Unusual DNA packaging characteristics in endoreduplicated Caenorhabditis elegans oocytes defined by in vivo accessibility to an endogenous nuclease activity
© Gu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 4 September 2013
Accepted: 17 September 2013
Published: 1 November 2013
Germ cells in animals are highly specialized to preserve the genome. A distinct set of chromatin structures must be properly established in germ cells to maintain cell fate and genome integrity. We describe DNA-surface interactions in activated Caenorhabditis elegans oocytes that are revealed through the activity of an endogenous nuclease ('endocleavage’).
Our analysis began with an unexpected observation that a majority (>50%) of DNA from ovulated but unfertilized C. elegans oocytes can be recovered in fragments of approximately 500 base pairs or shorter, cleaved at regular intervals (10 to 11 nt) along the DNA helix. In some areas of the genome, DNA cleavage patterns in these endoreduplicated oocytes appear consistent from cell-to-cell, indicating coherent rotational positioning of the DNA in chromatin. Particularly striking in this analysis are arrays of sensitive sites with a periodicity of approximately 10 bp that persist for several hundred base pairs of genomic DNA, longer than a single nucleosome core. Genomic regions with a strong bias toward a 10-nt periodic occurrence of A(n)/T(n) (so-called PATC regions) appear to exhibit a high degree of rotational constraint in endocleavage phasing, with a strong tendency for the periodic A(n)/T(n) sites to remain on the face of the helix protected from nuclease digestion.
The present analysis provides evidence for an unusual structure in C. elegans oocytes in which genomic DNA and associated protein structures are coherently linked.
Germ cells in animals are highly specialized to preserve the genome. A distinct set of chromatin structures must be properly established in germ cells to maintain cell fate and genome integrity [1, 2]. With the goal of understanding such structures in Caenorhabditis elegans, a number of groups have been applying combinations of genomics, biochemistry, and genetics (reviewed in ).
C. elegans oocytes arrest at the diakinesis stage of meiotic prophase I. Oocyte chromosomes at this stage are highly condensed, giving rise to the characteristic appearance of six discrete bivalents . Oocyte meiotic maturation, defined by the transition between diakinesis and metaphase of meiosis I, is triggered by a signal involving the major sperm protein (MSP) released from the sperm [4–6]. A mature oocyte signals the ovulation process by regulating the gonadal sheath cell contraction and inducing dilation of the hermaphrodite spermatheca , and then becomes fertilized as it passes through the spermatheca. In the absence of sperm (for example, in mutant C. elegans that are fully feminized), oocytes usually arrest at the diakinesis stage. However, in certain mutant strains that produce defective sperm, oocytes continuously mature and ovulate, endoreduplicating their DNA and resulting in a large number of unfertilized polyploid oocytes accumulating in the uterus. In this study, we use an endogenous nuclease activity present in these oocytes to identify an unusual chromatin structure.
Fragmented chromatin in activated fer-1(b232) C. elegans oocytes
DNA fragmentation as a general property of activated C. elegans oocytes
To determine the generality of the observed fragmentation, we obtained unfertilized oocyte DNA from a variety of sources and by a variety of protocols. In particular, we wished to determine whether the observed approximately 10-nt ladder was dependent on either the specific genetic background of the original fer-1(b232) strain or the oocyte isolation procedure used. An approximately 10-nt ladder pattern similar to that observed from purified fer-1(b232) was observed for DNA extracted from whole animals from a different fer-1 mutant stock (fer-1(hc13)) raised at the restrictive temperature of 25°C (Figure 2). This isolation used flash frozen animals extracted directly for DNA (without an oocyte preparation step), indicating that DNA cleavage is not due to the oocyte preparation procedure. Two other sperm-defective mutants, spe-9(hc52) [11, 12] (required for sperm-oocyte interaction) and spe-26(hc138)  (required for spermatid formation) were tested and showed the same approximately 10-nt ladder pattern as fer-1 mutant oocytes (Figure 2). These results are consistent with endogenous DNase activity and consequent DNA cleavage in an approximately 10-nt ladder pattern as a general property of activated C. elegans oocytes.
A role for the type II DNase NUC-1 in activated oocyte endocleavage, independent of the apoptosis machinery
Chromosome fragmentation is a hallmark of apoptotic cells in mammals, as well as in lower metazoans (reviewed in ). Aruscavage and colleagues had showed that the endogenous cleavage activity observed in C. elegans embryos depends on programmed cell death machinery (the caspase-homolog CED-3) and an associated type-II DNase NUC-1 [10, 15–17].
To investigate whether the canonical programmed cell death pathway and/or NUC-1 are required for the endo-cleavage activity in activated oocytes, we constructed double mutants fer-1(hc13);ced-3(n717) and fer-1(hc13);nuc-1(e1392), growing each at the restrictive temperature (25°C) to allow oocyte accumulation. DNA from fer-1(hc13);ced-3(n717) double mutant animals yields an approximately 10-base periodic ladder similar to that observed in apoptosis-competent fer- and spe-strains, indicating that CED-3 activity (and thus the canonical cell death pathway) is not required for the observed oocyte endocleavage. In contrast, the fer-1(hc13);nuc-1(e1392) double mutant fails to yield an evident 10-nt ladder pattern (Figure 2). These results implicate NUC-1, induced by a CED-3-independent mechanism, in the observed activated oocyte endocleavage.
Construction of DNA libraries from endocleavage products
To understand the relation between fragmentation activities and the arrangement of DNA packaged in oocyte chromatin, we set out to characterize the precise sites of DNA cleavage. Fragmented fer-1(b232) oocyte DNA from different size ranges (20 to 80, 40 to 130, 80 to 230, and 130 to 430 bp) was isolated by using an agarose gel. The majority of these DNA fragments were double-stranded with a 2 to 3 nt overhang at the 3′ ends (see later section and Methods). Size-selected DNA fragments were treated with T4 DNA polymerase to produce blunt ends, followed by linker ligation. The resulting libraries were analyzed by paired-end sequencing (Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing system), allowing both ends to be mapped. With the criterion that paired reads match perfectly to a unique position of the reference genome, approximately 6.1, 8.0, 15.6, and 15.5 million alignments were obtained by this process for the 20 to 80, 40 to 130, 80 to 230, and 130 to 430 nt size ranges, respectively. We also performed single-end Illumina sequencing for endocleaved oocyte DNA in the 40 to 90, 90 to 140, and 140 to 240 nt size ranges.
The size of captured DNA fragments can be assessed by the distance between paired reads. The distributions of the distances between paired reads show approximately a 10-bp periodicity (Additional file 1: Figure S2), consistent with the DNA electrophoresis profile on the denaturing PAGE (Figure 1b). The peak sizes determined from sequencing are approximately 2 to 3 nt shorter than the sizes determined from a denaturing gel (Additional file 1: Figure S2 and Figure 1b), a difference that can be explained by a 2 to 3 nt single stranded overhang at the 3′ end on each strand (See Methods section and Additional file 1: Figure S3). The 130 to 430 nt size range DNA had a more continuous distribution, with maximal frequency at 145 nt. We note, however, that an approximately 10-bp periodic component remains in the 130 to 430 nt size range (for example, peaks at 178, 189, 199 nt) [Additional file 1: Figure S2].
Activated oocyte DNA is constrained in its rotational positioning at the genomic level
The detailed structure of chromatin in a region can determine which face of the DNA double helix is protected by an underlying surface (for example, core histone octamer) and which face is accessible. At any given locus in the genome, the accessible face can be random among individual cells (that is, variable rotational positioning) or, in the other extreme, a particular face can be consistently accessible in all cells (that is, exhibiting a constrained rotational positioning). The 10-nt ladder appearance of the fragmented DNA in activated fer-1(b232) oocytes indicates that the endogenous DNA cleavage events tend to occur periodically for every helical turn in the DNA double helix.
The auto-correlation analysis for activated oocyte DNA fragments reveals a prominent approximately 10-nt periodic signal for the coincidence numbers (for example, peaks at 10, 21, 31, 41, 51, 62, 72, and 82 nt, etcetera) (Figure 3b), indicating that the cleavage sites in the activated oocyte chromatin have a strong tendency for consistent placement on an 'accessible’ face of the DNA double helix in different cells. This type of result suggests an underlying surface that may locally protect one face of the DNA from digestion while leaving the other face open to the enzyme. A previous whole-genome analysis of DNase I-generated chromatin fragments using human cells revealed a similar 10-nt periodic signal for DNase I-sensitive sites; however the observed phasing character was restricted to a distance that would be contained in a single mononucleosome . In contrast, the 10-nt periodic signal observed in the C. elegans oocyte endo-cleaved chromatin fragments is maintained in aggregate over a distance ranging up to 500 bases and above, indicated by the 10-nt periodicity in this region of the autocorrelation plot (Figure 3b). By this analysis, 34% of the autocorrelation signal with a 100-nt window derives from sites with constrained rotational positioning (8.9 for 101 to 200 nt, 2.8% for 201 to 301 nt, 1.1% for 301 to 400 nt, and 0.64% for 401 to 500 nt). Fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis of this signal indicated that the periodicity of the coincidence frequency is 10.1 nt (Figure 3c). However, we note that the Fourier analysis may represent a situation that in reality is considerably more complex than can be modeled with a single peak - indeed DNA in different physical and biological configurations is known to have helical periodicity ranging between 10 and 11 (for example,) with the underlying physical situation expected to vary both between cell types and (as a consequence of DNA sequence, base composition, or underlying physical structure) between regions in the genome. Numerous large-scale chromatin structures have been proposed in diverse systems, each with different detailed consequences in terms of the balance of helical periodicity across any localized region [23–25]. Experimental analysis of accessibility [26, 27], likewise supports a somewhat variable periodicity within the nucleosomal repeat that varies somewhat for different sub-nucleosomal regions (in particular around the dyad).
To obtain an indication of the extent of periodic structure underlying the DNA as a function of position in the genome, we performed the autocorrelation analysis separately for endo-cleavage ends that occur in each of six chromosomes. All chromosomes exhibit similar degrees of rotational positioning in this analysis [Additional file 1: Figure S4]. We also performed the autocorrelation analysis separately for endo-cleavage ends that occur within introns or exons. Both exonic and intronic ends exhibit similar high degrees of rotational positioning [Additional file 1: Figure S4]. These observations implicate an underlying periodic structure as a consistent and extensive feature of activated oocyte chromatin.
When the auto-correlation analysis was performed for the MNase-generated DNA fragments from the longer fer-1(b232) oocyte chromatin, the coincidence numbers oscillate with additional periodicity that corresponds to an approximately 178-nt nucleosome-like repeat length (that is, nucleosome core DNA + spacer) (Figure 3d and 3e), consistent with at least a fraction of DNA in the oocyte preparations being packaged in regularly spaced, positionally constrained nucleosomes. The prominent approximately 10-nt phasing signal observed for the endocleaved oocyte DNA fragments is absent in the MNase-generated nucleosome core DNA fragments.
When the auto-correlation analysis was performed for the endo-cleavage DNA fragments from wild type embryos, the degree of non-random rotational positioning is approximately 5-fold lower than that observed for fer-1(b232) oocyte endo-cleaved DNA fragments in the size range of 1 to 100 nt (and approximately 7-fold in the size range of 101 to 200 nt) (Figure 3c); the stronger amplitude and persistence of autocorrelation deriving from fer-1(b232) oocytes argues for differentiating features of oocyte chromatin that produce greater long-range periodicity and greater cell-to-cell rotational consistency than was observed in the somatic embryo tissue.
In summary, the prominent approximately 10-nt periodic signals in the oocyte auto-correlation analyses indicate that a particular face of the activated oocyte DNA in a large fraction of the genome is preferentially cleaved by the endogenous DNase activity. For this portion of the genome, we can infer that the activated oocyte DNA has been operationally constrained in its rotational positioning relative to an underlying protective surface.
Packaging of activated oocyte DNA at the 5′ ends of H3K4me3-anchored genes exhibits unusual phasing characteristics
Genome-wide nucleosome mapping studies from a number of model organisms have shown nucleosome positioning that appears to be variable for a substantial fraction of the genome [18, 28]. A small fraction of nucleosomes, on the other hand, are constrained to occupy specific positions. These so called positioned nucleosomes are often found near transcription start sites of active genes [20, 29–32]. The first nucleosome downstream of the transcription start site (conventionally referred to as the plus-one nucleosome) often exhibits the highest degree of positional constraint. In addition, the plus-one nucleosome tends to include a distinct set of histone variants (for example, H3.3)  and post-translationally modified histones (for example, H3K4me2/3) .
The ends of the activated oocyte DNA fragments tend to be within regions that are packaged into nucleosome cores in mixed-tissue preparations. For example, at the plus-one nucleosome position (marked by peak frequencies of MNase-generated nucleosome core DNA ends at -73 and 73 nt for the sense- and anti-sense-strand tags, respectively, Figure 4), the sense-strand tags of the activated oocyte DNA of 40 to 90 nt size range have the highest frequencies in the first half (highest frequencies occur at positions -39 and -29 nt). The profile of anti-sense-strand tags is a near mirror image of the sense-strand tags with the reference to the dyad position of the plus one nucleosome.
The plus-one nucleosome in activated oocytes exhibits the highest degree of constraint on the apparent rotational positioning, indicated by the most dramatic approximately 10-nt periodic oscillation of the activated oocyte DNA ends at this region. DNA in what would be the plus-two nucleosome has a strong tendency to be constrained in the same rotational positioning as the plus-one nucleosome. Remarkably, the approximately 10-nt phasing character is maintained through the dyad positions of these two nucleosome positions and even the linker region. The constrained rotational positioning shared by plus-one and plus-two nucleosome regions diminishes outside of these nucleosome regions (compared to the plus-two nucleosome, the minus-one nucleosome shows a weaker but still significant tendency to be constrained in the same rotational positioning as the plus-one nucleosome). We note the possibility that the underlying structure in these regions may be non-nucleosomal in some or all oocytes (or may be a very unusual nucleosome-like structure): whether the surface of interaction being revealed by these cleavages is indeed a pair of nucleosomes remains to be determined.
Periodic A(n)/T(n) clusters (PATCs) characteristic of germline-expression in C. elegans are positioned on the inaccessible surface of activated oocyte DNA
DNA with short A(n)/T(n) sequences that are distributed along one face of the DNA double helix exhibits unusual curvature and a tendency for the A(n)/T(n) sequence to face inward towards the nucleosome, at least in vitro[36–40]. A significant fraction of the C. elegans genome has a strong approximately 10-nt periodic A(n)/T(n) signal [41–43], with high PATC frequency associated with oocyte-expressed genes . Although this DNA can exhibit DNA bending in vitro (and can be packaged into nucleosomes [18, 20, 28]) the structural consequences of this sequence characteristic for the organization of chromatin are presently unknown.
Discussions and conclusions
The patterns of DNA fragmentation in activated C. elegans oocytes provide evidence for a large-scale chromatin organization in which long segments of DNA (>500 bp) are consistently organized on a surface that constrains accessibility of one helical face. That these organized segments are larger than individual nucleosomes argues either (i) for a stereotyped multi-nucleosome structure that might allow an uninterrupted approximately 10-bp periodicity, (ii) for a larger 'mega’ nucleosome-like structure that might accommodate several hundred base pairs of DNA, or (iii) for a large non-nucleosomal surface that might organize DNA. We consider each of the three models to be potentially valid hypotheses for further study.
A number of previous structural discussions (see for example, [24, 45, 46] for relevant discussion) have dealt with questions related to the potential persistence of an approximately 10-bp periodicity in sequence accessibility over multiple adjacent conventional nucleosomes. While nucleosomes separated by a variable spacer length would be expected to lose helically periodic accessibility at separations significantly beyond a single unit nucleosome length, certain fixed or constrained linker lengths would allow retention of a periodic pattern. Such arrangements might have the effect (with potential advantage to the organism) of allowing a single underlying periodicity in some regions of the genome to constrain incremental sliding of nucleosomes in response to lateral forces, while potentially increasing nucleosome dissociation in response to such forces.
While conventional single-octamer nucleosome-based structures are certainly prevalent in virtually every system analyzed, there have been additional observations (see  for review) suggesting flexibility in the underlying structure that might be expected under specific constraints to also allow larger histone-based complexes ('Mega-nucleosomes’?) as scaffolds for larger segments of DNA. While certainly requiring confirmation and further analysis, such larger structures are consistent with early studies on at least one system with actively replicating DNA .
Beyond the category of nucleosome-like protein: DNA structures, additional non-nucleosomal surfaces within the nucleus (and the semi-consistent association of these surfaces with the DNA) could account for a periodicity as we have observed; candidate surfaces might include nuclear lamina and envelope structures, meiotic condensation cores, and (potentially) yet-to-be-discovered protein-DNA interfaces.
Whatever their structural basis, the biochemical patterns revealed by our analysis match features associated with promoter organization and periodic nucleotide sequence composition in germline-expressed C. elegans genes, suggesting (despite the endoreduplicated character of oocytes isolated in bulk from C. elegans) that the chromosome organization described here would have been present and functionally relevant on a sufficient evolutionary timescale to influence the underlying sequence, either through selection at the organismal level or through mutational biases introduced by the anisotropic activity.
C. elegans oocytes were purified from the fer-1(b232) mutant worms grown at the restrictive temperature of 25-26°C as described . Oocytes were flash frozen upon harvest. Frozen oocytes were ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen. For direct lysis (that is, no micrococcal nuclease treatment), DNA was isolated by incubating the worm sample with 400 μl lysis buffer (100 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 1% SDS, 50 mM EDTA, 0.2 mg/ml protease K) at 65°C for 1 hour, followed by extraction with an equal volume of phenol/chloroform (1:1), extraction with an equal volume of chloroform, and by precipitation with ethanol (1 ml). Approximately 5 to 20 μg of DNA was obtained from this procedure. In cases where micrococcal nuclease (MNase) treatment was applied, liquid-nitrogen-ground oocytes (or similar samples from other stages) were directly resuspended in buffer A (15 mM Hepes-Na, pH 7.5, 60 mM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, 0.15 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 0.15 mM spermine, 0.15 mM spermidine, 0.34 M sucrose) containing 0.5 mM PMSF, 1/100 dilution of HALT protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific), 1 mM DTT, and 2 mM CaCl2. For micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion, 0.1 ml oocyte crude lysate was first pre-warmed to 37°C for one minute, then treated with 0.002, 0.02, or 0.1 U/l MNase (Roche). The reaction mix was incubated at 37°C for two minutes and digestion was then stopped by adding EGTA to a final concentration of 20 mM. DNA was isolated by incubating the worm sample with 400 μl lysis buffer (100 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 1% SDS, 50 mM EDTA, 0.2 mg/ml protease K) at 65°C for 1 hour, followed by organic extraction and DNA precipitation as above.
DNA library preparation
DNA was treated with 0.5 U/μl T4 polynucleotide kinase (NEB) in 1x T4 DNA ligase buffer (NEB, containing 1 mM ATP) at 37°C for 1 hour to phosphorylate 5′ ends and dephosphorylate 3′ ends. Ends were then blunted in a reaction containing 0.75 U/μl of T4 DNA polymerase (NEB), dNTP (100 μM each, Roche), and 1x NEB buffer 1 at 12°C for 15 min. DNA was then ligated to previously annealed DNA oligonucleotides AF-SG-133 (5′ Pi-AGATCGGAAGAGCTCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG-OH 3′) and AF-SG-134 (5′ OH-CCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT-OH 3′) (NEB Quick Ligation Kit). DNA captured by linker oligonucleotides was resolved using 6% polyacrylamide (acrylamide:bis-acrylamide = 19:1) gels containing 8 M urea, followed by PCR amplification with primers AF-SG-135 (5′ OH-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT-OH 3′) and AF-SG-137 (5′ OH-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGCT-OH 3′). We carefully selected cycle numbers for which product levels have not saturated (that is, product levels were still able to increase substantially with additional cycles); this protocol ensures that the majority of amplified segments are still annealed to a true complement, avoiding reannealing distortion in the resulting sequence libraries . After separating PCR products on 2% agarose gels, DNA bands of the expected size were extracted (Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit (Invitrogen); omitting the 50°C heating step), followed by massively parallel DNA sequencing using Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing system.
All sequencing data used in this study have been deposited in GEO ( GSE46499).
Characterization of the ends of fragmented DNA from activated oocytes
We radioactively labeled 5′-ends of fer-1(b232) oocyte DNA by using T4 polynucleotide kinase and ATP gamma  P, followed by treatment with T4 DNA polymerase and dNTPs to produce blunt ends. End-labeling and T4 DNA polymerase reactions were performed when DNA was double-stranded. T4 DNA polymerase converts 5′ or 3′ single-stranded overhangs to blunt ends by either DNA polymerase or 3′-5′ exonuclease activity, respectively. When the T4 DNA polymerase-treated oocyte DNA was resolved on a denaturing PAGE, we observed that the sizes of oocyte DNA fragments consistently decreased by 2 to 3 nt when compared with the untreated sample [Additional file 1: Figure S3], indicating a 2 to 3-nt single-stranded overhang in the 3′ ends of oocyte DNA fragments (that is, two nearby cleavage events on the opposite strands are staggered by 2 to 3 nt).
SAGE data were obtained from the Genome BC C. elegans Gene Expression Consortium http://elegans.bcgsc.bc.ca/.
periodic A(n)/T(n) clusters
serial analysis of gene expression.
We thank Ziming Weng, Phil Lacroute, Arend Sidow, Tim Schedl, Huibin Zhang, Jason Merker, Diane Wu, Karen Artiles, Lia Gracey Maniar, Ayelet Lamm, Cecilia Mello, Michael Stadler, Rosa Alcazar, Jay Maniar, Idan Gabdank, and Julie Ni for help, suggestions and support. This work was funded by National Institutes of Health (grant R01-GM37706 to A. Fire) and by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to J. D. McGhee.
- Schaner CE, Kelly WG: Germline chromatin. WormBook. 2006, 1-14.Google Scholar
- Strome S: Specification of the germ line. WormBook. 2005, 1-10.Google Scholar
- Hirsh D, Oppenheim D, Klass M: Development of the reproductive system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1976, 49: 200-219. 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90267-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenstein D: Control of oocyte meiotic maturation and fertilization. WormBook. 2005, 1-12.Google Scholar
- McCarter J, Bartlett B, Dang T, Schedl T: On the control of oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1999, 205: 111-128. 10.1006/dbio.1998.9109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller MA, Nguyen VQ, Lee MH, Kosinski M, Schedl T, Caprioli RM, Greenstein D: A sperm cytoskeletal protein that signals oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation. Science. 2001, 291: 2144-2147. 10.1126/science.1057586.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stroeher VL, Kennedy BP, Millen KJ, Schroeder DF, Hawkins MG, Goszczynski B, McGhee JD: DNA-protein interactions in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo: oocyte and embryonic factors that bind to the promoter of the gut-specific ges-1 gene. Dev Biol. 1994, 163: 367-380. 10.1006/dbio.1994.1155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McKay SJ, Johnsen R, Khattra J, Asano J, Baillie DL, Chan S, Dube N, Fang L, Goszczynski B, Ha E, Halfnight E, Hollebakken R, Huang P, Hung K, Jensen V, Jones SJ, Kai H, Li D, Mah A, Marra M, McGhee J, Newbury R, Pouzyrev A, Riddle DL, Sonnhammer E, Tian H, Tu D, Tyson JR, Vatcher G, Warner A: Gene expression profiling of cells, tissues, and developmental stages of the nematode C. elegans. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2003, 68: 159-169. 10.1101/sqb.2003.68.159.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chik JK, Schriemer DC, Childs SJ, McGhee JD: Proteome of the Caenorhabditis elegans oocyte. J Proteome Res. 2011, 10: 2300-2305. 10.1021/pr101124f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aruscavage PJ, Hellwig S, Bass BL: Small DNA pieces in C. elegans are intermediates of DNA fragmentation during apoptosis. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e11217-10.1371/journal.pone.0011217.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- L’Hernault SW, Shakes DC, Ward S: Developmental genetics of chromosome I spermatogenesis-defective mutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1988, 120: 435-452.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singson A, Mercer KB, L’Hernault SW: The C. elegans spe-9 gene encodes a sperm transmembrane protein that contains EGF-like repeats and is required for fertilization. Cell. 1998, 93: 71-79. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81147-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varkey JP, Muhlrad PJ, Minniti AN, Do B, Ward S: The Caenorhabditis elegans spe-26 gene is necessary to form spermatids and encodes a protein similar to the actin-associated proteins kelch and scruin. Genes Dev. 1995, 9: 1074-1086. 10.1101/gad.9.9.1074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samejima K, Earnshaw WC: Trashing the genome: the role of nucleases during apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 6: 677-688. 10.1038/nrm1715.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu YC, Stanfield GM, Horvitz HR: NUC-1, a caenorhabditis elegans DNase II homolog, functions in an intermediate step of DNA degradation during apoptosis. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 536-548.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellis HM, Horvitz HR: Genetic control of programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans. Cell. 1986, 44: 817-829. 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90004-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lettre G, Hengartner MO: Developmental apoptosis in C. elegans: a complex CEDnario. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 7: 97-108. 10.1038/nrm1836.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valouev A, Ichikawa J, Tonthat T, Stuart J, Ranade S, Peckham H, Zeng K, Malek JA, Costa G, McKernan K, Sidow A, Fire A, Johnson SM: A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 1051-1063. 10.1101/gr.076463.108.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valouev A, Johnson SM, Boyd SD, Smith CL, Fire AZ, Sidow A: Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature. 2011, 474: 516-520. 10.1038/nature10002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gu SG, Fire A: Partitioning the C. elegans genome by nucleosome modification, occupancy, and positioning. Chromosoma. 2010, 119: 73-87. 10.1007/s00412-009-0235-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyle AP, Davis S, Shulha HP, Meltzer P, Margulies EH, Weng Z, Furey TS, Crawford GE: High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell. 2008, 132: 311-322. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.014.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang JC: Helical repeat of DNA in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979, 76: 200-203. 10.1073/pnas.76.1.200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andrews AJ, Luger K: Nucleosome structure(s) and stability: variations on a theme. Annu Rev Biophys. 2011, 40: 99-117. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bian Q, Belmont AS: Revisiting higher-order and large-scale chromatin organization. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012, 24: 359-366. 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.03.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woodcock CL, Ghosh RP: Chromatin higher-order structure and dynamics. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010, 2: a000596-10.1101/cshperspect.a000596.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Syed SH, Goutte-Gattat D, Becker N, Meyer S, Shukla MS, Hayes JJ, Everaers R, Angelov D, Bednar J, Dimitrov S: Single-base resolution mapping of H1-nucleosome interactions and 3D organization of the nucleosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 9620-9625. 10.1073/pnas.1000309107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bishop EP, Rohs R, Parker SC, West SM, Liu P, Mann RS, Honig B, Tullius TD: A map of minor groove shape and electrostatic potential from hydroxyl radical cleavage patterns of DNA. ACS Chem Biol. 2011, 6: 1314-1320. 10.1021/cb200155t.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson SM, Tan FJ, McCullough HL, Riordan DP, Fire AZ: Flexibility and constraint in the nucleosome core landscape of Caenorhabditis elegans chromatin. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 1505-1516. 10.1101/gr.5560806.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yuan GC, Liu YJ, Dion MF, Slack MD, Wu LF, Altschuler SJ, Rando OJ: Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science. 2005, 309: 626-630. 10.1126/science.1112178.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Segal E, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Chen L, Thastrom A, Field Y, Moore IK, Wang JP, Widom J: A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature. 2006, 442: 772-778. 10.1038/nature04979.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mavrich TN, Jiang C, Ioshikhes IP, Li X, Venters BJ, Zanton SJ, Tomsho LP, Qi J, Glaser RL, Schuster SC, Gilmour DS, Albert I, Pugh BF: Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome. Nature. 2008, 453: 358-362. 10.1038/nature06929.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schones DE, Cui K, Cuddapah S, Roh TY, Barski A, Wang Z, Wei G, Zhao K: Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell. 2008, 132: 887-898. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elsaesser SJ, Goldberg AD, Allis CD: New functions for an old variant: no substitute for histone H3.3. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010, 20: 110-117. 10.1016/j.gde.2010.01.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santos-Rosa H, Schneider R, Bannister AJ, Sherriff J, Bernstein BE, Emre NC, Schreiber SL, Mellor J, Kouzarides T: Active genes are tri-methylated at K4 of histone H3. Nature. 2002, 419: 407-411. 10.1038/nature01080.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGhee JD, Fukushige T, Krause MW, Minnema SE, Goszczynski B, Gaudet J, Kohara Y, Bossinger O, Zhao Y, Khattra J, Hirst M, Jones SJ, Marra MA, Ruzanov P, Warner A, Zapf R, Moerman DG, Kalb JM: ELT-2 is the predominant transcription factor controlling differentiation and function of the C. elegans intestine, from embryo to adult. Dev Biol. 2009, 327: 551-565. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.11.034.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodsell DS, Dickerson RE: Bending and curvature calculations in B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 5497-5503. 10.1093/nar/22.24.5497.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koo HS, Wu HM, Crothers DM: DNA bending at adenine thymine tracts. Nature. 1986, 320: 501-506. 10.1038/320501a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nelson HC, Finch JT, Luisi BF, Klug A: The structure of an oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tract and its biological implications. Nature. 1987, 330: 221-226. 10.1038/330221a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ulanovsky LE, Trifonov EN: Estimation of wedge components in curved DNA. Nature. 1987, 326: 720-722. 10.1038/326720a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Satchwell SC, Drew HR, Travers AA: Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J Mol Biol. 1986, 191: 659-675. 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90452-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fire A, Alcazar R, Tan F: Unusual DNA structures associated with germline genetic activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2006, 173: 1259-1273. 10.1534/genetics.106.057364.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- VanWye JD, Bronson EC, Anderson JN: Species-specific patterns of DNA bending and sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19: 5253-5261. 10.1093/nar/19.19.5253.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Widom J: Short-range order in two eukaryotic genomes: relation to chromosome structure. J Mol Biol. 1996, 259: 579-588. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moreno-Herrero F, Seidel R, Johnson SM, Fire A, Dekker NH: Structural analysis of hyperperiodic DNA from Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: 3057-3066. 10.1093/nar/gkl397.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karpov VL, Bavykin SG, Preobrazhenskaya OV, Belyavsky AV, Mirzabekov AD: Alignment of nucleosomes along DNA and organization of spacer DNA in Drosophila chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982, 10: 4321-4337. 10.1093/nar/10.14.4321.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Widom J: A relationship between the helical twist of DNA and the ordered positioning of nucleosomes in all eukaryotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89: 1095-1099. 10.1073/pnas.89.3.1095.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levy A, Jakob KM: Nascent DNA in nucleosome like structures from chromatin. Cell. 1978, 14: 259-267. 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90112-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parameswaran P, Jalili R, Tao L, Shokralla S, Gharizadeh B, Ronaghi M, Fire AZ: A pyrosequencing-tailored nucleotide barcode design unveils opportunities for large-scale sample multiplexing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: e130-10.1093/nar/gkm760.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.