappsilber J, Allshire RC. A systematic genetic screen identifies new factors influencing centromeric heterochromatin integrity in fission yeast. Genome Biol. 2014;15:481.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Tatsumi K, Sakashita G, Nariai Y, Okazaki K, Kato H, Obayashi E, Yoshida H, Sugiyama K, Park SY, Sekine J, Urano T. G196 epitope tag system: a novel monoclonal antibody, G196, recognizes the small, soluble peptide DLVPR with high affinity. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43480.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Reinhart BJ, Bartel DP. Small RNAs correspond to centromere heterochromatic repeats. Science. 1831;2002:297.Google Scholar
  54. Kiely CM, Marguerat S, Garcia JF, Madhani HD, Bahler J, Winston F. Spt6 is required for heterochromatic silencing in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31:4193–204.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. DeGennaro CM, Alver BH, Marguerat S, Stepanova E, Davis CP, Bahler J, Park PJ, Winston F. Spt6 regulates intragenic and antisense transcription, nucleosome positioning, and histone modifications genome-wide in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:4779–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Sadaie M, Shinmyozu K, Nakayama J. A conserved SET domain methyltransferase, Set11, modifies ribosomal protein Rpl12 in fission yeast. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:7185–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, Dufayard JF, Guindon S, Lefort V, Lescot M, et al. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W465–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J Mol Biol. 2000;300:1005–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement