- Oral presentation
- Open Access
ISWI and CHD chromatin remodelers bind to promoters but act in gene bodies
Epigenetics & Chromatinvolume 6, Article number: O29 (2013)
ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelers influence genetic processes by altering nucleosome occupancy, positioning, and composition. In vitro, yeast imitation switch (ISWI) and chromodomain helicase DNA-binding (CHD) remodelers bind ~30-85 bp of extranucleosomal DNA [1–3]. However, in vivo, ISWI and CHD remodelers act within gene bodies , which contain regularly spaced nucleosomes separated by less than 20 bp of linker DNA . How, then, do ISWI and CHD remodelers act within regions containing insufficient linker DNA for their association with chromatin?
To resolve this apparent paradox, we have mapped the genomic distributions of the yeast Isw1, Isw2, and Chd1 remodelers at base-pair resolution using immunoprecipitation of MNase-digested native chromatin and high-throughput sequencing (N-ChIP-seq).
We find that ISWI and CHD remodelers are most highly enriched at nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs), where they bind to regions of extended linker DNA adjacent to particular transcription factors. Surprisingly, remodeler-NDR association is independent of catalytic activity, suggesting that remodeler binding to NDRs is not catalytically relevant but instead poises remodelers for action within gene bodies. Remodeler occupancy is correlated with nucleosome turnover, suggesting that remodelers act within regions of transient nucleosome depletion following transcriptional elongation.
We suggest that transcription factors recruit ISWI and CHD remodelers to their binding sites within NDRs, where there is ample linker DNA to facilitate their association with chromatin. Transcriptional elongation then evicts or disrupts nucleosomes, creating regions of extended linker DNA within gene bodies. NDR-bound ISWI and CHD remodelers would thus be poised to follow in the wake of RNA polymerase II, efficiently repositioning nucleosomes within regions of extended linker DNA. This model reconciles the seemingly incompatible in vitro extranucleosomal DNA requirements of ISWI and CHD remodelers with the short linkers found in vivo.
Kagalwala MN, Glaus BJ, Dang W, Zofall M, Bartholomew B: Topography of the ISW2-nucleosome complex: insights into nucleosome spacing and chromatin remodeling. EMBO J. 2004, 23 (10): 2092-2104. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600220.
Gangaraju VK, Bartholomew B: Dependency of ISW1a Chromatin Remodeling on Extranucleosomal DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27 (8): 3217-3225. 10.1128/MCB.01731-06.
McKnight JN, Jenkins KR, Nodelman IM, Escobar T, Bowman GD: Extranucleosomal DNA Binding Directs Nucleosome Sliding by Chd1. Mol Cell Biol. 2011, 31 (23): 4746-4759. 10.1128/MCB.05735-11.
Gkikopoulos T, Schofield P, Singh V, Pinskaya M, Mellor J, Smolle M, Workman JL, Barton GJ, Owen-Hughes T: A Role for Snf2-Related Nucleosome-Spacing Enzymes in Genome-Wide Nucleosome Organization. Science. 2011, 333 (6050): 1758-1760. 10.1126/science.1206097.
Albert I, Mavrich TN, Tomsho LP, Qi J, Zanton SJ, Schuster SC, Pugh BF: Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomy cescerevisiae genome. Nature. 2007, 446 (7135): 572-576. 10.1038/nature05632.